Zeitschrift für Kristallographie - Crystalline Materials
Editor-in-Chief: Pöttgen, Rainer
Ed. by Antipov, Evgeny / Bismayer, Ulrich / Boldyreva, Elena V. / Huppertz, Hubert / Petrícek, Václav / Tiekink, E. R. T.
IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 2.560
Rank 8 out of 26 in category Cristallography in the 2015 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.827
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 1.198
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 1.834
Charge flipping combined with histogram matching to solve complex crystal structures from powder diffraction data
Citation Information: Zeitschrift für Kristallographie. Volume 222, Issue 2, Pages 47–53, ISSN (Print) 0044-2968, DOI: 10.1524/zkri.2007.222.2.47, September 2009
- Published Online:
The charge-flipping structure-solution algorithm introduced by Oszlányi and Süto in 2004 has been adapted to accommodate powder diffraction data. In particular, a routine for repartitioning the intensities of overlapping reflections has been implemented within the iterative procedure. This is done by modifiying the electron density map with a histogram-matching algorithm, and then using the Fourier coefficients obtained from this map to repartition the structure factor amplitudes within each overlap group. The effectiveness of the algorithm has been demonstrated with five test examples covering different classes of materials of varying complexity (ZSM-5 ([Si96O192]), cimetidine (C10H16N6S), a polysalicylide ((C7O2H)6), the low-temperature modification of 4-methylpyridine-N-oxide (C6H7NO) with 8 molecules in the asymmetric unit, and a zirconium phosphate phase (|(C5H6N)4 (H2O)2| [Zr12P16O60(OH)4F8])). It was also used to solve the structure of a layer silicate (|(CH3)4N)8 (H2O)20| [Si24 O56]), whose space group was unclear. These structures, with 17–64 non-H atoms in the asymmetric unit (68–288 in the unit cell), could all be solved in a straightforward manner. Histogram matching proved to be an essential component of the algorithm for the more complex structures. The clear advantages of the charge-flipping algorithm are that (1) all calculations are performed in P1, so space group ambiguities, which are common with powder diffraction data, are irrelevant, (2) no chemical information such as bond distances, bond angles, or connectivity are required, so there is no danger of making incorrect assumptions about the structure, (3) it is equally effective for both organic and inorganic structures, and (4) it is fast, requiring only seconds to minutes per run.
Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.