How politicians express different viewpoints in gesture and speech simultaneously

  • 1 Annenberg School for Communication, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
Douglas Guilbeault
  • Corresponding author
  • Annenberg School for Communication, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
  • Email
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar

Abstract

Political speeches are a prime example of how discourse often requires speakers to convey multiple competing viewpoints, both their own and others’. Cognitive linguists have shown how, in speech, speakers express viewpoint through individual choices at the lexical and grammatical level. Recently, cognitive linguists have also shown that speakers express viewpoint using speech-accompanying gestures. To date, the study of viewpoint expression has focused on cases where speakers deliver the same viewpoint across modalities. By examining the persuasive uses of gesture in Obama’s A More Perfect Union speech, I show how speakers can communicate multiple different viewpoints across gesture and speech, simultaneously. There are moments when Obama expresses his opponents’ viewpoint in speech, while framing them in terms of his own viewpoint in gesture, and vice versa. I discuss how the deviation of viewpoints across modalities provides key insights into multimodal cognition, with respect to working memory, metaphor, and persuasion. Specifically, I argue that, as an implicit medium, gesture allows speakers to inject viewpoint into the uptake of speech, below the conscious radar of recipients, and I discuss how this rhetorical capacity is evolving as a result of communication technologies.

  • Atkinson, M. 1984. Our masters’ voices: The language and body language of politics. London: Routledge.

  • Atkinson, M. 2005. Lend me your ears: All you need to know about making speeches and presentations. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Bailenson, J. N., A. C. Beall & J. Loomis. 2005. Transformed social interaction, augmented gaze, and social influence in immersive virtual environments. Human Communication Research 31(4). 511–537.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Translated by Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist. Austin & London: University of Texas Press.

  • Barr, Dale & Boaz Keysar. 2007. Perspective taking and the coordination of meaning in language use. In M. J. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 2nd edn., 901–938. New York: Academic Press.

  • Bates, Elizabeth. 1979. The emergence of symbols. New York: Academic Press.

  • Bergen, Ben. 2012. Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.

  • Broaders, Sara & Susan Goldin-Meadow. 2010. Truth is at hand: How gesture adds information during investigative interviews. Psychological Science 21. 623–628.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Brookshire, Geoffrey & Daniel Casasanto. 2012. Motivation and motor control: Hemispheric specialization for approach motivation reverses with handedness. PLoS ONE 7(4). (accessed February 8, 2014).

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Bullowa, M. (ed.). 1979. Before speech: The beginning of interpersonal communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Bulwer, J. 1644. Chirologia, or the natural language of the hand. London: Thomas Harper.

  • Calbris, Geneviève. 2008. From left to right… Coverbal gestures and their symbolic use of space. In Cornelia Müller & Alan Cienki (eds.), Metaphor and gesture (Gesture Studies 3), 27–55. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Cappella, J. N. & S. Planalp. 1981. Talk and silence sequences in informal conversations III: Interspeaker influence. Human Communication Research 7. 117–132.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Casasanto, Daniel. 2008. Similarity and proximity: When does close in space mean close in mind? Memory & Cognition 36(6). 1047–1056.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Casasanto, Daniel. 2009. The embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in left and right handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 138(3). 351–367.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Casasanto, Daniel & Kyle Jasmin. 2010. Good and bad in the hands of politicians: Spontaneous gestures during positive and negative speech. PLoS ONE 5(7). e11805. doi:.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Caso, Letizia, Fridanna Maricchiolo & Marino Bonaiuto. 2006. The impact of deception and suspicion on different hand movements. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour 30(1). 1–19.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2014. Analyzing political speeches: Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.

  • Chatterjee, Anjan. 2010. Disembodying cognition. Language and Cognition 2(1). 79–116.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Chemero, Anthony. 2009. Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Cook, Susan Wagner, Zachary Mitchell & Susan Goldin-Meadow. 2008. Gesturing makes learning last. Cognition 106. 1047–1058.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Cook, Susan Wagner, Terina Kuang Yi Yip & Susan Goldin-Meadow. 2012. Gestures, but not meaningless movements, lighten working memory load when explaining math. Language and Cognitive Processes 27(4). 594–610.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Cooperrider, Kensy. 2014. Body-directed gestures: Pointing to the self and beyond. Journal of Pragmatics 71. 1–16. doihttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.003

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Cornejo, Carlos, Franco Simonetti, Augstin Ibanez, Nerea Aldunate, Francisco Ceric, Vladimir Lopez & Rafael Nunez. 2009. Gesture and metaphor comprehension: Electrophysiological evidence of cross-modal coordination by audiovisual stimulation. Brain and Cognition 70. 42–52.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Dael, Nele, Martijn Goudbeek & K. R. Scherer. 2013. Perceived gesture dynamics in nonverbal expression of emotion. Perception 42(6). 642–657.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Dancygier, Barbara. 2008. Personal pronouns, blending, and narrative viewpoint. In A. Tyler, K. Yiyoung & M. Takada (eds.), Language in the context of use: Discourse and cognitive approaches to language, 167–182. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

  • Dancygier, Barbara. 2012. The language of stories. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Dancygier, Barbara, José Sanders & Lieven Vandelanotte (eds.). 2012. Textual choices in discourse: A view from cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Dancygier, Barbara & Eve Sweetser (eds.). 2012. Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Dancygier, Barbara & Eve Sweetser. 2014. Figurative language (Cambridge textbooks in linguistics). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Dancygier, Barbara & Lieven Vandelanotte. 2016. Discourse viewpoint as network. In Barbara Dancygier, Lu Wei-Lun & Arie Verhagen (eds.), Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities, 13–41. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

  • Dancygier, Barbara, Lu Wei-Lun & Arie Verhagen (eds.). 2016. Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

  • David-Barrett, T. & R. I. M. Dunbar. 2013. Processing power limits social group size: Computational evidence for the cognitive costs of sociality. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 280(1765). http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/280/1765/20131151

  • Davidse, Kristin & Lieven Vandelanotte. 2011. Tense use in direct and indirect speech in English. Journal of Pragmatics 43(1). 236–250.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Detz, Joan. 2002. How to write & give a speech: A practical guide for executives, PR people, the military, fund-raisers, politicians, educators, and anyone who has to make every word count. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin.

  • Dittrich, W. H., T. Troscianko, S. E. G. Lee & Dawn Morgan. 1996. Perception of emotion from dynamic point light displays represented in dance. Perception 25. 727–738.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Fabien, Mathy. 2012. What’s magic about magic numbers? Chunking and data compression in short-term memory. Cognition 122(3). 346–362.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Fauconnier, Gilles. 2003. Polarity and the scale principle. In Javier Gutierrez-Rexach (ed.), Semantics: Critical concepts in linguistics. London: Routledge.

  • Fillmore, Charles. 1982. Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company.

  • Fischer, Martin & Rolf A. Zwaan. 2008. Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61. 825–850.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Fox, R. & C. McDaniel. 1982. The perception of biological motion by human infants. Science 218. 486–487.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Franklin, Amy. 2007. Blending in deception: Tracing output back to its source. In Susan D. Duncan, Justine Cassell & Elena T. Levy (eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimension of language (Gesture Studies 1), 99–108. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Fukada, Chie. 2016. The dynamic interplay between words and pictures in picture storybooks: How visual and verbal information interact and affect the readers’ viewpoint and understanding. In Barbara Dancygier, Wei-lun Lu & Arie Verhagen (eds.), Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities, 217–236. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

  • Gallagher, S. 2005. How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Gerofsky, Susan. 2010. Mathematical learning and gesture: Character viewpoint and observer viewpoint in students’ gestured graphs of functions. Gesture 10(2/3). 321–343.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Goldin-Meadow, Susan, San Kim & Melissa Singer. 1999. What the teacher’s hands tell the student’s mind about math. Journal of Educational Psychology 91. 720–730.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Goldin-Meadow, Susan & Susan M. Wagner. 2005. How our hands help us learn. Trends in Cognitive Science 9. 234–241.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Goodrich Smith, Whitney & Carla L. Hudson Kam. 2015. Children’s use of gesture in ambiguous pronoun interpretation. Journal of Child Language 42(3). 591–617. doi:http://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000915000045

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Goodrich, Whitney & Carla L. Hudson Kam. 2009. Co-speech gesture as input in verb learning. Development Science 12. 81–87.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Gottfried, J. & E. Shearer. 2016. News across social media platforms 2016. http://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2016/

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Gumperz, John (ed.). 1983. Language and social identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hostetter, Autumn & Martha Alibali. 2010. Language, gesture, action! A test of the gesture as simulated action framework. Journal of Memory and Language 63. 245–257.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Hubbard, Amy, Stephen Wilson, Daniel Callan & Mirella Deprette. 2009. Giving speech a hand: Gesture modulates activity in auditory cortex during speech perception. Human Brain Mapping 30. 1028–1037.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Ishino, Mika. 2007. Intersubjectivity in gestures: The speaker’s perspective toward the addressee. In Susan D. Duncan, Justine Cassell & Elena T. Levy (eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimension of language (Gesture Studies 1), 243–250. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Israel, Michael. 2011. The grammar of polarity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kelly, Spencer, Asli Özyürek & Eric Maris. 2010. Two sides of the same coin: Speech and gesture mutually interact to enhance comprehension. Psychological Science 21. 260–267.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Kemp, Charles & Terry Regier. 2012. Kinship categories across languages reflect general communicative principles. Science 366. 1049–1054.

  • Kendon, Adam. 1980. Gesture and speech: Two aspects of the same process of utterance. In M. R. Key (ed.), Nonverbal communication and language, 207–227. The Hague: Mouton.

  • Kendon, Adam. 1982. The study of gesture: Some observations on its history. Recherches Sémiotiques/Semiotic Inquiry 2. 45–62.

  • Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kendon, Adam. 2014. The ‘poly-modalic’ nature of utterances and its relevance for inquiring into language origins. In Daniel Dor, Chris Knight & Jerome Lewis (eds.), The social origins of language, 67–76. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Kopp, S. & K. Bergmann. 2013. Automatic and strategic alignment of co-verbal gestures in dialogue. In I. Wachsmuth, J. De Ruiter, P. Jaecks & S. Kopp (eds.), Alignment in communication: Towards a new theory of communication (Advances in Interaction Studies 6), 57–87. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Krieken, Kobie van, José Sanders & Hans Hoeken. 2016. Blended viewpoints, mediated witnesses: A cognitive linguistic approach to news narratives. In Barbara Dancygier, Wei-lun Lu & Arie Verhagen (eds.), Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities, 41–92. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

  • Lakoff, George. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Lakoff, George. 2008. The neuroscience of metaphoric gestures: Why they exist. In Cornelia Müller & Alan Cienki (eds.), Metaphor and gesture (Gesture Studies 3), 283–291. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Lakoff, George. 2012. Explaining embodied cognition results. Topics in Cognitive Science 4. 1–13.

  • Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.

  • Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 2002. Why cognitive linguistics requires embodied realism. Cognitive Linguistics 13(2). 245–263.

  • Langacker, Ronald. 1990. Subjectication. Cognitive Linguistics 1. 5–38.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Langacker, Ronald. 1995. Viewing in cognition and grammar. In Philip W. Davis (ed.), Alternative linguistics. Descriptive and theoretical modes (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 102), 153–212. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Liddell, Scott. 1990. Four functions of a locus: Re-examining the structure of space in ASL. Ciel Lucs (ed.), Research in sign language: Theoretical issues, 176–198. Washington: Gallaudet Press.

  • Liddell, Scott. 2003. Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Lloyd, G. 1966. Polarity and analogy: Two types of argumentation in early Greek thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Mandler, Jean & Cánovas. Cristóbal 2014. On defining image schemas. Language and Cognition 0. 1–23. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Mayer, Richard E. & Roxana Moreno. 2003. Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist 38(1). 43–52.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • McClave, Evelyn, 2000. When you means I: Manual and nonmanual gestures and shifting participation frameworks. In Joy Kreeft Peyton, Peg Griffin, Walt Wolfram & Ralph Fasold (eds.), Language in action: New studies of language in society, Essays in Honor of Roger W. Shuy, 247–259. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

  • McDermott, Kathleen, Cynthia Wooldridge, Heather Rice, Jeffrey Berg & Karl Szpunar. 2016. Visual perspective in remembering and episodic future thought. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 69(2). 243–253.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • McManus, Chris. 2002. Right hand, left hand: The origins of asymmetry in brains, bodies, atoms and cultures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • McNeill, David. 1985. So you think gesture is nonverbal? Psychological Review 92(3). 350–371.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • McNeill, David (ed.). 2005. Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • McNeill, David & Susan D. Duncan. 2000. Growth points in thinking-for-speaking. In David McNeill (ed.), Language and gesture, 141–161. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Melinger, Alissa & Sotaro Kita. 2007. Conceptualization load triggers gesture production. Language and Cognitive Processes 22(4). 473–500.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Merola, Giorgio. 2009. The effects of gesture viewpoint on the student’s memory of words and stories. Gesture-based human-computer interaction and simulation lecture notes in computer science 5085. 272–281.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Miller, George. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63(2). 81–97.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Müller, Cornelia. 2004. Forms and uses of the palm up open hand: A case of a gesture family? In Cornelia Müller & Roland Posner (eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gesture. Berlin: Weilder Buchverlag.

  • Müller, Cornelia. 2008. Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A dynamic view. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Narayan, Shweta. 2012. Maybe what it means is he actually got the spot: Physical and cognitive viewpoint in a gesture study. Barbara Dancygier & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective, 113–139. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Obama, Barak. 2008. A more perfect union. http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/barackobamaperfectunion.htm For video see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWe7wTVbLUU&t=1047s

  • Özyürek, Asli, Sotaro Kita, Shanley Allen, Reyhan Furman & Amanda Brown. 2005. How does the linguistic framing of events influence co-speech gestures? Insight from cross-linguistic variations and similarities. Gesture 5(1/2). 219–240.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Özyürek, Asli, Roel Willems, Sortaro Kita & Peter Hagoort. 2007. On-line integration of semantic information from speech and gesture: Insights from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19. 605–616.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Parrill, Fey. 2009. Dual viewpoint gestures. Gesture 9(3). 271–289.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Parrill, Fey. 2011. The relation between the encoding of motion event information and viewpoint in English-accompanying gestures. Gesture 11(1). 61–80.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Parrill, Fey. 2012. Interactions between discourse status and viewpoint in co-speech gesture. In Barbara Dancygier & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective, 97–122. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Ping, Raedy & Susan Goldin-Meadow. 2010. Gesturing saves cognitive resources when talking about nonpresent objects. Cognitive Science 34(4). 602–619.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Poggi, Isabella & Catherine Pelachaud. 2008. Persuasion and the expressivity of ecas. In I. Wachsmuth, M. Lenzen, & G. Knoblich (eds.), Embodied communication in humans and machines, 391–424. New York: Oxford University Press.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Proctor, Robert & Yang Cho. 2006. Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin 132(3). 416–442.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Rauscher, Frances, Robert Krauss & Yihsiu Chen. 1996. Gesture, speech, and lexical access: The role of lexical movements in speech production. Psychological Science 7(4). 226–231.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Reddy, Vasudevi. 2008. How infants know minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Rotstein, Gary. 2008. Another left-handed president? It’s looking that way. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. February 25. http://www.post-gazette.com/morning-file/2008/02/25/Another-left-handed-president-It-s-looking-that-way/stories/200802250187 (accessed March 1, 2014).

  • Sanders, José. 2012. Intertwined voices: Journalists’ modes of representing source information in journalistic subgenres. In Barbara Dancygier, José Sanders & Lieven Vandelanotte (eds.), Textual choices in discourse: A view from cognitive linguistics, 87–111. Philadelphia, USA: John Benjamins.

  • Sanders, José & Gisela Redeker. 1996. Perspective and the representation of speech and thought in narrative discourse. In Gilles Fauconnier & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Spaces, worlds, and grammar, 290–318. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Sidnell, Jack. 2006. Coordinating gesture, talk and gaze in reenactments. Research on Language and Social Interaction 39(4). 377–409.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Skipper, Jeremey, Susan Goldin-Meadow & Steven Nusbaum. 2009. Gestures orchestrate brain networks for language understanding. Current Biology 19(8). 661–667.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Stec, Kashmiri. 2012. Meaningful shifts: A review of viewpoint markers in gesture and sign language. Gesture 12(3). 327–360.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Steen, Francis & Mark Turner. 2012. Multimodal construction grammar. In Michael Borkent, Barbara Dancygier & Jennifer Hinnell (eds.), Language and the creative mind. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

  • Streeck, Jürgen. 2008. Gesture in political communication: A case study of the democratic presidential candidates during the 2004 primary campaign. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(2). 154–186.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Street, Richard L., Jr. & Joseph N. Cappella. 1989. Social linguistic factors influencing adaptation in children’s speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18(5). 497–519.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Sweetser, Eve. 1998. Regular metaphoricity in gesture: Bodily-based models of speech interaction. Actes du 16e Congrès International des Linguistes (CD-ROM), Elsevier.

  • Sweetser, Eve. 2013. Creativity across modalities in viewpoint-construction. In Michael Borkent, Barbara Dancygier & Jennifer Hinnell (eds.), Language and the creative mind, 239–254. Stanford, US: CSLI publications.

  • Sweetser, Eve. & Şeyda Özçalışkan (eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Studies in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, 357–366. New York & Hove: Psychology Press.

  • Sweetser, Eve & Kashmiri Stec. 2016. Maintaining multiple viewpoints with gaze. In Barbara Dancygier, Lu Wei-Lun & Arie Verhagen (eds.), Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities, 237–258. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

  • Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Grammar from the perspective of cognitive semantics. In Fernandez-Vest (ed.), Grammaticalisation areal et semantique cognitive: Le langues fenniques et sames, 17–25. Tallinn, Estonia: Foundation of the Estonian Language.

  • Talmy, Leonard. 2003. The representation of spatial structure in spoken and signed language. In Karen Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign language, 169–196. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Tomasello, Michael. 2014. A natural history of human thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Turner, Mark. 1991. Reading minds: The study of English in the age of cognitive science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Turner, Mark. 1998. Figure. In A. N. Katz, C. Cacciari & M. Turner (eds.), Figurative language and thought. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Vandelanotte, Lieven. 2012a. ‘Wait till you got started’: How to submerge another’s discourse in your own. In Barbara Dancygier & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective, 198–218. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Vandelanotte, Lieven. 2012b. Quotative go and be like: Grammar and grammaticalization. In I. Buchstaller & I. Van Alphen (eds.), Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives 15, 173–202. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Vandelanotte, Lieven. 2015. “More than one way at once”: Simultaneous viewpoints in text and image. In A. Benedek & K. Nyíri (eds.), Beyond words: Pictures, parables, paradoxes, 75–81. Frankfurt: Peter Lang Verlag.

  • Vanderbiesen, Jeroen. 2016. Mixed viewpoints and the quotative-reportive cline in German: Reported speech and reportive evidentiality. In Barbara Dancygier, Lu Wei-Lun & Arie Verhagen (eds.), Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities, 41–92. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

  • Verhagen, Arie. 2005. Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Wilson, Nicole & Raymond Gibbs. 2007. Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science 31. 721–731.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Winter, Bodo & Teenie Matlock. 2013. Making judgments based on similarity and proximity. Metaphor and Symbol 28. 219–232.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Wu, Choon Ying & Seana Coulson. 2007. Iconic gestures prime related concepts: An ERP study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14(1). 57–63.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Wu, Choon Ying & Seana Coulson. 2014. Co-speech iconic gestures and visuo-spatial working memory. Acta Psychologica 153. 39–50.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Zwaan, Rolf. 2004. The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B. H. Ross (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation 44, 35–62. New York: Academic Press.

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
$42.00
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


or
Log in with your institution

Journal + Issues

Cognitive Linguistics presents a forum for linguistic research of all kinds on the interaction between language and cognition. The journal focuses on language as an instrument for organizing, processing and conveying information. It is devoted to high-quality research on topics such as the structural characteristics of natural language categorization and the functional principles of linguistic organization.

Search