Like-minded and cross-cutting talk, network characteristics, and political participation online and offline: A panel study

Jörg Matthes 1 , Franziska Marquart 2  and Christian von Sikorski 3
  • 1 Department of Communication, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • 2 Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • 3 Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz-Landau, Landau, Germany
Jörg Matthes, Franziska Marquart and Christian von Sikorski


We test the role of like-minded and cross-cutting political discussion as a facilitator of online and offline political participation and examine the role of strong versus weak network ties. Most prior research on the topic has employed cross-sectional designs that may lead to spurious relationships due to the lack of controlled variables. The findings of a two-wave panel survey controlling the autoregressive effects suggest that cross-cutting talk with weak ties significantly dampens online but not offline political participation. However, no such effects were detectable for cross-cutting talk with strong ties. In addition, we found no effect of discussions involving like-minded individuals in either weak or strong network connections on online and offline forms of political engagement. Implications are discussed.

  • Bello, J. (2012). The dark side of disagreement? Revisiting the effect of disagreement on political participation. Electoral Studies, 31, 782–795. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2012.06.004

  • Bello, J., & Rolfe, M. (2014). Is influence mightier than selection? Forging agreement in political discussion networks during a campaign. Social Networks, 36, 134–146. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2013.06.001

  • Bernhard, U., & Dohle, M. (2018). Perceptual processes and political participation: Do the presumed reach and the presumed influence of social media affect political activities via Facebook and Twitter? Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 43(4), 451–467. doi:10.1515/commun-2017–0052

  • Eveland, W. P., & Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and ‘heterogeneity’ of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 205–224. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01412.x

  • Eveland, W. P., Song, H., Hutchens, M. J., & Levitan, L. C. (2019). Not being accurate is not quite the same as being inaccurate: Variations in reported (in)accuracy of perceptions of political views of network members due to uncertainty. Communication Methods and Measures, 13, 305–311. doi:10.1080/19312458.2019.1612865

  • Foos, F., & de Rooj, E. A. (2016). All in the family: Partisan disagreement and electoral mobilization in intimate networks – A spillover experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 61(2), 289–304. doi:10.1111/ajps.12270

  • Glynn, C. J., Hayes, A. F., & Shanahan, J. (1997). Perceived support for one’s opinions and willingness to speak out: A meta-analysis of survey studies on the ‘spiral of silence’. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(3), 452–463. doi:10.1086/297808

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.

  • Ikeda, K. I., & Boase, J. (2011). Multiple discussion networks and their consequence for political participation. Communication Research, 38(5), 660–683. doi:10.1177/0093650210395063

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

  • Klofstad, C. A., Sokhey, A. E., & McClurg, S. D. (2013). Disagreeing about disagreement: How conflict in social networks affects political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 57(1), 120–134. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00620.x

  • Knoll, J., Matthes, J., & Heiss, R. (2020). The social media political participation model: A goal systems theory perspective. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 26(1), 135-156. doi:10.1177/1354856517750366

  • Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Lee, J., & Choi, Y. (2018). Hasty discussion, cross-cutting exposure, and tolerance: A comparative study of South Korean and American online discussants. International Communication Gazette, 80(6), 570–594. doi:10.1177/1748048518754376

  • Lu, Y., Heatherly, K. A., & Lee, J. K. (2016). Cross-cutting exposure on social network sites: The effects of SNS discussion disagreement on political participation. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 74–81. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.030

  • Matthes, J. (2012). Exposure to counter-attitudinal news and the timing of voting decisions. Communication Research, 39, 147–169. doi:10.1177/0093650211402322

  • Matthes, J. (2013). Do hostile opinion environments harm political participation? The moderating role of generalized social trust. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(1), 23–42. doi:10.1093/ijpor/eds006

  • Matthes, J., Knoll, J., Valenzuela, S., Hopmann, D. N., & von Sikorski, C. (2019). A meta-analysis of the effects of cross-cutting exposure on political participation. Political Communication, 36(4), 523–542. doi:10.1080/10584609.2019.1619638

  • Matthes, J., & Marquart, F. (2015). A new look at campaign advertising and political engagement: Exploring the effects of opinion-congruent and -incongruent political advertising. Communication Research, 42(1), 134–155. doi:10.1177/0093650213514600

  • McGhee, E., & Sides, J. (2011). Do campaigns drive partisan turnout? Political Behavior, 33(2), 313–333. doi:0.1007/s11109-010-9127-8

  • Miller, P. R., Bobkowski, P. S., Maliniak, D., & Rapoport, R. B. (2015). Talking politics on Facebook: Network centrality and political discussion practices in social media. Political Research Quarterly, 68(2), 377–391. doi:10.1177/1065912915580135

  • Morey, A. C., Eveland, W. P. Jr., & Hutchens, M. J. (2012). The ‘who’ matters: Types of interpersonal relationships and avoidance of political disagreement. Political Communication, 29(1), 86–103. doi:10.1080/10584609.2011.641070

  • Mutz, D. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 838–855. doi:10.2307/3088437

  • Nir, L. (2005). Ambivalent social networks and their consequences for participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(4), 422–442.

  • Nir, L. (2011). Disagreement and opposition in social networks: Does disagreement discourage turnout? Political Studies, 59, 674–692. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00873.x

  • Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x

  • Pang, N., Ho, S. S., Zhang, A. M. R., Ko, J. S. W., Low, W. X., & Tan, K. S. Y. (2016). Can spiral of silence and civility predict click speech on Facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 898–905. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.066

  • Pattie, C. J., & Johnston, R. J. (2008). Conversation, disagreement and political participation. Political Behavior, 31(2), 261–285. doi:10.1007/slll09-008-9071-z

  • Roch, C. H., Scholz, J. T., & McGraw, K. M. (2000). Social networks and citizen response to social change. American Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 777–791. doi:10.2307/2669281

  • Torcal, M., & Maldonado, G. (2014). Revisiting the dark side of political deliberation: The effects of media and political discussion on political interest. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(3), 679–706. doi:10.1093/poq/nfu035

  • Valenzuela, S., Kim, Y., & Gil De Zúñiga, H. (2012). Social networks that matter: Exploring the role of political discussion for online political participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 163–184. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edr037

  • Vermeulen, J., & Hartmann, T. (2015). Questionable research and publication practices in communication science. Communication Methods & Measures, 9, 189–192. doi:10.1080/19312458.2015.1096331

  • Vissers, S., & Stolle, D. (2014). The internet and new modes of political participation: Online versus offline participation. Information, Communication and Society, 17(8), 937–955.

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.

Log in with your institution

Journal + Issues

The European Journal of Communication Research is an established forum for scholarship and academic debate in the field of communication science and research from a European perspective. Communications highlights the concerns of communication science through the publication of articles, research reports, review essays and book reviews on theoretical and methodological developments considered from a European perspective.