Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik

A Quarterly of Language, Literature and Culture

[Journal of English and American Studies]

Ed. by Butter, Michael / Eckstein, Lars / Frenk, Joachim / Georgi-Findlay, Brigitte / Herbst, Thomas / Korte, Barbara / Leypoldt, Günter / Reinfandt, Christoph / Stefanowitsch, Anatol

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2017: 0.07

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.123
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.323

Online
ISSN
2196-4726
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 66, Issue 3

Issues

Creativity and Construction Grammar: Cognitive and Psychological Issues

Thomas Hoffmann
  • Corresponding author
  • Katholische Universität Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Chair of English Language and Linguistics, Universitätsallee 1, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2018-09-04 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2018-0024

Abstract

Creativity is an important evolutionary adaptation that allows humans to think original thoughts, to find solutions to problems that have never been encountered before and, potentially, to fundamentally change the way we live. In this special issue, we explore the cognitive and psychological factors that influence the verbal creativity of speakers.

Works Cited

  • Auer, Peter and Stefan Pfänder (2011). “Constructions: Emergent or Emerging.” Peter Auer and Stefan Pfänder, eds. Constructions: Emerging and Emergent. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 1–21.Google Scholar

  • Barber, Charles (1997). Early Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

  • Barðdal, Jóhanna (2008). Productivity: Evidence from Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Bencini, Giulia M.L. (2013). “Psycholinguistics.” Thomas Hoffmann and Graeme Trousdale, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 379–396.Google Scholar

  • Bergs, Alexander (2018). “Learn the Rules like a Pro, so you can Break them like an Artist (Picasso). Linguistic Aberrancy from a Constructional Perspective.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66.3, 277–293.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bergs, Alexander and Peter Schneck (2013). “Kognitive Poetik.” Achim Stephan and Sven Walter, eds. Handbuch Kommunikationswissenschaft. Stuttgart: Metzler, 518–522.Google Scholar

  • Boas, Hans C. (2013). “Cognitive Construction Grammar.” Thomas Hoffmann and Graeme Trousdale, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 233–252.Google Scholar

  • Brandt, Per Aage and Jakob Simonsen (2007). “Editorial Preface.” Cognitive Semiotics 1, 5–6.Google Scholar

  • Bybee, Joan (2006). “From Usage to Grammar: The Mind’s Response to Repetition.” Language 82.4, 711–733.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bybee, Joan (2010). Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bybee, Joan (2013). “Usage-Based Theory and Exemplar Representations of Constructions.” Thomas Hoffmann and Graeme Trousdale, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 49–69.Google Scholar

  • Chomsky, Noam (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague/Paris: Mouton. Janua Linguarum/Series Minor 4.Google Scholar

  • Chomsky, Noam (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Chomsky, Noam (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Chomsky, Noam (2000). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Croft, William (2001). Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Croft, William (2012). Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Croft, William and D. Alan Cruse (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics.Google Scholar

  • Culicover, Peter W. and Ray Jackendoff (1999). “The View from the Periphery: The English Comparative Correlative.” Linguistic Inquiry 30.4, 543–571.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dąbrowska, Ewa (2012). “Different Speakers, Different Grammars.” Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 2.3, 219–253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • de Smet, Hendrick (2018). “Unwitting Inventors: English Speakers use -ly-Adverbs More Creatively when Primed.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66.3, 329–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Diessel, Holger (2013). “Construction Grammar and First Language Acquisition.” Thomas Hoffmann and Graeme Trousdale, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 347–378.Google Scholar

  • Ellis, Nick C. (2013). “Construction Grammar and Second Language Acquisition.” Thomas Hoffmann and Graeme Trousdale, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 365–378.Google Scholar

  • Fauconnier, Gilles and Mark Turner (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

  • Fillmore, Charles J. (1988). “The Mechanisms of ‘Construction Grammar’.” Berkeley Linguistic Society 14, 35–55.Google Scholar

  • Franck, Dorothea (1985). “Sentences in Conversational Turns: A Case of Syntactic ‘Double Bind’.” Marcelo Dascal, ed. Dialogue: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 233–245.Google Scholar

  • Goldberg, Adele E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Goldberg, Adele E. (2003). “Constructions: A New Theoretical Approach to Language.” TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 7.5, 219–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goldberg, Adele E. (2006). Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hennessey, Beth A. and Teresa M. Amabile (2010). “Creativity.” Annual Review of Psychology 61, 569–598.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Herbst, Thomas (2018). “Collo-Creativity and Blending: Recognizing Creativity Requires Lexical Storage in Constructional Slots.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66.3, 309–328.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hockett, Charles F. (1960). “The Origin of Speech.” Scientific American 203.3, 88–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hoffmann, Thomas (2014). “The Cognitive Evolution of Englishes: The Role of Constructions in the Dynamic Model.” Sarah Buschfeld, Thomas Hoffmann, Magnus Huber, and Alexander Kautzsch, eds. The Evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and Beyond. Amsterdam, PA: John Benjamins, 160–180.Google Scholar

  • Hoffmann, Thomas (2017a). “From Constructions to Construction Grammars.” Barbara Dancygier, ed. The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 284–309.Google Scholar

  • Hoffmann, Thomas (2017b). “Construction Grammars.” Barbara Dancygier, ed. The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 310–329.Google Scholar

  • Hoffmann, Thomas (2017c). “Multimodal Constructs – Multimodal Constructions? The Role of Constructions in the Working Memory.” Linguistics Vanguard 3.1.Google Scholar

  • Hoffmann, Thomas and Graeme Trousdale, eds. (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hopper, Paul (2011). “Emergent Grammar and Temporality in Interactional Linguistics.” Peter Auer and Stefan Pfänder, eds. Constructions: Emerging and Emergent. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 22–44.Google Scholar

  • Imo, Wolfgang (2015). “Interactional Construction Grammar.” Linguistics Vanguard 1.1, 69–77.Google Scholar

  • Jackendoff, Ray S. (2002). Foundations of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Johnson, Matt A. and Adele E. Goldberg (2013). “Evidence for Automatic Accessing of Constructional Meaning: Jabberwocky Sentences Prime Associated Verbs.” Language and Cognitive Processes 28.10, 1439–1452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jurafsky, Daniel (1992). “An On-line Computational Model of Human Sentence Interpretation.” American Association for Artificial Intelligence, eds. Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-92). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 302–308.Google Scholar

  • Kandler, Christian, Rainer Riemann, Alois Angleitner, Frank M. Spinath, Peter Borkenau, and Lars Penke (2016). “The Nature of Creativity: The Roles of Genetic Factors, Personality Traits, Cognitive Abilities, and Environmental Sources.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 111, 230–249.Google Scholar

  • Kaufman, James C. (2016). Creativity 101. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, George (1987). Woman, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Langacker, Ronald W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Leech, Geoffrey N. (1969). A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Müller, Stefan (2016). Grammatical Theory: From Transformational Grammar to Constraint-based Approaches. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar

  • Pulvermüller, Friedemann, Bert Cappelle, and Yury Shtyrov (2013). “Brain Basis of Meaning, Words, Constructions, and Grammar.” Thomas Hoffmann and Graeme Trousdale, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 397–416.Google Scholar

  • Rhodes, James Melvin (1962). “An Analysis of Creativity.” Phi Delta Kappan 42, 305–311.Google Scholar

  • Sampson, Geoffrey (2016). “Two Ideas of Creativity.” Martin Hinton, ed. Evidence, Experiment and Argument in Linguistics and Philosophy of Language. Bern: Peter Lang, 15–26.Google Scholar

  • Saussure, Ferdinand de (1916). Cours de Linguistique Générale. Paris: Payot. Bibliothèque Scientifique Payot.Google Scholar

  • Schneck, Peter (2018). “Creative Grammarians: Cognition, Language and Literature – An Exploratory Response.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66.3, 381–391.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Simonton, Dean Keith (2012). “Creative Productivity and Aging.” Susan Krauss Whitbourne and Martin J. Sliwinski, eds. The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Adulthood and Aging. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 477–496.Google Scholar

  • Sternberg, Robert J., James C. Kaufman, and Jean E. Pretz (2002). The Creativity Conundrum. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

  • Stockwell, Peter (2002). Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Trousdale, Graeme (2018). “Creativity Parallels between Language and Music.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66.3, 371–380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tsur, Reuven (2008). Toward a Theory of Cognitive Poetics. 2nd ed. Brighton and Portland: Sussex Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Turner, Mark (2017). “Opening Commentary: Polytropos and Communication in the Wild.” Barbara Dancygier, ed. The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 93–98.Google Scholar

  • Turner, Mark (2018). “The Role of Creativity in Construction Grammar.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66.3, 357–370.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Turner, Mark and Gilles Fauconnier (1999). “A Mechanism of Creativity.” Poetics Today 20.3, 397–418.Google Scholar

  • Uhrig, Peter (2018). “I don’t want to go all Yoko Ono on you: Creativity and Variation in a Family of Constructions.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66.3, 295–308.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ungerer, Friedrich and Hans-Jörg Schmid (2011). An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. Harlow: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar

  • van Eecke, Paul and Katrien Beuls (2018). “Exploring the Creative Potential of Computational Construction Grammar.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66.3, 341–355.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-09-04

Published in Print: 2018-09-25


Citation Information: Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, Volume 66, Issue 3, Pages 259–276, ISSN (Online) 2196-4726, ISSN (Print) 0044-2305, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2018-0024.

Export Citation

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Alexander Bergs
Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 2018, Volume 66, Number 3, Page 277
[2]
Thomas Herbst
Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 2018, Volume 66, Number 3, Page 309
[3]
Graeme Trousdale
Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 2018, Volume 66, Number 3, Page 371
[4]
Paul Van Eecke and Katrien Beuls
Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 2018, Volume 66, Number 3, Page 341
[5]
Peter Uhrig
Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 2018, Volume 66, Number 3, Page 295
[6]
Hendrik De Smet
Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 2018, Volume 66, Number 3, Page 329

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in