Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie

The German Journal of Economic Geography

Editor-in-Chief: Henn, Sebastian / Thomi, Walter / Bathelt, Harald


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.864
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.955

CiteScore 2018: 0.94

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.565
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.444

Online
ISSN
2365-7693
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 63, Issue 2-4

Issues

Applying the concept of entrepreneurial ecosystems in Estonia

Merli Reidolf
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Business Administration Tallinn University of Technology Ehitajate tee 5 Tallinn 19086 Estonia Tallinn Estonia
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Merle Küttim
  • Department of Business Administration Tallinn University of Technology Ehitajate tee 5 19086 Tallinn Tallinn Estonia
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Aleksandr Michelson / Helena Rozeik
  • Department of Business Administration Tallinn University of Technology Ehitajate tee 5 19086 Tallinn Tallinn Estonia
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Marianne Kallaste
  • Department of Business Administration Tallinn University of Technology Ehitajate tee 5 19086 Tallinn Tallinn Estonia
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2019-11-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw-2018-0028

Abstract

Similar to natural ecosystems, entrepreneurs and other entrepreneurial actors are locally interdependent and affect the performance of each other. Mostly economically larger and more successful regions have been studied by using the framework of entrepreneurial ecosystems (EEs). The current study aims at further developing the theoretical understanding of EEs and applying the proposed EE model in the context of Estonia. In the study, a conceptual model of an EE is proposed, the uniqueness of which lies in merging three aspects into a single framework: the nine components of an EE, its value-added, and its phase of development. The model was applied for analysing by means of a qualitative methodology four sector-based subEEs in Estonia.

The study showed that even in a small country like Estonia the components of the EE were partly similar, but also partly unique for the subEEs. This was not due to the location, but because of sectoral differences. The difference of the development phase seemed to be related to the knowledge base of the sector.

The policy relevance of the model is that it allows looking at the elements of an EE as well as its economic value-added and development prospects. The EE approach allows addressing jointly the difficulties and challenges in the development of EEs, including the issues of digitalisation, skilled labour, and production costs, which would allow the subEEs to develop into mature and resilient networks. Not all the components of an EE have to be equally strong, but their interconnectedness determines the strength of an EE. Policy solutions need to be tailored to the needs of specific subEEs based on the knowledge base and inner dynamics of the sectors.

Keywords: entrepreneurial ecosystems; Estonia; knowledge base

JEL Classification: L26; O31; R12

The article is based on a study commissioned by Foresight Centre of Parliament of Estonia and forms a part of the development of the productivity scenarios and looks for possibilities for increasing the level of competitiveness of Estonian enterprises during the next 10–15 years. The study was conducted in cooperation with Tallinn University of Technology and Praxis Centre for Policy Studies.

References

  • Asheim, B. T./Gertler, M. S. (2005): The geography of innovation: regional innovation systems. In: Fagerberg, J./Mowery D.C./Nelson R. (Eds.): The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford, 291–317.Google Scholar

  • Asheim, B. T./Coenen, L./Vang, J. (2007): Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge bases: sociospatial implications for learning, innovation, and innovation policy. In: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25(5), 655–670.Google Scholar

  • Aspen Network of Development Entrepreneurs (ANDE). (2013): Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Diagnostic Toolkit. Aspen Network of Development Entrepreneurs.Google Scholar

  • Audretsch, D. B./Belitski, M. (2017): Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: establishing the framework conditions. In: The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1030–1051 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8Google Scholar

  • Boschma, R. (2005): Role of proximity in interaction and performance: Conceptual and empirical challenges. In: Regional Studies, 39(1), 41–45.Google Scholar

  • Brown, R./Mason, C. (2017): Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems. In: Small Business Economics, 49(1), 11–30 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9865-7Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Cukier, D./Kon, F./Krueger, N. (2015): Towards a Software Startup Ecosystems Maturity Model, PROFES’2015 Workshop on Software Startups. Bolzano, 600–606. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8edb/9fff98fa7fe91006d9ed3966b28b2bc037f4.pdfGoogle Scholar

  • GEM 2016/2017 Global Report. (2017): The Global Entrepreneurship Research Association (GERA). http://www.gemconsortium.org/report/49812Google Scholar

  • GEDI. Global Entrepreneurship Index 2017. (2017): The Global Entrepreneurship and Development Institute (GEDI), Washington, D.C., USA. http://thegedi.org/product/2017-global-entrepreneurship-index/Google Scholar

  • Hsieh, H. F./Shannon, S. E. (2005): Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. In: Qual. Health Res., 15 (9), 1277–1288.Google Scholar

  • Isaksen, A. (2005): Regional clusters building on local and non- local relationships: a European comparison. In: A. Lagendijk, A./Oinas, P. (Eds.): Proximity, Distance and Diversity: Issues on Economic Interaction and Local Development. Aldershot, 129–152.Google Scholar

  • Isenberg, D. (2011): The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Strategy as a New Paradigm for Economic Policy: Principles for Cultivating Entrepreneurship. Dublin.Google Scholar

  • Lagerspetz, M. (2017) Ühiskonna uurimise meetodid: sissejuhatus ja väljajuhatus. Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikooli Kirjastus.Google Scholar

  • Mack, E./Mayer, H. (2016): The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Urban Studies, 53(10), 2118–2133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015586547Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Malecki, E. J. (2018): Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Geography Compass (In Press). https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12359Google Scholar

  • Mason, C/Brown, R. (2014): Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Background paper prepared for the workshop organised by the OECD LEED Programme and the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs on Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Growth Oriented Entrepreneurship. The Hague.Google Scholar

  • Miles, M. B./Huberman, M. A./Saldaña, J. (2014) Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar

  • Nicotra, M./Romano, M./Del Giudice, M./Schillaci, C. E. (2017): The Causal Relation Between Entrepreneurial Ecosystem and Productive Entrepreneurship. In: The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10961-017-9628-2Google Scholar

  • Raudsaar, M. (2010): Silicon Valley ökosüsteem, selle kasutus- ja rakendusvõimalused Eestis. Fenomenoloogiline uurimus. Silicon Valley; Tartu.Google Scholar

  • Roundy, P. T. (2017): “Small town” entrepreneurial ecosystems: Implications for developed and emerging economies. In: Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 9(3), 238–262 https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-09-2016-0040Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Spigel, B./Harrison, R. (2017): Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. In: Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1268Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Spigel, B. (2017): The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Stam, E. (2015): Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Sternberger, Bloh, Coduras (2019): A new framework to measure entrepreneurial ecosystems at the regional level. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, xx(x), xx-xx. DOI…Google Scholar

  • The Global Competitiveness Report 2017–2018. (2017): World Economic Forum. Geneva. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-competitiveness-report-2017-2018Google Scholar

  • Tödtling, F./Grillitsch, M. (2014): Does combinatorial knowledge lead to a better innovation performance of firms? In: SRE – Discussion Papers, 2014/07. WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna.Google Scholar

  • Tödtling, F./Trippl, M. (2005): Networking and project organisation in the Styrian automotive industry. In: Lagendijk, A./Oinas, P. (Eds.): Proximity, Distance and Diversity: Issues on Eco- nomic Interaction and Local Development. Aldershot, 89–110.Google Scholar

  • World Economic Forum (WEF). (2013): Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Around the Globe and Company Growth Dynamics. Report Summary for the Annual Meeting of the New Champions 2013. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_EntrepreneurialEcosystems_Report_2013.pdfGoogle Scholar

  • World Economic Forum (WEF). (2014): Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Around the Globe and Early-Stage Company Growth Dynamics. Geneva: World Economic Forum. http://reports.weforum.org/entrepreneurial-ecosystems-around-the-globe-and-early-stage-company-growth-dynamics/wp-content/blogs.dir/34/mp/files/pages/files/nme-entrepreneurship-report-jan-8-2014.pdfGoogle Scholar

  • Yin, R.K. (2009): Case Study Research. Design and Methods, 4th ed. Los Angeles.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-10-23

Accepted: 2019-08-30

Published Online: 2019-11-13

Published in Print: 2019-11-01


Citation Information: Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, Volume 63, Issue 2-4, Pages 134–145, ISSN (Online) 2365-7693, ISSN (Print) 0044-3751, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw-2018-0028.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in