Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …
Open access from 2017!

Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft

2 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.563
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.686

CiteScore 2017: 0.38

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.241
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.716

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1613-3706
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 28, Issue 2

Issues

Die Präferenztheorie in der historischen Phonologie aus junggrammatischer Perspektive

Eugen Hill
Published Online: 2009-10-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ZFSW.2009.026

Abstract

The paper deals with the so-called Preference Theory developed in the works of Theo Vennemann and Robert Murray within the scope of historical phonology. The first part of the paper examines the constituting assumptions and claims of the theory. The goal of the preference-based historical phonology – uncovering the motivation for sound changes which the Neogrammarian methodology can merely describe – will be achieved only if the universal preferences are reliably established. It is shown that the procedures which are employed to extract the universal preferences from empirical data do not lead to reliable results. The reason for this is the failure of the Preference Theory to distinguish in a non-arbitrary way between the alleged universally preferred structures and the mere by-products of sound changes with different or unknown motivation. The second part of the paper examines a recently suggested modification of the traditional notion of the exceptionlessness of sound changes. According to Vennemann, the traditional exceptionless sound changes are in fact to be considered as non-exclusive tendencies towards universally more preferred phonological structures. The paper shows that this position is neither based on the core assumptions of the Preference Theory nor supported by the adduced empirical evidence.

Keywords:: historical phonology; preference laws for syllable structure; sound laws; regularity of sound change; Neogrammarian controversy

About the article

Received: 2007-01-13

Revised: 2009-02-16

Published Online: 2009-10-13

Published in Print: 2009-10-01


Citation Information: Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 231–263, ISSN (Online) 1613-3706, ISSN (Print) 0721-9067, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ZFSW.2009.026.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Daniel Kölligan
Historical Linguistics, 2017, Volume 130, Number 1, Page 42

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in