Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik

Deutsche Sprache in Gegenwart und Geschichte

Ed. by Ágel, Vilmos / Feilke, Helmuth / Linke, Angelika / Lüdeling, Anke / Tophinke, Doris

3 Issues per year


Cite Score 2016: 0.14

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.139
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.356

Online
ISSN
1613-0626
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 37, Issue 2

Issues

Zum Stellenwert von Dialekt und Standard im österreichischen und Schweizer Alltag – Ergebnisse einer Umfrage

Andrea Ender / Irmtraud Kaiser
Published Online: 2009-10-16 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ZGL.2009.018

Abstract

Sociolinguistic variation in Austria and the German-speaking part of Switzerland has traditionally been described in very different terms. In Austria, the linguistic range between the standard language and the local dialects has been referred to as a ‘standard-dialect-continuum’, whereas the German-speaking part of Switzerland has often been cited as the typical example of a ‘diglossic’ language community. The sociolinguistic situation in the Austrian state of Vorarlberg, which is part of a primarily Bavarian-speaking country but also of the Alemannic dialect region, has not been thoroughly examined in any studies up to date.

In this paper, we present results from an online-survey in Austria and Switzerland on the everyday use of dialect and the standard language. According to our informants' estimates, the sociolinguistic situation in both Austria and German-speaking Switzerland is characterised by a significant percentage of dialect use. Still, the standard language is regarded quite differently in the two countries. A considerable proportion of the Swiss informants perceive the standard language as a ‘foreign language’. However, this does not seem to be a common attitude among the Austrian informants. The main difference between the two countries lies in the observation that Austrians feel they use an intermediate form between dialect and the standard language, a so-called ‘Umgangssprache’, in many situations, whereas the Swiss indicate that they speak their local dialect or the standard language under specific communicative circumstances. However, the German-speaking Swiss population, as well as the informants from Vorarlberg, do not seem to use an intermediate form. The situation in Vorarlberg is particularly interesting. On the one hand, as far as the status of dialect and the dichotomy of dialect and standard are concerned, Vorarlberg patterns similarly to the German-speaking part of Switzerland. On the other hand, people from Vorarlberg have to adapt to their Bavarian-speaking fellow countrymen and women and switch to standard German in intra-national communication (e.g. at the workplace or on national help lines).

About the article

Adresse der Verfasserinnen: Andrea Ender, Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Bern, Länggassstrasse 49, CH-3000 Bern 9. E-Mail:

Adresse der Verfasserinnen: Irmtraud Kaiser, Departement für Mehrsprachigkeitsforschung, Universität Fribourg, Criblet 13, CH-1700 Fribourg. E-Mail :


Published Online: 2009-10-16

Published in Print: 2009-09-01


Citation Information: Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik, Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 266–295, ISSN (Online) 1613-0626, ISSN (Print) 0301-3294, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ZGL.2009.018.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Irmtraud Kaiser and Gudrun Kasberger
First Language, 2018, Page 014272371876140

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in