Maximum asymmetry of copulas revisited

Noppadon Kamnitui 1 , Juan Fernández-Sánchez 2 ,  and Wolfgang Trutschnig 1
  • 1 Department for Mathematics, University of Salzburg, , Salzburg, Austria
  • 2 Grupo de Investigación de Análisis Matemático, Universidad de Almería, La Cañada de San Urbano, , Almería, Spain


Motivated by the nice characterization of copulas A for which d(A, At) is maximal as established independently by Nelsen [11] and Klement & Mesiar [7], we study maximum asymmetry with respect to the conditioning-based metric D1 going back to Trutschnig [12]. Despite the fact that D1(A, At) is generally not straightforward to calculate, it is possible to provide both, a characterization and a handy representation of all copulas A maximizing D1(A, At). This representation is then used to prove the existence of copulas with full support maximizing D1(A, At). A comparison of D1- and d-asymmetry including some surprising examples rounds off the paper.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Devroye, L. (1987). A Course in Density Estimation. Birkhäuser, Boston MA.

  • [2] Durante, F. and C. Sempi (2016). Principles of Copula Theory. CRC Press, Boca Raton FL.

  • [3] Fernández-Sánchez, J. and W. Trutschnig (2015). Conditioning-based metrics on the space of multivariate copulas and their interrelation with uniform and levelwise convergence and iterated function systems. J. Theoret. Probab. 28(4), 1311-1336.

  • [4] Fernández-Sánchez, J. and W. Trutschnig (2016). Some members of the class of (quasi-)copulas with given diagonal from the Markov kernel perspective. Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 45(5), 1508-1526.

  • [5] Harder, M. and U. Stadtmüller (2014). Maximal non-exchangeability in dimension d. J. Multivariate Anal. 124, 31-41.

  • [6] Kallenberg, O. (1997). Foundations of Modern Probability. Springer, New York.

  • [7] Klement, E. P. and R. Mesiar (2006). How non-symmetric can a copula be? Comment. Math. Univ. Carolin. 47(1), 141-148.

  • [8] Klenke, A. (2008). Probability Theory. A Comprehensive Course. Springer, London.

  • [9] Kolesárová, A., R. Mesiar, and C. Sempi (2008). Measure-preserving transformations, copulæ and compatibility. Mediterr. J. Math. 5(3), 325-339.

  • [10] Nelsen, R. B. (2006). An Introduction to Copulas. Second edition. Springer, New York.

  • [11] Nelson, R. B. (2007). Extremes of nonexchangeability. Statist. Papers 48(2), 329-336.

  • [12] Trutschnig, W. (2011). On a strong metric on the space of copulas and its induced dependence measure. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 384(2), 690-705.

  • [13] Trutschnig, W. and J. Fernández-Sánchez (2012). Idempotent and multivariate copulas with fractal support. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 142(12), 3086-3096.

  • [14] Trutschnig,W., M. Schreyer, and J. Fernández-Sánchez (2016). Mass distributions of two-dimensional extreme-value copulas and related results. Extremes 19(3), 405-427.


Journal + Issues

Dependence Modeling aims to provide a medium for exchanging results and ideas in the area of multivariate dependence modeling. Topics include Copula methods, environmental sciences, estimation and goodness-of-fit tests, extreme-value theory, limit laws, mass transportations, measures of association, multivariate distributions and tests, quantitative risk management, risk assessment, risk models, risk measures and stochastic orders and time series.