Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C

A Journal of Biosciences

Editor-in-Chief: Seibel, Jürgen

Editorial Board Member: Aigner , Achim / Boland, Wilhelm / Bornscheuer, Uwe / Hoffmann, Klaus

12 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.835

CiteScore 2016: 0.72

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.222
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.413

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 71, Issue 9-10 (Sep 2016)


Permanent colonization of creek sediments, creek water and limnic water plants by four Listeria species in low population densities

Evi Lang-Halter
  • Lehrstuhl für Mikrobielle Ökologie, Zentralinstitut für Lebensmittel- und Ernährungsforschung ZIEL, Technische Universität München, Weihenstephaner Berg 3, D-85354 Freising, Germany
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Steffen Schober
  • Institute of Communications Engineering, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 43, 89081 Ulm, Germany
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Siegfried Scherer
  • Corresponding author
  • Lehrstuhl für Mikrobielle Ökologie, Zentralinstitut für Lebensmittel- und Ernährungsforschung ZIEL, Technische Universität München, Weihenstephaner Berg 3, D-85354 Freising, Germany, Phone: +49 08161 713516, Fax: +49 08161 714492
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2016-09-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-2016-0114


During a 1-year longitudinal study, water, sediment and water plants from two creeks and one pond were sampled monthly and analyzed for the presence of Listeria species. A total of 90 % of 30 sediment samples, 84 % of 31 water plant samples and 67 % of 36 water samples were tested positive. Generally, most probable number counts ranged between 1 and 40 g−1, only occasionally >110 cfu g−1 were detected. Species differentiation based on FT-IR spectroscopy and multiplex PCR of a total of 1220 isolates revealed L. innocua (46 %), L. seeligeri (27 %), L. monocytogenes (25 %) and L. ivanovii (2 %). Titers and species compositions were similar during all seasons. While the species distributions in sediments and associated Ranunculus fluitans plants appeared to be similar in both creeks, RAPD typing did not provide conclusive evidence that the populations of these environments were connected. It is concluded that (i) the fresh-water sediments and water plants are year-round populated by Listeria, (ii) no clear preference for growth in habitats as different as sediments and water plants was found and (iii) the RAPD-based intraspecific biodiversity is high compared to the low population density.

This article offers supplementary material which is provided at the end of the article.

Keywords: biodiversity; fresh water; Listeria monocytogenes; Listeria spp.; sediment; water plants

Dedication: This work is dedicated to the memory of Professor Peter Böger. His continuous support and thoughtful guidance over many years encouraged the senior author to aim at an academic career in microbial ecology and evolutionary biology.

1 Introduction

The genus Listeria consists of the species Listeria monocytogenes, L. innocua, L. seeligeri, L. ivanovii, L. welshimeri, L. grayi [1], L. marthii [2], L. rocourtiae [3], L. fleischmannii [4] and L. weihenstephanensis [5]. The species L. floridensis, L. aquatica, L. cornellensis, L. riparia, L. grandensis [6], L. booriae and L. newyorkensis [7] were validly described recently. L. monocytogenes is a zoonotic facultative pathogen responsible for severe infections with high mortality rates in susceptible population groups such as infants, pregnant women, immune compromised and elderly persons [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. Owing to its ability to overcome food preservation barriers such as low temperatures, low pH and high salt concentrations [13], the pathogen poses a potential risk to human health. Especially the cold-tolerant nature of L. monocytogenes is an important parameter for infection by contaminated food since low initial numbers of the bacterium can grow to infective doses even in the refrigerator of consumers.

One source of L. monocytogenes are farm animals such as cows. A relationship between listeriosis in domestic animals and the feeding of low quality, improperly fermented silages with pH values >4.0 has been reported [14], [15]. L. monocytogenes is carried asymptomatically in silage-fed livestock and is dropped in feces [16]. Shedding of the pathogen by a variety of domestic animals like sheep and cattle has been reported [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. A possible route of infection into the human food chain, for instance, is through the ingestion of uncooked food plants grown on soils irrigated with contaminated water or via the consumption of vegetables cultivated on manure treated fields [21], [22], [23], [24]. Also, ready-to-eat food or dairy products that have not been pasteurized, such as raw milk cheese or smoked salmon pose significant risks to consumers. Due to its importance as a food-borne pathogen, numerous studies on this genus deal with the occurrence and tracing of L. monocytogenes in food processing plants and in farm environments [17], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30].

In early publications, a ubiquitous distribution and saprophytic nature of the genus Listeria has been suggested [31], [32]. L. monocytogenes has been isolated from different natural surroundings including soil [31], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], vegetation [24], [36], [37], surface water [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44] and wild animals [45], [46], [47], [48]. In general, systematic studies concerning the occurrence of L. monocytogenes in soil and fresh water are rare. Even less is known on the occurrence of the other species of Listeria in habitats different from farm environments and food processing plants (for a review, see Sauders and Wiedmann [49]). However, studying the ecology of Listeria is important because knowledge on environmental niches will help to understand contamination routes. Therefore, the objective of this work was to systematically evaluate the occurrence, intraspecific biodiversity, population density and temporal fluctuation of four Listeria species in the limnic habitats fresh water, water plants and sediment.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Sampling sites and sampling procedures

Samples were taken from (i) the creek Moosach in Freising, which discharges eastward into the river Isar, (ii) the creek Wolnzach in the city Wolnzach, a branch of the river Ilm, which discharges into the river Abens, which is a tributary of the river Danube, and (iii) the pond Postweiher in the city Wolnzach. The two creeks are separated by a water divide. The surrounding of the sampling site at Moosach was rural with meadows that had not been used as grazing land for more than 15 years. Manure from livestock operations had not been applied for many years. Thus, this site was not proximately influenced by cattle farming. In contrast, the sampling site at the creek Wolnzach was directly impacted by cattle grazing in the summer months since domestic animals were kept on an adjacent pasture. The pond Postweiher at Wolnzach is located within playing fields, streets and houses, but no cattle grazing areas were located nearby. The pond is fed by two subsurface wells and discharges into the creek Wolnzach upstream of the Wolnzach sampling site. The water levels of this pond were extremely variable over the sampling period. Due to high water levels from February to August, sampling of sediment was not feasible. In contrast to the creeks, water of this site was frozen in January and February.

Samples were collected monthly over a 1-year period. The sampled matrices were sediment, water plants and water. Also, the water temperature was recorded at every sampling. pH values of water and sediment samples were determined once according to the conventional pH-meter method VDLUFA I A 5.1.1 proposed by the Verband Deutscher Landwirtschaftlicher Untersuchungs- und Forschungsanstalten (VDLUFA Verlag, Darmstadt, Germany).

From the creeks Moosach and Wolnzach, the water plant investigated was Ranunculus fluitans. At the pond Postweiher, R. fluitans was not growing and the water plant flora varied over the sampling period. Therefore, water plants examined from Postweiher consisted of various genera: Lemna trisulca and Ceratophyllum spec. (October and July), Lemna trisulca (April, June, August and September), Mentha × piperita (February and March), Carex spec (January) and a representative of the Nymphaceae (May).

In total, 36 water samples, 30 sediment and 31 water plant samples were analyzed. Using sterile gloves, sediment samples were collected up to a depth of approximately 5 cm and transferred into sterile bags. Plants were gently rinsed to separate the roots from sediment traces before placing them into sterile bags. The root mass was below 1 % of the total mass of the plant sample. Plants were also investigated without roots. Water samples were collected using sterile glass flasks. All samples were transported at ambient temperature and analyzed within 2 h after sampling.

2.2 Determination of Listeria cell counts by most probable number (MPN)

For the enumeration of Listeria spp. from sediment and water plant matrices, two different selective enrichment media were compared in a preliminary test. The media tested were ½ Fraser broth (Sifin, Berlin, Germany) and UVM II broth (University of Vermont Medium according to the US Department of Agriculture, Oxoid, Wesel, Germany). Selective enrichments were performed according to § 64 LFGB DIN EN ISO 11290-2 applying the following modifications: 100 g of sample was added to 400 ml of ½ Fraser basis broth or UVM II broth, leaving out the selective media components. The water plant samples were minced using an Ultraturax machine (Janke Kunkel, Staufen, Germany). Samples were incubated 1 h at room temperature to permit resuscitation of stressed cells. Then, aliquots of the sample preparations were transferred to ½ Fraser broth or UVM II broth supplemented with corresponding selective agents producing 10-fold dilutions containing 10, 1 and 0.1 g of sample matrix. All dilution steps were prepared five-fold as specified in DIN EN ISO 7218:2005. Inoculated broth were stirred thoroughly and incubated 24 h at 30 °C. Of each enriched dilution sample, 50 µl was streaked onto PALCAM agar (Sifin, Berlin, Germany) and incubated at 30 °C for 24–48 h.

2.3 Confirmation of presumptive Listeria spp. and differentiation to the species level

From each PALCAM plate, well-detached presumptive Listeria colonies were picked and streaked onto tryptone soy agar (Oxoid, Wesel, Germany). After incubation for 24–48 h at 30 °C, confirmation was performed by examination under obliquely transmitted light. Atypical isolates were examined microscopically and by plating on LAOA agar [50]. Cell counts were determined according to DIN EN ISO 7218:2005 using MPN tables.

Differentiation to the species level was performed using FT-IR spectroscopy [51] and multiplex PCR [52]. Template DNA for the latter method was prepared as follows: cells were grown on tryptone soya agar for 48 h at 30 °C, half a loop (2 mm in diameter) of cells were collected and suspended in 200 µl sterile water containing 10–15 mg of zirconia/silica beads (0.1 mm in diameter; Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany). The suspension was treated twice for 45 s at 6.5 m/s in a ribolyser (PastPrep, Eschwege, Germany) at ambient temperature and subsequently heated for 5 min at 95 °C. After heating, a centrifugation step at 18,000× g for 10 min was performed. The supernatant was used for further analysis. Species determination of ambiguous isolates was investigated either by employing a commercial biochemical differentiation kit (API Listeria; bioMérieux, La Balme les Grottes, France) [53] or by 16S rDNA sequencing as described elsewhere [54].

2.4 RAPD typing of Listeria spp.

Subtyping of Listeria isolates was performed by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. The use of a combination of oligonucleotide primers in a single PCR reaction is suggested to provide more reproducible patterns [55], [56]. Therefore, three oligomer primers which had been successfully applied in other studies were used simultaneously. The primers were M13 (5′-GAG GGT GGC GGT TCT-3′) [57], Eric2 (5′-AAG TAA GTG ACT GGG GTG AGC G-3′) [58] and inlA.F (5′-CAG GCA GCT ACA ATT ACA CA-3′) [25]. These primers address different genomic regions: M13 is directed to sections containing micro- or mini-satellites, Eric.2 focuses repeated regions and inlA.F targets internalin genes [25]. RAPD PCR reactions were performed in a final volume of 25 µl containing 50–100 ng of template DNA, 3 µl of 10× PCR Buffer IV (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Dreieich, Germany), 1 mM dNTP Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 3.5 mM MgCl2, 6.25 pmol/µl of each primer and 0.5 U of Thermoprime Plus Taq Polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Reaction conditions were as follows: 94 °C for 2 min, 35 cycles, each at 94 °C for 1 min, 35 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 2 min. The final step was done 5 min at 72 °C. The PCR products were resolved by agarose gel electrophoresis (1.6 % w/v rotiagarose; Roth) in 0.5× TBE buffer (50 mM Tris, 45 mM boric acid, 0.5 mM EDTA, Roth) at 300 V for 1 h. After separation, DNA was visualized by UV light after staining with ethidium bromide (1 µg/ml). Image acquisition was carried out using an Image Station 440CF (Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA). To test reproducibility, from every isolate RAPD testing was performed twice applying cell lysate from two independent cultivations. One L. monocytogenes and one L. innocua strain with known RAPD band pattern served as positive controls for validation of PCR runs.

For normalization of gels and band detection, the TL120 software was used (biostep, Jahnsdorf, Germany). Parameters for band detection are listed in the Supplementary Table 2. For band pattern analysis, a database was established using biostep TL120DM software. Applying the mentioned parameters for band pattern analysis, UPGMA clusters of the control strains exhibited similarities ≥95 %. Pattern reproducibly differing by at least one band were defined as different RAPD types.

2.5 Statistical treatment of data

For the total numbers of Listeria isolates (Table 3 and Figure 1), mean values and standard deviations have been calculated (Figure 2). To consider outliers, median values are also given in Table 3. Generally, a very high variance was found in all data sets which is typical for longitudinal ecological studies. A potential relatedness of sediment and R. fluitans populations based on the RAPD patterns of the isolates was evaluated by estimating the P values using the exact Fisher test (data not shown).

Species composition of the Listeria populations in creek sediment and on water plants of three sampling sites determined in a longitudinal study. Numbers within the bars indicate the absolute numbers of isolates analyzed. s, sediment; R, R. fluitans; wp, water plants. Asterisks mark samples of sediment with corresponding R. fluitans specimen with apparently similar species compositions.
Figure 1:

Species composition of the Listeria populations in creek sediment and on water plants of three sampling sites determined in a longitudinal study. Numbers within the bars indicate the absolute numbers of isolates analyzed. s, sediment; R, R. fluitans; wp, water plants. Asterisks mark samples of sediment with corresponding R. fluitans specimen with apparently similar species compositions.

Average species composition of Listeria populations in three habitats of three sampling sites. Values expressed in % are given, covering a 1-year sampling period of fresh-water sediments, water plants and water. The species composition of water is based on five samples taken from Moosach and five samples taken from Wolnzach. Mean values and standard deviation are indicated. Species determination of water isolates from Postweiher was not performed. Note that considerable scattering is observed in the data which limits potential conclusions on significant differences in the habitats.
Figure 2:

Average species composition of Listeria populations in three habitats of three sampling sites. Values expressed in % are given, covering a 1-year sampling period of fresh-water sediments, water plants and water. The species composition of water is based on five samples taken from Moosach and five samples taken from Wolnzach. Mean values and standard deviation are indicated. Species determination of water isolates from Postweiher was not performed. Note that considerable scattering is observed in the data which limits potential conclusions on significant differences in the habitats.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Comparison of enrichment media

For enumeration, direct plating methods are suitable if Listeria populations >100 cfu/g are present in the sample matrix. For quantification of populations <100 cfu/g, an enrichment procedure followed by an MPN analysis is necessary. Although MPN methods are commonly used to quantify Listeria in food samples, reports on the use of MPN techniques in samples from natural environments are rare. Due to little information on the quantification of Listeria in natural habitats, MPN cell counts were first determined using the two enrichment media ½ Fraser broth and UVM II broth. Generally, both broths consisted of corresponding concentrations of components except for lithium chloride, which was absent from UVM II broth. The selective agents in ½ Fraser broth were acriflavine hydrochloric acid, ammonium ferric III sulfat and nalidixic acid, while selectivity in UVM II broth was achieved by cycloheximide, acriflavine hydrochloric acid and nalidixic acid. The ability of ½ Fraser and UVM II broth to promote growth of Listeria spp. was investigated by the examination of five sediment and five R. fluitans samples applying five-fold MPN approaches. Recovery was slightly higher using ½ Fraser broth for both tested sample types, although differences were not significant (data not shown). From each PALCAM plate with presumptive Listeria colonies, up to five colonies were picked and identified. The same Listeria species were isolated by the use of the tested enrichment media (data not shown). Based on these results, ½ Fraser broth and a three-fold MPN approach were used in the 1-year longitudinal study.

However, a note of caution has to be added since it is unknown whether any Listeria species may grow better than other species in the same sample during enrichment of sediment or plant samples. It has been reported that, during selective enrichment of food samples, growth of L. innocua is preferred over L. monocytogenes [59], [60]. However, it is unknown, whether this effect plays a role when natural samples are used for enrichment.

3.2 Year-round occurrence of the genus Listeria

Over the 12-month sampling period, water temperatures ranged between 6 °C in winter and 14 °C in summer at Moosach and Wolnzach, while surface water at Postweiher was largely frozen in winter and reached up to 18 °C in summer (Supplementary Figure 1). The pH values of water (pH 7.80) and sediment (pH 7.50) were similar in both Moosach and Wolnzach. In total, 30 sediment samples, 31 water plant samples and 36 water samples were analyzed for the presence of Listeria spp. After a one-step ½ Fraser broth selective enrichment procedure, 27 sediment samples (90 %), 26 water plant samples (84 %) and 24 water samples (67 %) were tested positive (Table 1). Compared to the high occurrence of Listeria spp. in water samples from Moosach and Wolnzach (100 and 83 %, respectively), the occurrence in water from Postweiher was low (25 %). The observed year-round occurrence is in accordance with the psychrotolerant nature of Listeria species.

Table 1:

Occurrence of Listeria spp. in sediments, on water plants and in water of two creeks (Moosach and Wolnzach) and one pond (Postweiher).

In other studies on the occurrence of Listeria spp. in natural habitats based on rather sporadic samplings, 6–90 % of the samples were tested positive (Table 2), but only few limnic environments have been investigated. The strikingly frequent occurrence of Listeria spp. in the three limnic habitats observed in this study confirms an early report of Welshimer and Donker-Voet [32] stating that fresh-water environments frequently harbor Listeria spp.

Table 2:

Occurrence of Listeria spp. in natural habitats.

It has been reported that the isolation frequency of Listeria from surface water was increased after heavy rainfalls, suggesting runoffs and washouts from surrounding surfaces to have a significant influence on the detection of Listeria in water [36], [38], [64]. Moreover, slope gradients have been reported to impact the detection of Listeria in water samples [35], [37], [67]. We found no indication that pelagic cell counts of Listeria are higher than cell counts on water plants and in sediment at all areas sampled. Run-off from adjacent surfaces due to rainy periods did probably not play an important role in these habitats, at least during the sampling performed in this study. This was in agreement with an occasional examination of adjacent soil and plant samples which tested only very rarely positive for Listeria spp. (data not shown). Our data, therefore, are in agreement with the hypothesis that Listeria spp. in sediments and on water plants are not allochthonous but form part of an autochthonous microbiota.

3.3 Cell counts of Listeria species

Listeria cell counts are listed in Table 3. Occasionally, Listeria cell counts above 110 MPN/g were found in sediment and on plant samples, but never in water. Due to these rare high cell counts, and comparatively low sample numbers, standard deviations were exceedingly high in this data set, which makes it difficult to tell whether the occurrence on water plants is higher than in sediments. Generally, Listeria titers did not change in an obvious pattern over the sampling period, indicating that in the habitats examined no clear seasonal trends occur. To our knowledge, data on the population density of Listeria spp. in a longitudinal study in sediment and water plant samples have not yet been reported. Other studies focus on L. monocytogenes in waste water and sludge [68], fresh surface water and untreated sewage [69], sewage, sewage sludge and river water specimen [70]. These studies report on occasional samplings only. The numbers of Listeria cells reported in such studies, however, are comparable to the population densities determined in this work.

Table 3:

Cell counts of Listeria spp. (MPN/g) in sediments, on water plants and in water of two creeks (Moosach M, Wolnzach W) and one pond (Postweiher P).

3.4 Biodiversity of Listeria at the species level

From all samples tested positive, on average, 20 presumptive Listeria colonies were randomly picked and analyzed. A total of 508 isolates from sediments, 560 isolates from water plants and 152 isolates from water were differentiated to the species level (Supplementary Table 1). The monthly occurrence of all Listeria spp. found in the habitats investigated is shown in Figure 1. With the exception of L. seeligeri, which was predominant at Moosach in the summer months, no clear seasonal trend in population size and species composition was observed. This finding suggests that Listeria populations were rather constant during the 1-year sampling period. Other investigations concerning the seasonal occurrence of Listeria populations in natural environments are inconsistent. While a higher occurrence in fall, winter and spring periods was observed [40], [42], [43], [71], contrary findings with a higher occurrence of Listeria spp. in the summer months have also been reported [37], [72].

The overall species compositions of Listeria populations of water, water plants and sediments are shown in Figure 2. Listeria ivanovii was only rarely found at Wolnzach and at Postweiher, but never at Moosach. Moshtaghi et al. detected L. ivanovii only in soil taken from an animal-inhabited area [33]. In another study, at sites in proximity to cattle grazing, the occurrence of L. monocytogenes was significantly higher [42]. Lyautey et al. [44] reported on a link between the occurrence of L. monocytogenes in surface water, an upstream dairy farm and the presence of cropped adjacent surfaces, while, to the contrary, Sauders et al. found L. monocytogenes and L. innocua to be more common in urban environments [72]. In our study, the creek Moosach was not influenced by cattle farming while adjacent pastures were located at the creek Wolnzach. However, no major difference in the frequency and size of L. monocytogenes populations was found in these two creeks (Figures 1 and 2).

The overall species distribution of Listeria appeared to be similar in sediment and water plants of the two creeks, especially in Moosach (Figures 1 and 2). This was somewhat surprising since R. fluitans and sediment are vastly different habitats with respect to oxygen and nutrient availability, substrates, predators and species interaction [35]. However, it is known that L. monocytogenes and L. innocua harbor an unusually large regulatory gene repertoire in their genomes, including more than 200 transcriptional regulators (ca. 7 % of the genome) and, in addition, 331 genes (ca. 11.6 % of the genome) responsible for carbohydrate transport [12], [73]. This is clear evidence indicating a high ecological flexibility which may enable these species to colonize a broad range of habitats such as water plants and sediments.

3.5 Substantial microbiodiversity of Listeria below the species level

The intraspecific biodiversity (microbiodiversity) of the Listeria species detected in these habitat’s was assessed by RAPD typing of strains isolated from water plants, sediment and water. RAPD is a common typing method characterised by a high discriminatory power [58], [74]. An example of RAPD pattern is shown in the Supplementary Figure 2. All RAPD patterns obtained in our study were found to be species specific (data not shown).

A total of 309 Listeria isolates originating from creek samplings, each comprising the habitats sediment and R. fluitans of the same location probed at the same time were RADP typed. Additionally, 64 isolates from the corresponding water samples were typed (Table 4). The microbiodiversity found is substantial. For instance, among 245 isolates from sediment and R. fluitans, 84 different RAPD types were detected. No evidence was found that the microbiodiversity is different in the three habitats investigated or within the three species isolated in higher numbers (data not shown). However, it is not feasible to calculate biodiversity indices based on the data available for two reasons. First, a limited number of isolates was sampled from each habitat per time point. Second, and more important, the sampling method applied involves an enrichment step. As long as, owing to its low abundance, Listeria clones cannot be detected directly in environmental samples, all conclusions drawn from such data, which refer to population structure, critically depend on the unknown potential of different Listeria clones to survive and compete in a selective enrichment procedure [59], [60], [75], [76].

Table 4:

Total numbers of typed isolates and total numbers of RAPD types detected in the habitat’s sediment, R. fluitans and water.

3.6 Are the Listeria populations in the three habitats sediment, R. fluitans and water related?

A visual analysis of the relative fractions of Listeria spp. on water plants and in corresponding sediments of creek locations and sampling times showed somewhat similar distributions in 11 out of 17 cases, when data from both habitats collected at the same time point were available (marked by an asterisk in Figure 1). This led us to hypothesize that the Listeria populations in both habitats may not be independent. One may speculate that the Listeria cells attached to the surface of the water plants partly originated from the creek sediments and colonized the plant surface from the sediment. To test this hypothesis, RAPD patterns of Listeria originating from the three habitats were compared. Table 5 shows the overall result, summarizing all Listeria species. Between 14 and 16 % of the RAPD types were isolated both from sediment and R. fluitans. However, identical RAPD types were also detected in sediment and water (2 %) as well as on R. fluitans and water (5 %). In addition, on rare occasions, the same RAPD type was found in both Wolnzach and Moosach. The limited fraction of identical RAPD-types obtained from both habitats did not allow the attainment of statistically significant evaluations (exact Fisher test, data not shown). The data available so far are therefore inconclusive as to whether the Listeria populations in sediment and on R. fluitans are related.

Table 5:

Occurrence of RAPD types of L. monocytogenes, L. innocua, and L. seeligeri isolated from sediment, R. fluitans and water of the creeks Moosach and Wolnzach.

4 Conclusion

To our knowledge, this study reports for the first time a monthly longitudinal study of the occurrence of Listeria spp. in three associated aquatic habitats. Also, the occurrence of Listeria spp. on R. fluitans has not been reported before. Creek sediment and water plants were continuously populated by several Listeria species, but, interestingly, no clear species specific habitat preference was found. Additionally, despite low cell counts of Listeria in the habitats investigated, a rather high intraspecific biodiversity was observed.


This study was supported in part by the Vereinigung zur Förderung der milchwissenschaftlichen Forschung an der Technischen Universität München e.V.


  • 1.

    McLauchlin J, Rees CE. Genus Listeria. In: Vos P, Garrity G, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W, Rainey FA, et al., editors. Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, Vol. 3, The Firmicutes. 2009:244–57. Google Scholar

  • 2.

    Graves LM, Helsel LO, Steigerwalt AG, Morey RE, Daneshvar MI, Roof SE, et al. Listeria marthii sp. nov., isolated from the natural environment, Finger Lakes National Forest. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010;60:1280–8. Google Scholar

  • 3.

    Leclercq A, Clermont D, Bizet C, Grimont PA, Le Fleche-Mateos A, Roche SM, et al. Listeria rocourtiae sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010;60:2210–4. Google Scholar

  • 4.

    Bertsch D, Rau J, Eugster MR, Haug MC, Lawson PA, Lacroix C, et al. Listeria fleischmannii sp. nov., isolated from cheese. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013;63:526–32. Google Scholar

  • 5.

    Lang Halter E, Neuhaus K, Scherer S. Listeria weihenstephanensis sp. nov., isolated from the water plant Lemna trisulca taken from a freshwater pond. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013;63:641–7. Google Scholar

  • 6.

    den Bakker HC, Warchocki S, Wright EM, Allred AF, Ahlstrom C, Manuel CS, et al. Listeria floridensis sp. nov., Listeria aquatica sp. nov., Listeria cornellensis sp. nov., Listeria riparia sp. nov. and Listeria grandensis sp. nov., from agricultural and natural environments. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014;64:1882–9. Google Scholar

  • 7.

    Weller D, Andrus A, Wiedmann M, den Bakker HC. Listeria booriae sp. nov. and Listeria newyorkensis sp. nov., from food processing environments in the USA. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015;65: 286–92. Google Scholar

  • 8.

    Painter JS. Listeriosis in humans. Food Sci Technol 2007;161: 85–110. Google Scholar

  • 9.

    Swaminathan B, Gerner-Smidt P. The epidemiology of human listeriosis. Microbes Infect 2007;9:1236–43. Google Scholar

  • 10.

    Farber JM, Peterkin PI. Listeria monocytogenes, a food-borne pathogen. Microbiol Rev 1991;55:476–511. Google Scholar

  • 11.

    Allerberger F, Wagner M. Listeriosis: a resurgent foodborne infection. Clin Microbiol Infect 2010;16:16–23. Google Scholar

  • 12.

    Vivant AL, Garmyn D, Piveteau P. Listeria monocytogenes, a down-to-earth pathogen. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2013;3:87. Google Scholar

  • 13.

    Gandhi M, Chikindas ML. Listeria: a foodborne pathogen that knows how to survive. Int J Food Microbiol 2007;113:1–15. Google Scholar

  • 14.

    Grant MA, Eklund CA, Shields SC. Monitoring dairy silage for five bacterial groups with potential for human pathogenesis. J Food Prot 1995;58:879–83. Google Scholar

  • 15.

    Ryser ET, Arimi SM, Donnelly CW. Effects of pH on distribution of Listeria ribotypes in corn, hay, and grass silage. Appl Environ Microbiol 1997;63:3695–7. Google Scholar

  • 16.

    Nightingale KK, Fortes ED, Ho AJ, Schukken YH, Grohn YT, Wiedmann M. Evaluation of farm management practices as risk factors for clinical listeriosis and fecal shedding of Listeria monocytogenes in ruminants. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005;227:1808–14. Google Scholar

  • 17.

    Borucki MK, Gay CC, Reynolds J, McElwain KL, Kim SH, Call DR, et al. Genetic diversity of Listeria monocytogenes strains from a high-prevalence dairy farm. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005;71:5893–9. Google Scholar

  • 18.

    Ivanek R, Grohn YT, Jui-Jung Ho A, Wiedmann M. Markov chain approach to analyze the dynamics of pathogen fecal shedding–example of Listeria monocytogenes shedding in a herd of dairy cattle. J Theor Biol 2007;245:44–58. Google Scholar

  • 19.

    Nightingale KK, Schukken YH, Nightingale CR, Fortes ED, Ho AJ, Her Z, et al. Ecology and transmission of Listeria monocytogenes infecting ruminants and in the farm environment. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004;70:4458–67. Google Scholar

  • 20.

    Raorane A, Doijad S, Katkar S, Pathak A, Poharkar K, Dubal Z, et al. Prevalence of Listeria spp. in animals and associated environment. Adv Anim Vet Sci 2013;2:81–5. Google Scholar

  • 21.

    Nicholson FA, Groves SJ, Chambers BJ. Pathogen survival during livestock manure storage and following land application. Bioresour Technol 2005;96:135–43. Google Scholar

  • 22.

    Pell AN. Manure and microbes: public and animal health problem? J Dairy Sci 1997;80:2673–81. Google Scholar

  • 23.

    Skovgaard N, Morgen CA. Detection of Listeria spp. in faeces from animals, in feeds, and in raw foods of animal origin. Int J Food Microbiol 1988;6:229–42. Google Scholar

  • 24.

    Weller D, Wiedmann M, Strawn LK. Irrigation is significantly associated with an increased prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes in produce production environments in New York state. J Food Prot 2015;78:1132–41. Google Scholar

  • 25.

    Chambel L, Sol M, Fernandes I, Barbosa M, Zilhao I, Barata B, et al. Occurrence and persistence of Listeria spp. in the environment of ewe and cow’s milk cheese dairies in Portugal unveiled by an integrated analysis of identification, typing and spatial-temporal mapping along production cycle. Int J Food Microbiol 2007;116:52–63. Google Scholar

  • 26.

    Fonnesbech Vogel B, Huss HH, Ojeniyi B, Ahrens P, Gram L. Elucidation of Listeria monocytogenes contamination routes in cold-smoked salmon processing plants detected by DNA-based typing methods. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001;67: 2586–95. Google Scholar

  • 27.

    Gudmundsdottir KB, Aalbaek B, Sigurdarson S, Gunnarsson E. The diversity of Listeria monocytogenes strains from 10 icelandic sheep farms. J Appl Microbiol 2004;96:913–21. Google Scholar

  • 28.

    Guerini MN, Brichta-Harhay DM, Shackelford SD, Arthur TM, Bosilevac JM, Kalchayanand N, et al. Listeria prevalence and Listeria monocytogenes serovar diversity at cull cow and bull processing plants in the United States. J Food Prot 2007;70:2578–82. Google Scholar

  • 29.

    Hansen CH, Vogel BF, Gram L. Prevalence and survival of Listeria monocytogenes in Danish aquatic and fish-processing environments. J Food Prot 2006;69:2113–22. Google Scholar

  • 30.

    Ho AJ, Lappi VR, Wiedmann M. Longitudinal monitoring of Listeria monocytogenes contamination patterns in a farmstead dairy processing facility. J Dairy Sci 2007;90:2517–24. Google Scholar

  • 31.

    Weis J, Seeliger HP. Incidence of Listeria monocytogenes in nature. Appl Microbiol 1975;30:29–32. Google Scholar

  • 32.

    Welshimer HJ, Donker-Voet J. Listeria monocytogenes in nature. Appl Microbiol 1971;21:516–9. Google Scholar

  • 33.

    Moshtaghi H, Garg SR, Mandokhot UV. Prevalence of Listeria in soil. Indian J Exp Biol 2003;41:1466–8. Google Scholar

  • 34.

    Locatelli A, Depret G, Jolivet C, Henry S, Dequiedt S, Piveteau P, et al. Nation-wide study of the occurrence of Listeria monocytogenes in French soils using culture-based and molecular detection methods. J Microbiol Methods 2013;93:242–50. Google Scholar

  • 35.

    Ivanek R, Grohn YT, Wells MT, Lembo AJ, Jr., Sauders BD, Wiedmann M. Modeling of spatially referenced environmental and meteorological factors influencing the probability of Listeria species isolation from natural environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009;75:5893–909. Google Scholar

  • 36.

    Weller D, Wiedmann M, Strawn LK. Spatial and temporal factors associated with an increased prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes in spinach fields in New York state. Appl Environ Microbiol 2015;81:6059–69. Google Scholar

  • 37.

    Chapin TK, Nightingale KK, Worobo RW, Wiedmann M, Strawn LK. Geographical and meteorological factors associated with isolation of Listeria species in New York state produce production and natural environments. J Food Prot 2014;77:1919–28. Google Scholar

  • 38.

    Linke K, Ruckerl I, Brugger K, Karpiskova R, Walland J, Muri-Klinger S, et al. Reservoirs of Listeria species in three environmental ecosystems. Appl Environ Microbiol 2014;80:5583–92. Google Scholar

  • 39.

    Schaffter N, Parriaux A. Pathogenic-bacterial water contamination in mountainous catchments. Water Res 2002;36:131–9. Google Scholar

  • 40.

    Stea EC, Purdue LM, Jamieson RC, Yost CK, Truelstrup Hansen L. Comparison of the prevalences and diversities of Listeria species and Listeria monocytogenes in an urban and a rural agricultural watershed. Appl Environ Microbiol 2015;81:3812–22. Google Scholar

  • 41.

    Gorski L, Walker S, Liang AS, Nguyen KM, Govoni J, Carychao D, et al. Comparison of subtypes of Listeria monocytogenes isolates from naturally contaminated watershed samples with and without a selective secondary enrichment. PLoS One 2014;9:e92467. Google Scholar

  • 42.

    Cooley MB, Quiñones B, Oryang D, Mandrell RE, Gorski L. Prevalence of shiga toxin producing Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, and Listeria monocytogenes at public access watershed sites in a California Central Coast agricultural region. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2014;4:10.3389. Google Scholar

  • 43.

    Strawn LK, Fortes ED, Bihn EA, Nightingale KK, Grohn YT, Worobo RW, et al. Landscape and meteorological factors affecting prevalence of three food-borne pathogens in fruit and vegetable farms. Appl Environ Microbiol 2013;79:588–600. Google Scholar

  • 44.

    Lyautey E, Lapen DR, Wilkes G, McCleary K, Pagotto F, Tyler K, et al. Distribution and characteristics of Listeria monocytogenes isolates from surface waters of the South Nation River watershed, Ontario, Canada. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007;73:5401–10. Google Scholar

  • 45.

    Fenlon DR. Wild birds and silage as reservoirs of Listeria in the agricultural environment. J Appl Bacteriol 1985;59:537–43. Google Scholar

  • 46.

    Monfort P, Minet J, Rocourt J, Piclet G, Cormier M. Incidence of Listeria spp. in Breton live shellfish. Lett Appl Microbiol 1998;26:205–8. Google Scholar

  • 47.

    Quessy S, Messier S. Prevalence of Salmonella spp., Campylobacter spp. and Listeria spp. in ring-billed gulls (Larus delewarensis). J Wildl Dis 1992;28:526–31. Google Scholar

  • 48.

    Bouttefroy A, Lemaitre JP, Rousset A. Prevalence of Listeria sp. in droppings from urban rooks (Corvus frugilegus). J Appl Microbiol 1997;82:641–7. Google Scholar

  • 49.

    Sauders BD, Wiedmann M. Ecology of Listeria species and L. monocytogenes in the natural environment. In: Ryser ET, Marth EH, editors. Listeria, listeriosis and food safety, 3rd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2007:21–54. Google Scholar

  • 50.

    Reissbrodt R. New chromogenic plating media for detection and enumeration of pathogenic Listeria spp. – an overview. Int J Food Microbiol 2004;95:1–9. Google Scholar

  • 51.

    Rebuffo CA, Schmitt J, Wenning M, von Stetten F, Scherer S. Reliable and rapid identification of Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria species by artificial neural network-based Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006;72:994–1000. Google Scholar

  • 52.

    Bubert A, Hein I, Rauch M, Lehner A, Yoon B, Goebel W, et al. Detection and differentiation of Listeria spp. by a single reaction based on multiplex PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999;65: 4688–92. Google Scholar

  • 53.

    Bille J, Catimel B, Bannerman E, Jacquet C, Yersin MN, Caniaux I, et al. API Listeria, a new and promising one-day system to identify Listeria isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol 1992;58:1857–60. Google Scholar

  • 54.

    Wenning M, Theilmann V, Scherer S. Rapid analysis of two food-borne microbial communities at the species level by Fourier-transform infrared microspectroscopy. Environ Microbiol 2006;8:848–57. Google Scholar

  • 55.

    Micheli MR, Bova R, Calissano P, D’Ambrosio E. Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting using combinations of oligonucleotide primers. Biotechniques 1993;15:388–90. Google Scholar

  • 56.

    Welsh J, McClelland M. Genomic fingerprinting using arbitrarily primed PCR and a matrix of pairwise combinations of primers. Nucleic Acids Res 1991;19:5275–9. Google Scholar

  • 57.

    Cocolin L, Stella S, Nappi R, Bozzetta E, Cantoni C, Comi G. Analysis of PCR-based methods for characterization of Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from different sources. Int J Food Microbiol 2005;103:167–78. Google Scholar

  • 58.

    Martinez I, Rørvik LM, Brox V, Lassen J, Seppola M, Gram L, et al. Genetic variability among isolates of Listeria monocytogenes from food products, clinical samples and processing environments, estimated by RAPD typing. Int J Food Microbiol 2003;84:285–97. Google Scholar

  • 59.

    Oravcova K, Trncikova T, Kuchta T, Kaclikova E. Limitation in the detection of Listeria monocytogenes in food in the presence of competing Listeria innocua. J Appl Microbiol 2008;104:429–37. Google Scholar

  • 60.

    Zitz U, Zunabovic M, Domig KJ, Wilrich PT, Kneifel W. Reduced detectability of Listeria monocytogenes in the presence of Listeria innocua. J Food Prot 2011;74:1282–7. Google Scholar

  • 61.

    Sauders BD. Molecular epidemiology, diversity, distribution, and ecology of Listeria. Ph.D. thesis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, 2005. Google Scholar

  • 62.

    Gelbícová T, Karpísková R. Outdoor environment as a source of Listeria monocytogenes in food chain. Czech J Food Sci 2012;30:83–8. Google Scholar

  • 63.

    El-Shenawy MA, El-Shenawy MA. Listeria spp. in the coastal environment of the Aqaba Gulf, Suez Gulf and the Red Sea. Epidemiol Infect 2006;134:752–7. Google Scholar

  • 64.

    Miettinen H, Wirtanen G. Ecology of Listeria spp. in a fish farm and molecular typing of Listeria monocytogenes from fish farming and processing companies. Int J Food Microbiol 2006;112:138–46. Google Scholar

  • 65.

    El Marrakchi A, Boum’handi N, Hamama A. Performance of a new chromogenic plating medium for the isolation of Listeria monocytogenes from marine environments. Lett Appl Microbiol 2005;40:87–91. Google Scholar

  • 66.

    Colburn KG, Kaysner CA, Abeyta C, Jr., Wekell MM. Listeria species in a California coast estuarine environment. Appl Environ Microbiol 1990;56:2007–11. Google Scholar

  • 67.

    Smith JH, Wickham JD, Norton D, Wade TG, Jones KB. Utilization of landscape indicators to model potential pathogen impaired waters. J Am Water Resour Assoc 2001;37:805–14. Google Scholar

  • 68.

    Paillard D, Dubois V, Thiebaut R, Nathier F, Hoogland E, Caumette P, et al. Occurrence of Listeria spp. in effluents of French urban wastewater treatment plants. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005;71:7562–6. Google Scholar

  • 69.

    Bernagozzi M, Bianucci F, Sacchetti R, Bisbini P. Study of the prevalence of Listeria spp. in surface water. Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed 1994;196:237–44. Google Scholar

  • 70.

    Watkins J, Sleath KP. Isolation and enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes from sewage, sewage sludge and river water. J Appl Bacteriol 1981;50:1–9. Google Scholar

  • 71.

    Atil E, Ertas H, Ozbey G. Isolation and molecular characterization of Listeria spp. from animals, food and environmental samples. Vet Med 2011;56:386–94. Google Scholar

  • 72.

    Sauders BD, Overdevest J, Fortes E, Windham K, Schukken Y, Lembo A, et al. Diversity of Listeria species in urban and natural environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012;78:4420–33. Google Scholar

  • 73.

    Glaser P, Frangeul L, Buchrieser C, Rusniok C, Amend A, Baquero F, et al. Comparative genomics of Listeria species. Science 2001;294:849–52. Google Scholar

  • 74.

    Aguado V, Vitas AI, Garcia-Jalon I. Characterization of Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria innocua from a vegetable processing plant by RAPD and REA. Int J Food Microbiol 2004;90:341–7. Google Scholar

  • 75.

    Gorski L, Flaherty D, Mandrell RE. Competitive fitness of Listeria monocytogenes serotype 1/2a and 4b strains in mixed cultures with and without food in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration enrichment protocol. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006;72:776–83. Google Scholar

  • 76.

    Fgaier H, Kalmokoff M, Ells T, Eberl HJ. An allelopathy based model for the Listeria overgrowth phenomenon. Math Biosci 2014;247:13–26. Google Scholar

Supplemental Material:

The online version of this article (DOI: 10.1515/znc-2016-0114) offers supplementary material, available to authorized users.

About the article

Received: 2016-05-30

Revised: 2016-07-28

Accepted: 2016-07-28

Published Online: 2016-09-01

Published in Print: 2016-09-01

Citation Information: Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C, ISSN (Online) 1865-7125, ISSN (Print) 0939-5075, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-2016-0114.

Export Citation

©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Supplementary Article Materials

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in