Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik

Ed. by Donges, Juergen B. / Krause, Michael / Roth, Steffen J. / Watrin, Christian

Online
ISSN
2366-0317
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 67, Issue 1

Issues

Was spricht gegen Zwei-Klassen-Medizin?

Friedrich Breyer
  • Corresponding author
  • Universität Konstanz, FB Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Postfach 135, 78457 Konstanz Germany, Tel.: (07531) 88–2568
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2018-05-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfwp-2018-0005

Abstract:

In Germany, there is a lively debate on a so-called „two-class-medicine“, meaning that privately insured persons get better medical treatment than sickness fund members. As an economist, the author is not in a position to judge whether this is true. However, the co-existence of social and private health insurance (GKV and PKV) constitutes a „two-class-health insurance“, which leads to severe inequities in the distribution of the financial burden of illness. In this article it is shown that there are legal ways to address and eliminate these inequities without abolishing the private health insurance system altogether. The instruments are the inclusion of private health insurance in the risk adjustment scheme of the sickness funds and the transformation of the GKV contributions into flat per-person amounts, independent of earnings, accompanied by a tax-financed compensation for families with below-average income, as in Switzerland and the Netherlands. Interestingly, this second reform proposal has been vigorously opposed by all leftist parties ever since, who fight for the chimaera of a „people's insurance“, which sounds good but cannot be implemented in a legal way and, moreover, would not even eliminate „two-class-medicine“.

Literatur

  • Frerich, J. und M. Frey (1996), Handbuch der Geschichte der Sozialpolitik in Deutschland, Bd. 1: Von der vorindustriellen Zeit bis zum Ende des Dritten Reiches, 2. Aufl., München, Wien: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar

  • Loskamp, N. u. a. (2017), Medizinisch-technischer Fortschritt als Ergebnis des Systemwettbewerbs zwischen GKV und PKV, Gesellschaftspolitische Kommentare, Sonderausgabe 1/2017, Berlin/Bonn.Google Scholar

  • McGuire, T.G. (2000), Physician Agency, in: Handbook of Health Economics, Vol. 1, Amsterdam, S. 461–536.Google Scholar

  • Rice, T. (2012), The physician as the patient's agent, in: A.M. Jones (Hg.), The Elgar Companion to Health Economics, 2nd ed., Cheltenham, S. 271–279.Google Scholar

  • Schmitz, H. and N. R. Ziebarth (2017), „Does Price Framing Affect the Consumer Price Sensitivity of Health Plan Choice?“, Journal of Human Resources 52, S. 89–128.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-05-01


Citation Information: Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages 30–41, ISSN (Online) 2366-0317, ISSN (Print) 0721-3808, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfwp-2018-0005.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in