Periurbanization and conservation pressures over remnants of native vegetation: impact on ecosystem services for a Latin-American capital city


Urban expansion in Latin-American cities is faster than urban planning. In order to implement sustainable planning the capacity of peri-urban areas to provide ecosystem services must be evaluated in the context of competing urbanization and conservation pressures. In this study we analyzed the effect of urban expansion on peri-urban vegetation of the Metropolitan Area of Santiago and what ecosystem services are provided by El Panul, land rich in biodiversity embedded in the fringe of the city. The city has lost vegetation while urbanized areas grow. Under this context, we evaluated the multi-functionality of El Panul through the quantification of three ecosystem services (ES): sense of place through the interviews of 60 residents, recreation via GIS analyses, and local climate regulation determined with air temperature measurements. El Panul increased the provision of urban green spaces, where inhabitants recognize and appreciate ES, and it plays a significant role in mitigating the urban heat island on summer nights. ES have emerged as a concept and framework for evaluating competing urban development alternatives.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Jacquin, A., Misakova, L., Gaya, M.A. Hybrid object-based classification approach for mapping urban sprawl in periurban environment. Landsc Urban Plan, 2008, 84, 152–165.

  • [2] Allen, A.. Environmental planning and management of the peri-urban interface: perspectives on an emerging field. Environ Urban, 2003, 15(1), 135-148.

  • [3] Cavailhes, J., Peeters, D., Sekeris, E. Thisse, J.F. The periurban city. Why to live between the city and the countryside. Reg Sci Urban Econ, 2004, 34 (6), 681–703.

  • [4] Salazar, A. Transformaciones socio-territoriales en la periferia metropolitana: la ciudad periurbana, estrategias locales y gobernanza en Santiago de Chile. Scripta Nova. Revista Electrónica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales, 2010, 331 (47) Retrieved from -

  • [5] CBO. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Cities and Biodiversity Outlook. Montreal, 2012.

  • [6] Merlín-Uribe, Y., Contreras-Hernández, A., Astier-Calderón, M. Jensen, O. P. Zaragoza, R., Zambrano, L. Urban expansion into a protected natural area in Mexico City: alternative management scenarios. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2013, 56:3, 398-41.

  • [7] Radford, K. G., James, P. Changes in the value of ecosystem services along a rural–urban gradient: A case study of Greater Manchester, UK. Landsc Urban Plan, 2013, 109(1), 117-127.

  • [8] Ravetz, J., Fertner, C. Sick Nielsen, T.A. The Dynamics of Peri-Urbanization. In: Nilsson, K., S. Pauleit, S. Bell, C. Aalbers & T.A. Sick Nielsen (eds.) Peri-urban futures: Scenarios and models for land use change in Europe (pp. 13-45). Springer- Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013.

  • [9] Inostroza, L., Baur, R., Csaplovics, E. Urban sprawl and fragmentation in Latin America: A dynamic quantification and characterization of spatial patterns. Journal of Environmental Management, 2013, 115, 87-97.

  • [10] Sperandelli, D. I., Dupas, F. A., Dias Pons, N. A. Dynamics of urban sprawl, vacant land, and green spaces on the metropolitan fringe of São Paulo, Brazil. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 2013, 139(4), 274-279.

  • [11] Janoschka, M. El nuevo modelo de la ciudad latinoamericana: fragmentación y privatización. EURE, 2002, 28(85), 11-20.

  • [12] Borsdorf, A. Cómo modelar el desarrollo y la dinámica de la ciudad latinoamericana. EURE, 2003, 29 (86), 37-49.

  • [13] Borsdorf, A., Hidalgo, R., Sánchez, R. A new model of urban development in Latin America: The gated communities and fenced cities in the metropolitan areas of Santiago de Chile and Valparaíso. Cities, 2007, 24 (5), 365-378.

  • [14] Romero-Lankao, P., Qin, H., Borbor-Cordova, M. Exploration of health risks related to air pollution and temperature in three Latin American cities. Social Science & Medicine, 2013, 83, 110-118.

  • [15] Sarricolea, P., Martín-Vide, J. El estudio de la Isla de Calor Urbana de Superficie del Área Metropolitana de Santiago de Chile con imágenes Terra-MODIS y Análisis de Componentes Principales. Revista de geografía Norte Grande, 2014, 57, 123-141.

  • [16] Ward, P. M. “A Patrimony for the Children”: Low-Income Homeownership and Housing (Im) Mobility in Latin American Cities. Ann Assoc Am Geogr, 2012, 102(6), 1489-1510.

  • [17] UNEP–United Nations Environment Programme. Latin America and the Caribbean: Environment Outlook, GEO LAC 3, 2010.

  • [18] De la Barrera, F., Moreira, D. Recognizing how ecosystem services of Mahuida Park (Santiago de Chile) benefit citizen: a strategy to link the protection of natural areas to urban settings. Treballs de la Societat Catalana de Geografia, 2013, 75, 243-253.

  • [19] La Rosa, D., Takatori, C., Shimizu, H., Privitera, R. A planning framework to evaluate demands and preferences by different social groups for accessibility to urban greenspaces. Sustain Cities Soc, 2018, 36, 346-362.

  • [20] Kabisch, N., Strohbach, M., Haase, D., Kronenberg, J. Urban green space availability in European cities. Ecol Indic, 2016, 70, 586-596.

  • [21] Huang, S. L., Chen, Y. H., Kuo, F. Y., Wang, S. H. Emergy-based evaluation of peri-urban ecosystem services. Ecological Complexity, 2011, 8(1), 38-50.

  • [22] McKinney, M. L. Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst, 2008, 11(2), 161-176.

  • [23] Keeley, M. Using individual parcel asessment to improve stormwater management. J Am Plann Assoc, 2007, 73(2), 149-160.

  • [24] Opdam, P., Steingrover, E., Rooji, S. Ecological networks: a spatial concept for multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan, 2006, 75(3-4), 322-332.

  • [25] Potschin, M., Haines-Young, R. Defining and measuring ecosystem services. In: Potschin, M., Haines-Young, R., Fish, R. and Turner, R.K. (eds) Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services. Routledge, London and New York, pp. 25-44, 2016. Available from:

  • [26] Colding, J. The role of ecosystem services in contemporary urban planning. In J. Niemelä, (Ed.), Urban Ecology - Patterns, processes and applications (pp. 228-237). New York – Oxford, 2012

  • [27] Troy, A., Wilson, M. A. Mapping ecosystem services: Practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer. Ecol Econ, 2006, 60(2), 435–449.

  • [28] De Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., Willemen, L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 2010, 7(3), 260–272.

  • [29] Ahern, J., Cilliers, S., Niemelä, J. The concept of ecosystem service in adaptive urban planning and design: A framework for supporting innovation. Landsc Urban Plan, 2014, 125, 254-259

  • [30] Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas (INE) Síntesis resultados Censo 2017. Retrieved November 1, 2018 from -, 2018.

  • [31] Romero, H., Vásquez, A. Environmental evaluation of Andean piedmont urbanization process in Santiago de Chile. EURE, 2005, 31(94), 97-117.

  • [32] Pavez, E., Lobos, G., Jaksic, F. Cambios de largo plazo en el paisaje y los ensambles de micromamíferos y rapaces en Chile. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 2010, 83, 99-111.

  • [33] Madaleno, I. M., Gurovich, A. “Urban versus rural” no longer matches reality: An early public agro-residential development in periurban Santiago, Chile. Cities, 2014, 21(6), 513–526.

  • [34] Borsdorf, A., Hildalgo, R., Vidal-Koppmann, S. Social segregation and gated communities in Santiago de Chile and Buenos Aires. A comparison. Habitat Int, 2016, 54, 18-27, doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.11.033

  • [35] OECD Urban Policy Reviews, Chile 2013, OECD Publishing., 2013.

  • [36] Cooper, M., Henríquez, C. Planificación Territorial y Crecimiento Urbano: Desarticulaciones y Desafíos de la Sostenibilidad Urbano-Regional en Santiago Metropolitano. Scripta Nova, Revista Electrónica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales, 2010, 331 (14). Retrieved from -

  • [37] Banzhaf, E., Reyes-Paecke, S., Müller, A., Kindler, A. Do demographic and land-use changes contrast urban and suburban dynamics? A sophisticated reflection on Santiago de Chile. Habitat Int, 2013, 39, 179–191.

  • [38] Peña, M. A. Relationships between remotely sensed surface parameters associated with the urban heat sink formation in Santiago, Chile. Int J Remote Sens, 2008, 29(15), 4385-4404.

  • [39] De la Barrera, F., Henriquez, C. Vegetation cover change in growing urban agglomerations in Chile. Ecol Indic, 2017, 81, 265-73.

  • [40] Stefanov, W. L., Netzband, M. Assessment of ASTER land cover and MODIS NDVI data at multiple scales for ecological characterization of an arid urban center. Remote Sens Environ, 2005, 99(1), 31-43.

  • [41] Verbesselt, J., Hyndman, R., Newnham, G., Culvenor, D. Detecting trend and seasonal changes in satellite image time series. Remote Sens Environ, 2010, 114(1), 106-115.

  • [42] Potter, C. S., Brooks, V. Global analysis of empirical relations between annual climate and seasonality of NDVI. Int J Remote Sens, 1998, 19(15), 2921-2948.

  • [43] Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Venn, S., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Kaźmierczak, A., Niemela, J., et al. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review. Landsc Urban Plan, 2007, 81(3), 167-178.

  • [44] Soini, K., Vaarala, H., Pouta, E. Residents’ sense of place and landscape perceptions at the rural–urban interface. Landsc Urban Plan, 2012, 104(1), 124-134.

  • [45] Handley, J., Pauleit, S., Slinn, P., Barber, A., Baker, M., Jones, C., Lindley, S. Accessible natural green space standards in towns and cities: a review and toolkit. English Nature research report number 526. English Nature, Peterborough, 2003.

  • [46] ADIMARK. Mapa socioeconómico de Chile. Nivel socioeconómico de los hogares del país basado en datos del Censo 2002. [online] URL: 2004

  • [47] López, E., Bocco, G., Mendoza, M., Duhau, E. Predicting land-cover and land-use change in the urban fringe: a case in Morelia city, Mexico. Landsc Urban Plan, 2001, 55(4), 271-285.

  • [48] Henríquez, C., Azócar, G., Romero, H. Monitoring and modeling the urban growth of two mid-sized Chilean cities. Habitat Int, 2006, 30(4), 945-964.

  • [49] Rojas, C., Muñiz, I., Pino, J. Understanding the urban sprawl in the mid-size Latin American cities through the urban form: Analysis of the Concepción metropolitan area (Chile). Journal of Geographic Information System, 2013, 5 (3), 222-234.

  • [50] Schulz, J.J., Cayuela, L., Echeverria, C., Salas, J., Rey Benayas, J.M. Monitoring land cover change of the dryland forest landscape of central Chile (1975-2008). Appl Geogr, 2010, 30, 436-447.

  • [51] De la Barrera, F., Rubio, P., Banzhaf, E. The value of vegetation cover for ecosystem services in the suburban context. Urban For Urban Green, 2016, 16, 110-122.

  • [52] Lissner, T. K., Reusser, D. E., Lakes, T., Kropp, J. P. A systematic approach to assess human wellbeing demonstrated for impacts of climate change. Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems, 2014, 1(1), 98-110.

  • [53] La Rosa, D. Accessibility to greenspaces: GIS based indicators for sustainable planning in a dense urban context. Ecol Indic, 2014, 42, 122-134.

  • [54] Schipperijn, J., Stigsdotter, U. K., Randrup, T. B., Troelsen, J. Influences on the use of green space - A case study in Odense, Denmark. Urban For Urban Green, 2010, 9(1), 25-32.

  • [55] Taylor B., Fernando P., Bauman A., Williamson A., Craig J., Redman S. Measuring the quality of public open space using Google Earth. Am J Prev Med, 2011, 40 (2) 105-112

  • [56] Zhou, X., Kim, J. Social disparities in tree canopy and park accessibility: A case study of six cities in Illinois using GIS and remote sensing. Urban For Urban Green, 2013, 12(1), 88-97.

  • [57] Yao, L., Liu, J., Wang, R., Yin, K., Han, B. Effective green equivalent—A measure of public green spaces for cities. Ecol Indic, 2014, 47(0), 123-127.

  • [58] La Rosa, D., Spyra, M., Inostroza, L. Indicators of Cultural Ecosystem Services for urban planning: A review. Ecol Indic, 2016, 61, 74-89.

  • [59] Reis, S., Seto, E., Northcross, A., Quinn, N. W., Convertino, M., Jones, R. L., et al. Integrating modelling and smart sensors for environmental and human health. Environ Model Softw, 2015, 74, 238-246.

  • [60] Bagstad, K. J., Johnson, G. W., Voigt, B., Villa, F. Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: a comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services. Ecosyst Serv, 2013, 4, 117-125.

  • [61] Serna-Chavez, H. M., Schulp, C. J. E., Van Bodegom, P. M., Bouten, W., Verburg, P. H., Davidson, M. D. A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of ecosystem services. Ecol Indic, 2014, 39, 24-33.

  • [62] Opdam, P., Coninx, I., Dewulf, A., Steingröver, E., Vos, C., Van der Wal, M. Framing ecosystem services: Affecting behaviour of actors in collaborative landscape planning?. Land Use Policy, 2015, 46, 223-231.

  • [63] Sagaris, L. Citizen participation for sustainable transport: the case of “Living City” in Santiago, Chile (1997–2012). J Transp Geogr, 2014, 41, 74-83.

  • [64] Opdam, P., Albert, C., Fürst, C., Grêt-Regamey, A., Kleemann, J., Parker, D., et al. Ecosystem services for connecting actors–lessons from a symposium. Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems, 2015, 2(1), 1-7.


Journal + Issues

CASES is focused on highly inter and trans disciplinary research and addresses case studies, methodologies, statements and experiences that tell lessons learnt from how complex land systems evolve, react, should be developed or can be researched. The journal welcomes full research papers, discussions, reviews and short notes that advance land system science, both success and non-success stories.