Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie

International journal of research in physical chemistry and chemical physics

Editor-in-Chief: Rademann, Klaus

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.144
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.144

CiteScore 2017: 1.08

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.495
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.495

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 230, Issue 5-7


Intensive Atomization Energy: Re-Thinking a Metric for Electronic Structure Theory Methods

John P. Perdew
  • Corresponding author
  • Physics Department, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA
  • Chemistry Department, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Jianwei Sun / Alejandro J. Garza / Gustavo E. Scuseria
  • Department of Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, TX 77251, USA
  • Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rice University, Houston, TX 77251, USA
  • Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2016-01-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zpch-2015-0713


The errors in atomization energies (AE) of molecules have long been used to measure the errors of wavefunction or density functional methods for electronic structure calculations. In particular, the G3 set of Pople and collaborators (for sp-bonded molecules from the first rows of the periodic table) has become a standard benchmark for such methods. But the mean absolute error of AE tends to increase with increasing number Nat of atoms in a molecule. In fact, AE is an extensive variable, which diverges as Nat →∞. Here, as did Savin and Johnson 2015, we define an intensive atomization energy, IAE = AE/Nat or atomization energy per atom, which tends to the finite cohesive energy (per atom) of a large cluster or solid (Nat →∞). We find that the mean absolute error of the G3 molecular IAE from accurate density functionals remains close to 1 kcal/mol as the average molecular size increases. This makes it possible to estimate in advance the magnitude of the error in AE for a molecule similar to most of those in the G3 set. It also allows us identify the G3 “outlying molecules”, and to more directly compare the accuracy of a given functional for different kinds of molecules (such as those containing transition-metal atoms) to that for G3-type molecules, by removing the otherwise-uncontrolled size factor. Finally, we point out that the familiar concept of “chemical accuracy” needs to be qualified.

Keywords: DFT; Atomization Energies; Intensive Variables; Extensive Variables; Standard Benchmark; Chemical Accuracy

About the article

Accepted: 2015-12-14

Received: 2015-10-15

Published Online: 2016-01-12

Published in Print: 2016-05-28

Citation Information: Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie, Volume 230, Issue 5-7, Pages 737–742, ISSN (Online) 2196-7156, ISSN (Print) 0942-9352, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zpch-2015-0713.

Export Citation

©2016 Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Alejandro J. Garza, Alexis T. Bell, and Martin Head-Gordon
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 2018
Pascal Pernot and Andreas Savin
The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2018, Volume 148, Number 24, Page 241707
Johannes T. Margraf, Duminda S. Ranasinghe, and Rodney J. Bartlett
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017, Volume 19, Number 15, Page 9798
Bartolomeo Civalleri, Roberto Dovesi, Pascal Pernot, Davide Presti, and Andreas Savin
Computation, 2016, Volume 4, Number 2, Page 20

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in