Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie

The German Journal of Economic Geography

Editor-in-Chief: Henn, Sebastian / Thomi, Walter / Bathelt, Harald


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.864
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.955

CiteScore 2018: 0.94

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.565
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.444

Online
ISSN
2365-7693
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 63, Issue 2-4

Issues

Operationalising relational theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems at city-level in Africa, Asia and the Middle East

Nadina Iacob / Nicolas Friederici
  • Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society Französische Straße 9 10117 Berlin Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford 1 St Giles 1 St Giles Oxford Oxford OX1 3JS United Kingdom Berlin Germany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Jan Lachenmayer
Published Online: 2019-11-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw-2018-0017

Abstract

Relational theory has been a key advancement in understanding how entrepreneurial ecosystems work. However, the theory has not yet been operationalised through measurement methodologies. This study proposes an indicator-based framework and composite index methodology which builds on relational ecosystem theory. Starting from the premise that common aggregation methods like the arithmetic mean fail to convey the interdependence of ecosystem components (such as complementarity vs. substitution), this study explores the potential of geometric mean as an alternative approach. Our analysis shows that geometric mean methods render more plausible results than simple arithmetic mean; they operationalise complementarity between components more directly by introducing heftier penalties for imbalances in the ecosystem. Additionally, our methodology identifies the less-explored city-level as the most meaningful unit of analysis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. To test the index, we use a unique set of quantitative data for eleven middle-income cities, namely Accra, Amman, Bangkok, Beirut, Bengaluru, Cairo, Jakarta, Manila, Nairobi, Rabat, and Tunis. As most previously conducted measurements have targeted either mature or country ecosystems, our goal is not limited to methodological advancements in measuring entrepreneurial ecosystems, but it also relates to expanding the current status of research to less explored world regions.

7 References

  • Acs, Z. J. et al. (2017a). ‘The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach’, Small Business Economics, 49(1), pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9864-8.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Ács, Z. J. et al. (2017b). ‘The Global Entrepreneurship Index’. Washington D.C. Available at: https://thegedi.org.Google Scholar

  • Alvedalen, J. and Boschma, R. (2017). ‘A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: towards a future research agenda’, European Planning Studies, 25(6), pp. 887–903. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Aspen Network of Development Entrepreneurs. (2013) Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Diagnostic Toolkit. Available at: https://assets.aspeninstitute.org/content/uploads/files/content/docs/pubs/FINAL%20Ecosystem%20Toolkit%20Draft_print%20version.pdf (Accessed at: 29 August 2018).Google Scholar

  • Audretsch, D. B. and Belitski, M. (2017). ‘Entrepreneurial Ecosystems in Cities – Establishing the Framework Conditions’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5). doi: 10.1007/s1096101694738.Google Scholar

  • Autio, E. et al. (2017). ‘Digital Affordances, Spatial Affordances, and the Genesis of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems’, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, R. and Mason, C. (2017). ‘Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems’, Small Business Economics, 49(1), pp. 11–30. doi: 10.1007/s11187-017-9865-7.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Bruns, K. et al. (2017). ‘Searching for the existence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: a regional cross-section growth regression approach’, Small Bus Economics, 49, pp. 31–54. doi: 10.1007/s11187-017-9866-6.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Cerulli, G. and Filippetti, A. (2010). ‘Substitutability vs. Complementarity: Rethinking STI Composite Indicators Building with an Application of Sensitivity Analysis’, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier, 2(6), pp. 7633–7635. doi: 10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2010.05.153.Google Scholar

  • Cohen, B. (2006). ‘Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems’, Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(1), pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.428.Google Scholar

  • Credit, K., Mack, E. A., & Mayer, H. (2018). State of the field: Data and metrics for geographic analyses of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Geography compass, e12380.Google Scholar

  • Fritsch, M. and Wyrwich, M. (2014). ‘The Long Persistence of Regional Levels of Entrepreneurship: Germany, 1925–2005’, Regional Studies, 48(6), pp. 955–973. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.816414.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (2018). ‘About – GEM Wiki’. Available at: https://www.gemconsortium.org/about/news (Accessed at: 29 August 2018).Google Scholar

  • Guzman, J., Stern, S. (2016), ‘Nowcasting And Placecasting Entrepreneurial Quality And Performance’.Google Scholar

  • Isenberg, D. (2011). The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Strategy as a New Paradigm for Economic Policy: Principles for Cultivating Entrepreneurship, Babson Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Project. Available at: http://entrepreneurial-revolution.com/2011/05/11/the-entrepreneurship-ecosystem-strategy-as-a-new-paradigm-for-economic-policy-principles-for-cultivating-entrepreneurship/ (Accessed: 10 March 2018).Google Scholar

  • Isenberg, D. J. (2014). ‘What an Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Actually Is’, Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar

  • Kalla, S. (2009). Geometric Mean. Retrieved Jul 29, 2018 from Explorable.com: https://explorable.com/geometric-mean, date accessed: 5 August 2018.Google Scholar

  • KumarSen, P. (1987). What do the arithmetic, geometric and harmonic means tell us in length-biased sampling?, Statistics & Probability Letters, Volume 5, Issue 2, March 1987, pp 95–98.Google Scholar

  • Liao J. G., Arthur Berg. (2018). Sharpening Jensen’s Inequality. The American Statistician, pp 1–4.Google Scholar

  • Mack, E. and Mayer, H. (2016). ‘The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems’, Urban Studies, 53(10), pp. 2118–2133. doi: 10.1177/0042098015586547.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Mason, C. and Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Growth Oriented Entrepreneurship. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/Entrepreneurial-ecosystems.pdf (Accessed: 16 March 2018).Google Scholar

  • Motoyama, Y. and Knowlton, K. (2017). ‘Examining the Connections within the Startup Ecosystem: A Case Study of St. Louis’, Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 7(1). doi: 10.1515/erj-2016-0011.Google Scholar

  • Motoyama, Y. and Watkins, K. K. (2014). Examining the Connections within the Startup Ecosystem: A Case Study of St. Louis. Kansas City. Available at: https://www.kauffman.org/what-we-do/research/a-research-compendium-entrepreneurship-ecosystems/examining-the-connections-within-the-startup-ecosystem-a-case-study-of-st-louis (Accessed: 22 March 2018).Google Scholar

  • Neck, H. M., Meyer, G. D., Cohen, B., & Corbett, A. C. (2004). ‘An Entrepreneurial System View of New Venture Creation’, Journal of Small Business Management, 42(2), 190–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2004.00105.x.Google Scholar

  • Nicotra, M. et al. (2017). ‘The causal relation between entrepreneurial ecosystem and productive entrepreneurship: a measurement framework’, The Journal of Technology Transfer, pp. 1–34. doi: 10.1007/s10961-017-9628-2.Google Scholar

  • OECD and European Commission Joint Research Center. (2008). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators METHODOLOGY AND USER GUIDE. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/std/42495745.pdf (Accessed: 10 March 2017).Google Scholar

  • Ortega Argiles, R, Acs, ZJ, Szerb, L, Autio, E & Komlosi, E. (2014). ‘REDI: The Regional Entrepreneurship and Development Index –Measuring regional entrepreneurship’. Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2776/79241.Google Scholar

  • Spigel, B. (2017). ‘The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), pp. 49–72. doi: 10.1111/etap.12167.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Spigel, B. and Harrison, R. (2017). ‘Towards a Process Theory of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems’, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. doi: 10.1002/sej.1268.Google Scholar

  • Stam, E. (2015). ‘Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique’, European Planning Studies, 23(9), pp. 1759–1769. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Stam, E. & Spigel, B. (2018). ‘Entrepreneurial Ecosystems’, In: Blackburn, R., De Clercq, D., & Heinonen, J. (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Small Business and Entrepreneurship. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

  • Startup Genome. (2018). ‘Global Startup Ecosystem Report 2018. Succeeding in the New Era of Technology. Available at: https://startupgenome.com (Accessed: 16 March 2018).Google Scholar

  • Sternberger et al. (2018) ‘A new framework to measure entrepreneurial ecosystems at the regional level’. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie. pp. 1–25.Google Scholar

  • The Kauffmann Index (2018). https://www.kauffman.org/kauffman-index (Accessed: 28 August 2018).Google Scholar

  • World Economic Forum. (2014). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems around the Globe and Early-Stage Company Growth Dynamics – Reports – World Economic Forum. Available at: http://reports.weforum.org/entrepreneurial-ecosystems-around-the-globe-and-early-stage-company-growth-dynamics/ (Accessed: 22 March 2018).Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-03-31

Accepted: 2019-12-04

Published Online: 2019-11-13

Published in Print: 2019-11-01


Citation Information: Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, Volume 63, Issue 2-4, Pages 79–102, ISSN (Online) 2365-7693, ISSN (Print) 0044-3751, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw-2018-0017.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in