The meanings of sharing: On Facebook sharing strategies among Polish migrants in Germany and the UK

Kamil Filipek 1
  • 1 Institute of Sociology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin, Poland
Kamil Filipek


Sharing on social media has become a daily routine for millions of users worldwide. Sharing transforms the experience of international migration as it enables migrants to maintain social relations and adapt to a new socioeconomic environment. But what does the term “sharing” mean for migrants active on Facebook? What are the contemporary meanings of sharing encouraged by Facebook’s affordances? This paper explores individual sharing strategies on Facebook among Polish migrants in Germany and the UK. On the basis of the material collected through in-depth interviews (N=17) with Poles who have settled in Germany and the UK, it is proposed that the contemporary meaning of sharing has five dimensions: commercial, altruistic, social, connective and addictive. Different compositions of these dimensions can be found in most sharing practices on social media. Following a critique of commercial sharing on social media, it is further established that selling and other profit-driven activities are rather well recognized by the interviewees. However, some of them engage in commercial sharing with no direct selling intention. The article emphasizes that sharing practices help Polish migrants adapt to their bicultural reality in Germany and the UK

  • Alencar, A. (2017). Refugee integration and social media: A local and experiential perspective. Information Communication and Society, 21(11), 1588–1603.

  • Andreassen, C. S., Torsheim, T., Brunborg, G. S., & Pallesen, S. (2012). Development of a Facebook Addiction Scale. Psychological Reports, 110(2), 501–517.

  • Baborska-Narożny, M., Stirling, E., & Stevenson, F. (2016). Exploring the relationship between a “Facebook group” and face-to-face interactions in “weak-tie” residential communities. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Social Media & Society – SMSociety, 1–8: ACM Press.

  • Bakardjieva, M. (2014). Social media and the McDonaldization of friendship. Communications, 39(4), 369–387.

  • Belk, R. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1595–1600.

  • Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.

  • Booth, P. (2010). Digital fandom: New media studies. Peter Lang – Digital Formations. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

  • Botsman, R. (2015). Defining the sharing economy: What is collaborative consumption – and what isn’t? Fast Company, 1–20.

  • Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2010). What’s mine is yours. The rise of collaborative consumption. New York: Harper Business.

  • boyd, d. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), Networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). New York, London: Routledge.

  • Bucher, E., Fieseler, C., & Lutz, C. (2016). What’s mine is yours (for a nominal fee) – Exploring the spectrum of utilitarian to altruistic motives for internet-mediated sharing. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 316–326.

  • Buczynski, B. (2013). Sharing is good. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.

  • Burrell, K. (2010). Staying, returning, working and living: Key themes in current academic research undertaken in the UK on migration movements from Eastern Europe. Social Identities, 16(3), 297–308.

  • Cabassa, L. J. (2003). Measuring Acculturation: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go. Hispanic Journal Of Behavioral Sciences, 25(2), 127–146.

  • Cassar, C., Gauci, J. P., & Bacchi, A. (2016). Migrants’ use of social media in Malta. People for Change Foundation. Retrieved 08/25/2017 from

  • Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Chemero, A. (2003). An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 181–195.

  • Cirucci, A. M. (2015). Facebook’s affordances, visible culture, and anti-anonymity. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Social Media & Society – SMSociety, 1–5: ACM Press.

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded Theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21.

  • Dekker, R., & Engbersen, G. (2014). How social media transform migrant networks and facilitate migration. Global Networks, 14(4), 401–418.

  • Fihel, A., & Górny, A. (2013). To settle or to leave again? Patterns of return migration to Poland during the transition period. Central and Eastern European Migration Review, 2(1), 55–76.

  • Filipek, K. (2016). Sharing resources on Facebook groups: Polish emigrants in Germany, Norway and UK. Konteksty Społeczne/Social Contexts, Special Issue: Rediscovering Society in the Age of Social Media, 4(1), 42–53.

  • Fuchs, C. (2015). Culture and economy in the age of social media. New York: Routledge.

  • Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. New York: Psychology Press.

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Observations (Vol. 1). New Brunswick, London: Aldine Transaction.

  • Humphreys, A. (2016). Social media. Enduring principle. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Idris, Y., & Wang, Q. (2009). Affordances of Facebook for learning. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 19(2/3), 247–255.

  • John, N. A. (2012). Sharing and web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword. New Media & Society, 15(2), 167–182.

  • John, N. A. (2013). The social logics of sharing. The Communication Review, 16(3), 113–131.

  • John, N. A. (2017). The age of sharing (1st ed.). Cambridge, Malden: Polity Press.

  • Karnik, M., Oakley, I., Venkatanathan, J., Spiliotopoulos, T., & Nisi, V. (2013). Uses & gratifications of a Facebook media sharing group. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on computer-supported cooperative work (pp. 821–826).

  • Klausen, J. (2015). Tweeting the Jihad: Social media networks of Western foreign fighters in Syria and Iraq. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 38(1), 1–22.

  • Komito, L. (2011). Social media and migration: Virtual community 2.0. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 62(6), 1075–1086.

  • Luthra, R. R., Platt, L., & Salamonska, J. (2014). Migrant diversity, migration motivations and early integration: The case of Poles in Germany, the Netherlands, London and Dublin. LEQS Paper.

  • Majchrzak, A., Faraj, S., Kane, G. C., & Azad, B. (2013). The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 38–55.

  • Meikle, G. (2016). Social media. Communication, sharing and visibility. London,d New York: Routledge.

  • Nix, J., Smith, M. R., Petrocelli, M., Rojek, J., & Manjarrez, V. M. (2016). The use of social media by alleged members of Mexican cartels and affiliated drug trafficking organizations. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 13(3), 395–418.

  • Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, Conventions, and Design. Interactions, 6(3), 38–42.

  • Norman, D. A. (2008). The way I see it. Signifiers, not affordances. Interactions, 15(6), 18–19.

  • Novick, G. (2008). Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research? Research in Nursing and Health, 31(4), 391–398.

  • Okólski, M., & Salt, J. (2014). Polish emigration to the UK after 2004: Why did so many come? Central and Eastern European Migration Review, 3(2), 1–37.

  • Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press.

  • Reips, U. D., & Buffardi, L. E. (2012). Studying migrants with the help of the internet: Methods from psychology. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(9), 1405–1424.

  • Schwartz, S. J., & Unger, J. B. (2010). Biculturalism and context: What is biculturalism, and when is it adaptive? Human Development, 53(1), 26–32.

  • Shuy, R. W. (2003) In-person versus telephone interviewing. In Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (Eds.) Inside interviewing: New lenses, new concerns (pp. 175–193). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

  • Sumption, M. (2009). Social networks and Polish immigration to the UK. Economics of migration working paper (Vol. 5). Retrieved: 05/12/2018 from

  • Titzmann, P. F., & Fuligni, A. J. (2015). Immigrants’ adaptation to different cultural settings: A contextual perspective on acculturation. International Journal of Psychology, 50(6), 407–412.

  • van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity. A critical history of social media. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Widlok, T. (2013). Sharing: Allowing others to take what is valued. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3(2), 11–31.

  • Zhao, Y., Liu, J., Tang, J., & Zhu, Q. (2013). Conceptualizing perceived affordances in social media interaction design. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 65(3), 289–302.

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.

Log in with your institution

Journal + Issues

The European Journal of Communication Research is an established forum for scholarship and academic debate in the field of communication science and research from a European perspective. Communications highlights the concerns of communication science through the publication of articles, research reports, review essays and book reviews on theoretical and methodological developments considered from a European perspective.