Accounting for changing returns to experience

Lutz Hendricks 1
  • 1 University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
Lutz Hendricks

Abstract

Returns to experience for U.S. workers have changed over the post-war period. This paper argues that a simple model goes a long way towards replicating these changes. The model features three well-known ingredients: (i) an aggregate production function with constant skill-biased technical change; (ii) cohort qualities that vary with average years of schooling; and crucially (iii) time-invariant age-efficiency profiles. The model quantitatively accounts for changes in longitudinal and cross-sectional returns to experience, as well as the differential evolution of the college wage premium for young and old workers.

  • Autor, D. H., L. F. Katz, and M. S. Kearney. 2008. “Trends in U.S. Wage Inequality: Revising the Revisionists.” Review of Economics and Statistics 90: 300–323.

  • Ben-Porath, Y 1967. “The Production of Human Capital and the Life Cycle of Earnings.” Journal of Political Economy 75: 352–365.

  • Bowlus, A. J., and C. Robinson. 2012. “Human Capital Prices, Productivity, and Growth.” The American Economic Review 102: 3483–3515.

  • Card, D., and T. Lemieux. 2001. “Can Falling Supply Explain the Rising Return to College for Younger Men? A Cohort-Based Analysis.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116: 705–746.

  • Guvenen, F., and B. Kuruscu. 2010. “A Quantitative Analysis of the Evolution of the US Wage Distribution: 1970–2000.” NBER Macroeconomics Annual 24: 227–276.

  • Hendricks, L 2015. Constructing Age-Earnings Profiles from CPS Data. University of North Carolina: Mimeo.

  • Hendricks, L., and T. Schoellman. 2014. “Student Abilities During the Expansion of U.S. Education.” Journal of Monetary Economics 63: 19–36.

  • Jeong, H., Y. Kim, and I. Manovskii. 2015. “The Price of Experience.” The American Economic Review 105: 784–815.

  • Juhn, C., and S. Potter. 2006. “Changes in Labor Force Participation in the United States.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 20: 27–46.

  • Kambourov, G., and I. Manovskii. 2009. Accounting for the Changing Life-Cycle Profile of Earnings. Mimeo: University of Pennsylvania.

  • Katz, L. F., and K. M. Murphy. 1992. “Changes in Relative Wages, 1963–1987: Supply and Demand Factors.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 107: 35–78.

  • King, M., S. Ruggles, J. T. Alexander, S. Flood, K. Genadek, M. B. Schroeder, B. Trampe, and R. Vick. 2010. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, Current Population Survey: Version 3.0. [Machine-readable database]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

  • Kong, Y.-C., B. Ravikumar, and G. Vandenbroucke. 2015. “Explaining Cross-Cohort Differences in Life Cycle Earnings.”.Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper Series.

  • Murphy, K., and F. Welch. 1990. “Empirical Age-Earnings Profiles.” Journal of Labor Economics 8: 202–229.

  • Rupert, P., and G. Zanella. 2015. “Revisiting Wage, Earnings, and Hours Profiles.” Journal of Monetary Economics 72: 114–130.

  • Schulhofer-Wohl, S., and Y. Yang. 2011. “Modeling the Evolution of Age and Cohort Effects in Social Research.”.Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Staff Report 461.

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
$42.00
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


Journal + Issues

The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics publishes significant research and scholarship in theoretical and applied macroeconomics. The range of topics includes business cycle research, economic growth, and monetary economics, as well as topics drawn from the substantial areas of overlap between macroeconomics and international economics, labor economics, finance, development economics, political economy, public economics, econometric theory.

Search