Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik

A Quarterly of Language, Literature and Culture

[Journal of English and American Studies]

Ed. by Butter, Michael / Eckstein, Lars / Frenk, Joachim / Georgi-Findlay, Brigitte / Herbst, Thomas / Korte, Barbara / Leypoldt, Günter / Reinfandt, Christoph / Stefanowitsch, Anatol

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2017: 0.07

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.123
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.323

Online
ISSN
2196-4726
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 66, Issue 3

Issues

The Role of Creativity in Multimodal Construction Grammar

Mark Turner
  • Corresponding author
  • Case Western Reserve University, Cognitive Science, 607 Crawford Hall, 10900 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2018-09-04 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2018-0030

Abstract

Construction Grammar accepts responsibility to account for forms of creativity otherwise almost entirely ignored in linguistics. This commitment is wise, given that creativity is the engine that develops systems of communication. Blending is the main mechanism of this creativity.

Works Cited

  • Barðdal, Jóhanna, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer, and Spike Gildea, eds. (2015). Diachronic Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Boas, Hans C. (2003). A Constructional Approach to Resultatives. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar

  • Boas, Hans C. (2017). “Computational Resources: FrameNet and Constructicon.” Barbara Dancygier, ed. The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 549–573.Google Scholar

  • Fauconnier, Gilles and Mark Turner (1996). “Blending as a Central Process of Grammar.” Adele Goldberg, ed. Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI).Google Scholar

  • Fauconnier, Gilles and Mark Turner (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

  • Fillmore, Charles J. and Beryl T. Atkins (1992). “Towards a Frame-Based Organization of the Lexicon: The Semantics of RISK and its Neighbors.” Adrienne Lehrer and Eva Kittay, eds. Frames, Fields and Contrast: New Essays in Semantics and Lexical Organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 75–102.Google Scholar

  • Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay, and Mary Catherine O’Connor (1988). “Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone.” Language 64.3, 501–538.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goldberg, Adele (1994). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Hilpert, Martin (2013). Constructional Change in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hoffmann, Thomas and Graeme Trousdale, eds. (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Israel, Michael (1996). “The Way Constructions Grow.” Adele Goldberg, ed. Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language. Stanford: CSLI, 217–230.Google Scholar

  • Kemmer, Suzanne and Arie Verhagen (1994). “The Grammar of Causatives and the Structure of Events.” Cognitive Linguistics 5.2, 115–156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kenner, Hugh (1954). “Introduction.” Hugh Kenner, ed. Ezra Pound: Translations. New York: New Directions, 9–17.Google Scholar

  • Nesset, Tore, Anna Endresen, Laura Janda, Anastasia Makarova, Francis Steen, and Mark Turner (2013). “How ‘Here’ and ‘Now’ in Russian and English Establish Joint Attention in TV News Broadcasts.” Russian Linguistics 37, 229–251.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Nikiforidou, Kiki (2012). “The Constructional Underpinnings of Viewpoint Blends: The Past + Now in Language and Literature.” Barbara Dancygier and Eve Sweetser, eds. Viewpoint and Perspective in Language and Gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 177–197.Google Scholar

  • Perek, Florent (2018). “Recent Change in the Productivity and Schematicity of the Way-Construction: A Distributional Semantic Analysis.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 14.1, 65–97.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Steen, Francis F., Anders Hougaard, Jungseock Joo, Inés Olza, Cristóbal Pagán Cánovas, Anna Pleshakova, Soumya Ray, Peter Uhrig, Javier Valenzuela, Jacek Woźny, and Mark Turner, eds. (2018). “Toward an Infrastructure for Data-driven Multimodal Communication Research.” Linguistics Vanguard 4.1, 1–9.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Tomasello, Michael (2003). Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Turner, Mark (1996). The Literary Mind: The Origins of Thought and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Turner, Mark (1998). “Figure.” Cristina Cacciari, Ray Gibbs, Jr., and Albert Katz, eds. Figurative Language and Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 44–87.Google Scholar

  • Turner, Mark (2008). “Frame Blending.” Rema Rossini Favretti, ed. Frames, Corpora, and Knowledge Representation. Bologna: Bononia University Press, 13–32.Google Scholar

  • Turner, Mark (2017a). “Multimodal Form-Meaning Pairs for Blended Classic Joint Attention.” Linguistics Vanguard 3.s1, 1–7.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Turner, Mark (2017b). “Slavic Red Hen, or, Laura Janda and the Dream of the Multimodal Constructicon.” Anastasia Makarova, Stephen M. Dickey, and Dagmar Divjak, eds. Each Venture a New Beginning: Studies in Honor of Laura A. Janda. Bloomington, Ind: Slavica, 387–400.Google Scholar

  • Turner, Mark and Gilles Fauconnier (1995). “Conceptual Integration and Formal Expression.” Journal of Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10.3, 183–204.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-09-04

Published in Print: 2018-09-25


Citation Information: Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, Volume 66, Issue 3, Pages 357–370, ISSN (Online) 2196-4726, ISSN (Print) 0044-2305, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2018-0030.

Export Citation

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Thomas Hoffmann
Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 2018, Volume 66, Number 3, Page 259

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in