Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Savigny Verlagsgesellschaft

Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Germanistische Abteilung

Ed. by Oestmann, Peter / Rückert, Joachim / Haferkamp, Hans-Peter

1 Issue per year

Online
ISSN
2304-4861
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 133, Issue 1

Issues

V. Streit um Anwaltskosten in der frühen Neuzeit

Peter Oestmann
Published Online: 2016-10-31 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7767/zrgga-2016-0107

Abstract

Argument about legal fees in the early modern period. Part 2: jurisdiction and types of procedure. Part II of this investigation, following ZRG GA 132 (2015), pp. 152-218, describes the practice of the courts. What were the possibilities for procurators to sue for their fees if the parties did not pay them? Most aspects of procedural law were quite unknown until now: The Rescripts of the Aulic Council and the Mandata de solvendo of the Wismar Tribunal were complete different ways for the procurators to get their fees. Not surprisingly, the Wismar procedures seem the more powerful and effective ones, enabling the administrative and jurisdictional organization of the Swedish territory to sue in a promising way. On the other hand, the procedures at the Imperial courts show, up to the end of the Old Empire in the summer of 1806, the typical weakness, even if some effective bureaucracy can be observed.

Keywords: procurator; procedural law; rescripts; mandata de solvendo; Imperial Chamber Court; Imperial Aulic Council; Wismar Tribunal

About the article

Published Online: 2016-10-31

Published in Print: 2016-10-01


Citation Information: Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Germanistische Abteilung, Volume 133, Issue 1, Pages 191–295, ISSN (Online) 2304-4861, ISSN (Print) 0323-4045, DOI: https://doi.org/10.7767/zrgga-2016-0107.

Export Citation

© 2016 by Böhlau Verlag GmbH & Co.KG.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in