Permeable Boundaries: Daniel Defoe’s A Journal of the Plague Year (1722) and Jurij M. Lotman’s Semiosphere

  • 1 Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
Nicole Falkenhayner


This article argues that the cultural semiotic model of the “semiosphere” by Lotman (Lotman, Grishakova and Clark 2009) can be productively employed to interpret the complex layers of social order and liminal sociality in Daniel Defoe’s A Journal of the Plague Year (1722). Defoe’s text, analysed with a cultural semiotic approach, appears as more than a shocking re-narration of a historical event, as it becomes possible to read this proto-novel as a text that showcases and makes experiential the entanglement of social breakdown and social needs. London during the plague is shown as a space that labours to enforce both discursive as well as physical borders, but fails in both instances: The lively media public which Defoe depicts for the mid-17th century is shown as failing to establish boundaries of ‘facts’ and ‘fake news’, while single human beings constantly defy the shutting orders of the authorities, or flee the city illegally. In the semiosphere of a London constituted by a state of exception, Defoe strategically inserts permeable boundaries to show a survival of conviviality in the face of the breakdown of society. The main topoi of Lotman’s cultural semiotic model – explosion and periphery – illustrate both the discursive disorientation during the plague as well as the spatial peripheries of the city as sites of liminal social survival in the face of catastrophe.

  • Agamben, Giorgio and Daniel Heller-Roazen. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

  • Alker, Sharon and Holly F. Nelson. 2015. “(Re)Writing Spaces of War: Daniel Defoe and Early Modern Siege Narratives”. In: Katherine Ellison, Kit Kincaid and Holly F. Nelson (eds.). Topographies of the Imagination: New Approaches to Daniel Defoe. New York: AMS Press. 209–234.

  • Berensmeyer, Ingo. 2007. Angles of Contingency: Literarische Kultur im England des 17. Jahrhunderts. Berlin: de Gruyter.

  • Defoe, Daniel. 1722/2010. A Journal of the Plague Year. Eds. Louis Landa and David Roberts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • DeGabriele, Peter. 2015. Sovereign Power and the Enlightenment: Eighteenth-Century Literature and the Problem of the Political. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.

  • Esposito, Elena. 2007. Die Fiktion der wahrscheinlichen Realität. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

  • Evelyn, John and Samuel Pepys. 1973. Selections from the Diaries of John Evelyn and Samuel Pepys. Ed. James Gibson. London: Chatto & Windus Education.

  • Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

  • Frank, Susi K., Cornelia Ruhe and Alexander Schmitz (eds.). 2012. Explosion und Peripherie: Jurij Lotmans Semiotik der kulturellen Dynamik revisited. Bielefeld: transcript.

  • Hodges, Nathaniel and John Quincy. 1720. Loimologia. 2nd ed. London: Bell.

  • Korte, Barbara. 2016. “Early-Modern Diversity: The Origins of the English Short Fiction”. In: Dominic Head (ed.). The Cambridge History of the English Short Story. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 16–31.

  • Lachmann, Renate. 2012. “Jurij Lotman: Die vorexplosive Phase”. In: Susi K. Frank, Cornelia Ruhe and Alexander Schmitz (eds.). Explosion und Peripherie: Jurij Lotmans Semiotik der kulturellen Dynamik revisited. Bielefeld: transcript. 97–118.

  • Lotman, Jurij M. 2009. Culture and Explosion. Eds. Marina Grischakova and Wilma Clark. Berlin: de Gruyter.

  • Mayer, Robert. 1990. “The Reception of a Journal of the Plague Year and the Nexus of Fiction and History in the Novel”. ELH 57.3: 529–555.

  • McDowell, Paula. 2006. “Defoe and the Contagion of the Oral: Modelling Media Shift in ‘A Journal of the Plague Year’”. PMLA 121.1: 87–106.

  • McKinley, Alan. 2009. “Foucault, Plague, Defoe”. Culture and Organization 15.2: 167–184.

  • Moote, A. Lloyd and Dorothy C. Moote. 2004. The Great Plague: The Story of London’s Most Deadly Year . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Novak, Maximilian E. 2001. Daniel Defoe: Master of Fictions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Payne, Geoffrey. 2014. “Distemper, Scourge, Invader: Discourse and Plague in Defoe’s A Journal of the Plague Year”. English Studies 95.6: 620–636.

  • Richetti, John. 2008. “Defoe as Narrative Innovator”. In: John Richetti (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Daniel Defoe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 121–138.

  • Vincent, Thomas. 1667. Gods Terrible Voice in the City of London. EEBO Early English books online, Chadwyck-Healy (ProQuest) <> [accessed 27 April 2018].

  • Williams, Raymond. 1977. Marxism and Literature. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.

Log in with your institution

Journal + Issues

A renowned journal of English philology, Anglia was founded in 1878 by Moritz Trautmann and Richard P. Wülker. It is thus the oldest journal of English Studies in existence. Anglia publishes essays on the English language and linguistic history, on English literature of the Middle Ages and the modern period, on American literature, on new literatures in English, as well as on general and comparative literary studies.