Epistemological and methodical challenges in the research on embedded advertising formats: A constructivist interjection

Nils S. Borchers 1  and Jens Woelke 2
  • 1 Institute of Media Studies, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
  • 2 Department of Communication, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Münster, Deutschland
Nils S. Borchers and Jens Woelke

Abstract

Advertisers’ increasing use of embedded advertising formats makes it more difficult for consumers to identify persuasive intents in advertiser messages. However, only if consumers identify these intents and categorize messages as advertising, can they activate advertising-specific reception strategies which might result in lessened persuasion effects. The fact that consumers regularly miss persuasive intents in non-traditional advertising environments, we suggest in this article, carries epistemological and methodical implications. To better appreciate these implications, we argue for a more systematic adoption of a constructivist approach in advertising research. Some established concepts in advertising research such as the persuasion knowledge model and advertising literacy already implicitly follow a constructivist rationale. However, to more fully exploit the potential of a constructivist approach, we review communication concepts that inform advertising research, clarify why a constructivist approach increases the explanatory power of advertising research, and discuss challenges for research designs.

  • Allen, C., Fournier, S., & Miller, F. (2008). Brands and their meaning makers. In C. P. Haugtvedt, P. Herr, & F. R. Kardes (Eds.), Handbook of consumer psychology (pp. 781–822). New York: Erlbaum.

  • Amazeen, M. A., & Muddiman, A. R. (2017). Saving media or trading on trust: The effects of native advertising on audience perceptions of legacy and online news publishers. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 176–195.

  • Austin, P. C. (2011). An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 399–424.

  • Axelrod, R. (1973). Schema theory: An information processing model of perception and cognition. American Political Science Review, 67, 1248–1266.

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

  • Beattie, A. E., & Mitchell, A. A. (1985). The relationship between advertising recall and persuasion: An experimental investigation. In L. F. Alwitt, & A. A. Mitchell (Eds.), Psychological process and advertising effectiveness: Theory, research, and application (pp. 129–155). Hillsdale: LEA.

  • Belch, G. E., & Belch, M. A. (2012). Advertising and promotion: An integrated marketing communications perspective. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City: Doubleday.

  • Bergmann, J. R., & Luckmann, T. (1995). Reconstructive genres of everyday communication. In U. Quasthoff (Ed.), Aspects of oral communication (pp. 289–304). Berlin: De Gruyter.

  • Boerman, S. C., van Reijmersdal, E. A., & Neijens, P. C. (2014). Using eye tracking to understand the effects of brand placement disclosure types in television programs. Journal of Advertising, 44(4), 196–207.

  • Borchers, N. S. (2014). Werbekommunikation: Entwurf einer kommunikationswissenschaftlichen Theorie der Werbung [ Advertising communication: Developing a communications theory of advertising]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

  • Borchers, N. S. (2017). Crossing the borders: A theory of hybrid advertising formats. In J. F. Hamilton, R. Bodle, & E. Korin (Eds.), Explorations in critical studies of advertising (pp. 195–207). New York: Routledge.

  • Boush, D. M., Friestad, M., & Rose, G. M. (1994). Adolescent skepticism toward TV advertising and knowledge of advertiser tactics. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 165–175.

  • Buijzen, M. (2007). Reducing children’s susceptibility to commercials: Mechanisms of factual and evaluative advertising interventions. Media Psychology, 9, 411–430.

  • Buijzen, M., van Reijmersdal, E. A., & Owen, L. H. (2010). Introducing the PCMC model: An investigative framework for young people’s processing of commercialized media content. Communication Theory, 20(4), 427–450.

  • Buttle, F. A. (1991). What do people do with advertising? International Journal of Advertising, 10(2), 95–110.

  • Buttle, F. A. (1995). Marketing communication theory: What do the texts teach our students? International Journal of Advertising, 14, 297–313.

  • Calder, B. J., & Sternthal, B. (1980). Television commercial wearout: An information processing view. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(2), 1731–1786.

  • Campbell, M. C., & Kirmani, A. (2008). I know what you’re doing and why you’re doing it: The use of the persuasion knowledge model in consumer research. In C. P. Haugtvedt, P. Herr, & F. R. Kardes (Eds.), Handbook of consumer psychology (pp. 549–572). New York, NY: Erlbaum.

  • Cornish, L. S. (2014). ‘Mum, can I play on the internet?’ Parents’ understanding, perception and responses to online advertising designed for children. International Journal of Advertising, 33(3), 437–473.

  • Delia, J. G. (1977). Constructivism and the study of human communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 63(1), 66–83.

  • Dervin, B. (2003). Information as non-sense; information as sense: The communication technology connection. In B. Dervin, L. Foreman-Wernet, & E. Lauterbach (Eds.), Sense-making methodology reader: Selected writings of Brenda Dervin (pp. 293–308). Cresskill: Hampton.

  • Donohue, T. R., Meyer, T. P., & Henke, L. L. (1978). Black and white children: Perceptions of TV commercials. Journal of Marketing, 42(4), 34–40.

  • Elliott, M. T., & Speck, P. S. (1998). Consumer perceptions of advertising clutter and its impact across various media. Journal of Advertising Research, 38(1), 29–41.

  • Evans, N. J., & Park, D. (2015). Rethinking the Persuasion Knowledge Model: Schematic antecedents and associative outcomes of persuasion knowledge activation for covert advertising. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 36(2), 157–176.

  • Finne, Å., & Grönroos, C. (2009). Rethinking marketing communication: From integrated marketing communication to relationship communication. Journal of Marketing Communications, 15(2–3), 179–195.

  • Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1–31.

  • Glasersfeld, E. v. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: Routledge.

  • Hackley, C. E. (1999). An epistemological odyssey: Towards social construction of the advertising process. Journal of Marketing Communications, 5, 157–168.

  • Ham, C.-D., Nelson, M. R., & Das, S. (2015). How to measure persuasion knowledge. International Journal of Advertising, 34(1), 17–53.

  • Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258–268.

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford.

  • Hippler, H. J., Schwarz, N., & Sudman, S. (Eds.) (1987). Social information processing and survey methodology. New York: Springer.

  • Isaac, M. S., & Grayson, K. (2017). Beyond skepticism: Can accessing persuasion knowledge bolster credibility? Journal of Consumer Research, 43, 895–912.

  • Jiang, M., McKay, B. A., Richards, J. I., & Snyder, W. (2017). Now you see me, but you don’t know: Consumer processing of native advertisements in online news sites. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 17(2), 92–108.

  • Kim, B.-H., Pasadeos, Y., & Barban, A. (2001). On the deceptive effectiveness of labeled and unlabeled advertorial formats. Mass Communication & Society, 4(3), 265–281.

  • Kirmani, A., & Campbell, M. C. (2004). Goal seeker and persuasion sentry: How consumer targets respond to interpersonal marketing persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 573–582.

  • Kotler, P., Armstrong, G., Harris, L. C., & Piercy, N. (2013). Principles of marketing (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.

  • Krallmann, D., Scheerer, R. C., & Strahl, C. (1997). Werbung als kommunikative Gattung [Advertising as communicative genre]. Sociologia Internationalis, 2, 195–216.

  • Krippendorff, K. (1994). A recursive theory of communication. In D. J. Crowley, & D. Mitchell (Eds.), Communication theory today (pp. 78–104). Cambridge: Polity.

  • Kunkel, D. (2010). Mismeasurement of children’s understanding of the persuasive intent of advertising. Journal of Children and Media, 4(1), 109–117.

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas (pp. 37–51). New York: Harper.

  • Levinson, S. C. (1979). Activity types and language. Linguistics, 17, 365–399.

  • Livingstone, S. (2009). Debating children’s susceptibility to persuasion – Where does fairness come in? A commentary on the Nairn and Fine versus Ambler debate. International Journal of Advertising, 28(1), 170–174.

  • Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2006). Does advertising literacy mediate the effects of advertising on children? A critical examination of two linked research literatures in relation to obesity and food choice. Journal of Communication, 56(3), 560–584.

  • Lüders, M., Prøitz, L., & Rasmussen, T. (2010). Emerging personal media genres. New Media & Society, 12(6), 947–963.

  • Matthes, J., Schemer, C., & Wirth, W. (2007). More than meets the eye: Investigating the hidden impact of brand placements in television magazines. International Journal of Advertising, 26, 477–503.

  • Matthes, J., Wirth, W., Schemer, C., & Kissling, A.-K. (2011). I see what you don’t see: The role of individual differences in field dependence-independence as a predictor of product placement recall and brand liking. Journal of Advertising, 40(4), 85–100.

  • McCracken, G. (1987). Advertising: Meaning or information? Advances in Consumer Research, 14(1), 121–124.

  • Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151–167.

  • Nairn, A., & Fine, C. (2008). Who’s messing with my mind? The implications of dual-process models for the ethics of advertising to children. International Journal of Advertising, 27(3), 447–470.

  • Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. San Franciso: Freeeman.

  • Obermiller, C., & Spangenberg, E. R. (1998). Development of a scale to measure consumer skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(2), 159–186.

  • Pateman, T. (1983). How is understanding an advertisement possible? In H. Davis, & P. Walton (Eds.), Language, image, media (pp. 187–203). New York: St. Martin’s.

  • Pauly, J. (1977). The case for a new model of business communication. Journal of Business Communication, 14(4), 11–23.

  • Puntoni, S., Schroeder, J. E., & Ritson, M. (2010). Meaning matters: Polysemy in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 39(2), 51–64.

  • Redondo, I. (2012). The behavioral effects of negative product placements in movies. Psychology & Marketing, 29(8), 622–635.

  • Richards, J. I., & Curran, C. M. (2002). Oracles on “advertising”: Searching for a definition. Journal of Advertising, 31(2), 63–77.

  • Roberts, D. F. (1983). Children and commercials. Prevention in Human Services, 2(1–2), 19–35.

  • Rozendaal, E., Lapierre, M. A., van Reijmersdal, E. A., & Buijzen, M. (2011). Reconsidering advertising literacy as a defense against advertising effects. Media Psychology, 14, 333–354.

  • Schmidt, S. J. (1987). Towards a constructivist theory of media genre. Poetics, 16, 371–395.

  • Schudson, M. (1978). Discovering the news: A social history of American newspapers. New York: Basic Books.

  • Schultz, D. E. (1995). What is direct marketing? Journal of Direct Marketing, 9, 5–9.

  • Schwarz, N., Kumpf, M., & Bussmann, W. (1986). Resistance to persuasion as a consequence of influence attempts in advertising and non-advertising communications. Psychology, 23, 72–76.

  • Shankar, A. (1999). Advertising’s imbroglio. Journal of Marketing Communications, 5(1), 1–15.

  • Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois.

  • Shapiro, M. E. (1994). Signal detection measures of recognition memory. In A. Lang (Ed.), Measuring psychological responses to media (pp. 133–148). Hillsdale: LEA.

  • Speck, P. S., & Elliott, M. T. (1997). Predictors of advertising avoidance in print and broadcast media. Journal of Advertising, 26(3), 61–76.

  • Thompson, D. V., & Hamilton, R. W. (2006). The effects of information processing mode on consumers’ responses to comparative advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 530–540.

  • Tutaj, K., & van Reijmersdal, E. A. (2012). Effects of online advertising format and persuasion knowledge on audience reactions. Journal of Marketing Communications, 18(1), 5–18.

  • van Reijmersdal, E. A., Lammers, N., Rozendaal, E., & Buijzen, M. (2015). Disclosing the persuasive nature of advergames: Moderation effects of mood on brand responses via persuasion knowledge. International Journal of Advertising, 34(1), 70–84.

  • Varey, R. J. (2000). A critical review of conceptions of communication evident in contemporary business and management literature. Journal of Communication Management, 4(4), 328–340.

  • Waiguny, M. K., Nelson, M. R., & Terlutter, R. (2014). The relationship of persuasion knowledge, identification of commercial intent and persuasion outcomes in advergames: The role of media context and presence. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37(2), 257–277.

  • Warlaumont, H. G. (1997). Appropriate reality: Consumers’ perceptions of schema-inconsistent advertising. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74(1), 39–54.

  • Wei, M.-L., Fischer, E., & Main, K. J. (2008). An examination of the effects of activating persuasion knowledge on consumer response to brands engaging in covert marketing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 27(1), 34–44.

  • Wiman, A. R. (1983). Parental influence and children’s responses to television advertising. Journal of Advertising, 12(1), 12–18.

  • Woelke, J. (2004). Durch Rezeption zur Werbung: Kommunikative Abgrenzung von Fernsehgattungen [Via reception to advertising: Communicative definition of TV genres]. Köln: Halem.

  • Woelke, J. (2008). Nicht alle, aber einige mehr. Werbewirkungen unter dynamisch-transaktionaler Perspektive [Not all of them do but a few more. Advertising effects from a dynamic-transactional perspective]. In C. Wünsch, W. Früh, & V. Gehrau (Eds.), Integrative Modelle in der Rezeptions- und Wirkungsforschung: Dynamische und transaktionale Perspektiven (pp. 81–106). München: Fischer.

  • Woelke, J., & Kolb, S. (2013). Wenn Mediendarbietungen Antwortleistung und Antwortdisposition gleichzeitig bestimmen. Ursache-Wirkungs-Konvergenz als Problem der medien- und werbepsychologischen Forschung und Item-Response-Analyse als ein Lösungsvorschlag [When media presentations determine discrimination and response bias at the same time. Cause-effect-convergence as problem of the research on media and advertising psychology, and item-response-analysis as proposed solution]. Journal of Business and Media Psychology, 4(1), 53–64.

  • Woelke, J., & Pelzer, E. (2017). Think-aloud method and thought-listing technique. In J. Matthes, R. Potter, & C. S. Davis (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (pp. 1-9). New York: Wiley & Sons.

  • Wojdynski, B. W., & Evans, N. J. (2016). Going native: Effects of disclosure position and language on the recognition and evaluation of online native advertising. Journal of Advertising, 45(2), 157–168.

  • Yoo, C. Y. (2009). The effects of persuasion knowledge on click-through of keyword search ads: Moderating role of search task and perceived fairness. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(2), 401–418.

  • Zerfaß, A. (2009). Kommunikation als konstitutives Element im Innovationsmanagement [Communication as constitutive element in innovation management]. In A. Zerfaß, & K. M. Möslein (Eds.), Kommunikation als Erfolgsfaktor im Innovationsmanagement: Strategien im Zeitalter der Open Innovation (pp. 23–55). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
$42.00
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


or
Log in with your institution

Journal + Issues

Search