Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Germanistische Abteilung

Ed. by Haferkamp, Hans-Peter / Oestmann, Peter / Rückert, Joachim

Online
ISSN
2304-4861
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 136, Issue 1

Issues

Volume 82 (1965)

Volume 79 (1962)

Boosfeld, Kristin, Die beiden Statutenlehren Geschichte eines rechtshistorischen Missverständnisses

Kristin Boosfeld
Published Online: 2019-07-17 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgg-2019-0003

Abstract

The two theories of statuta, History of a misunderstanding. Most German legal historians have heard of a late medieval theory of statuta. However, different views exist as to the content of this theory. Some view it as a theory providing rules on which of several conflicting local laws to apply. Others, in contrast, understand it as a theory on the relation of local laws with the (Roman) common law. The roots of this ambivalence go back to the work of the controversial legal historian Franz Wieacker who used the terminology of theory of statuta for a different phenomenon than his colleagues all over Europe at the time.

Keywords: Conflict of laws; Bartolus de Saxoferrato; theory of statuta; Franz Wieacker

About the article

Published Online: 2019-07-17

Published in Print: 2019-06-26


Citation Information: Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Germanistische Abteilung, Volume 136, Issue 1, Pages 76–93, ISSN (Online) 2304-4861, ISSN (Print) 0323-4045, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgg-2019-0003.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in