Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter August 30, 2018

Invisible Coattails: Presidential Approval and Gubernatorial Elections, 1994–2014

  • Elliott Fullmer

    Dr. Elliott Fullmer is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Randolph-Macon College. His research focuses on elections and voting behavior in the US.

    EMAIL logo
    and Rebecca Daniel

    Mrs. Rebecca Daniel graduated with a political science degree from Randolph-Macon College in 2016. She is now pursuing a career in political advocacy.

    EMAIL logo
From the journal The Forum

Abstract

Hoping to insulate their contests from national politics, thirty-six states hold their gubernatorial elections in national midterm election years. Many scholars have assessed whether presidential evaluations nevertheless have an effect on these races, though findings have varied. We offer a new approach to examining this question, relying on underutilized state-level presidential approval data preceding 143 gubernatorial races across six national midterm election cycles. Accounting for the effects of state ideology, gubernatorial approval, campaign spending, state economic performance, and incumbency, we report that presidential approval has a positive and significant effect on the performance of the presidential party in gubernatorial races. The substantive effects are modest, though still potentially meaningful. In the primary specification, an additional six points of presidential approval is associated with about one additional point of gubernatorial vote share.


Corresponding authors: Dr. Elliott Fullmer and Mrs. Rebecca Daniel, Randolph-Macon College, 114 College Ave., Ashland, VA 23005, USA

About the authors

Elliott Fullmer

Dr. Elliott Fullmer is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Randolph-Macon College. His research focuses on elections and voting behavior in the US.

Rebecca Daniel

Mrs. Rebecca Daniel graduated with a political science degree from Randolph-Macon College in 2016. She is now pursuing a career in political advocacy.

References

Abramowitz, Alan, and Steven Webster. 2015. “All Politics is National: The Rise of Negative Partisanship and the Nationalization of U.S. House and Senate Elections in the 21st Century.” Prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois, April 16–19, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Alesina, Alberto, and Howard Rosenthal. 1995. Partisan Politics, Divided Government and the Economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511720512Search in Google Scholar

Atkeson, Lonna Rae, and Randall W. Partin. 1995. “Economic and Referendum Voting: A Comparison of Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections.” The American Political Science Review 89 (1): 99–107.10.2307/2083077Search in Google Scholar

Bafumi, Joseph, and Robert Y. Shapiro. 2009. “A New Partisan Voter.” The Journal of Politics 71 (1): 1–24.10.1017/S0022381608090014Search in Google Scholar

Bailey, Michael, and Elliott Fullmer. 2011. “Balancing in the U.S. States, 1978–2009.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 11 (2): 148–166.10.1177/1532440011406230Search in Google Scholar

Berry, William D., Evan J. Ringquist, Richard C. Fording, and Russell L. Hanson. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States.” American Journal of Political Science 42: 327–348.10.2307/2991759Search in Google Scholar

Berry, William D., Evan J. Ringquist, Richard C. Fording, and Russell L. Hanson. 2007. “The Measurement and Stability of State Citizen Ideology.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 7: 111–132.10.1177/153244000700700201Search in Google Scholar

Beyle, Thad, and Lynn Muchmore, eds. 1983. Being Governor: The View from the Office. Durham, NC: Duke Press Policy Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Beyle, Thad L., and Jennifer Jensen. 2015. “Gubernatorial Campaign Expenditures Database.” Available at http://www.unc.edu/∼beyle/guber.html (August 10, 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Beyle, Thad, Richard Niemi, and Lee Sigelman. 2002. “Gubernatorial, Senatorial, and State-level Presidential Job Approval: The U.S. Officials Job Approval Ratings (JAR) Collection.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2 (3): 215–229.10.1177/153244000200200301Search in Google Scholar

Beyle, Thad, Richard Niemi, and Lee Sigelman. 2006. “Job Approval Ratings.” The University of Rochester, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, & George Washington University. Available at http://www.unc.edu/%7Ebeyle/jars.html.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, Angus. 1966. “Surge and Decline: A Study of Electoral Change.” In Elections and the Political Order, edited by Angus Campbell, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller and Donald E. Stokes, 40–62. New York: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, James E. 1985. “Explaining Presidential Losses in Midterm Congressional Elections.” Journal of Politics 47: 1140–1157.10.2307/2130810Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, James E. 1991. “The Presidential Surge and its Midterm Decline in Congressional Elections.” Journal of Politics 53: 477–487.10.1017/S0022381600048404Search in Google Scholar

Carsey, Thomas M., and Gerald C. Wright. 1998. “State and National Factors in Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (3): 1008–1011.10.2307/2991740Search in Google Scholar

Castleton Polling Institute. 2014. “WCAX News 2014 Election Poll.” Available at http://www.castleton.edu/about-castleton/the-castleton-polling-institute/poll-results/vermont-election-poll-2014/ (February 12, 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, Jeffrey E. 2007. “The Polls: Presidential Referendum Effects in the 2006 Midterm Elections.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 37 (3): 545–557.10.1111/j.1741-5705.2007.02611.xSearch in Google Scholar

Engstrom, Erik J., and Samuel Kernell. 2014. Party Ballots, Reform, and the Transformation of America’s Electoral System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107279452Search in Google Scholar

Enten, Harry. 2014. “Despite A Strange Poll, Scott Walker’s Still the Favorite to Win in Wisconsin.” FiveThirtyEight. Available at https://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/poll-wisconsin-scott-walker-re-election/.Search in Google Scholar

Erikson, Robert S. 1988. “The Puzzle of Midterm Loss.” Journal of Politics 50 (4): 1011–1029.10.2307/2131389Search in Google Scholar

Erikson, Robert S. 2002. “Explaining National Party Tides in Senate Elections: Macropartisanship, Policy Mood, and Ideological Balancing.” In U.S. Senate Exceptionalism, edited by Bruce I. Oppenheimer. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.Search in Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P., Samuel J. Abrams, and Jeremy C. Pope. 2010. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. 3rd ed. Harlow: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Green, Donald P., and Jonathan S. Krasno. 1990. “Rebuttal to Jacobson’s ‘New Evidence for Old Arguments.’” American Journal of Political Science 34 (2): 363–372.10.2307/2111451Search in Google Scholar

Greenberg, Stanley B. 2004. The Two Americas: Our Current Political Deadlock and How to Break It. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Search in Google Scholar

Grunge. 2014. “Oregon Governor: Kitzhaber 48%, Richardson 38%.” Grunge. Available at https://presidentialpolls.com/carriere/oregon-governor-kitzhaber-48-richardson-38/.Search in Google Scholar

Hinckley, Barbara. 1967. “Interpreting House Midterm Elections: Toward a Measurement of the In-Party’s ‘Expected’ Loss of Seats.” American Political Science Review 61: 694–700.10.2307/1976088Search in Google Scholar

Hopkins, Dan. 2014. “All Politics Is Presidential.” FiveThirtyEight. Available at http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/all-politics-is-presidential/.Search in Google Scholar

Jackson, Robert A. 1993. “Voter Mobilization in the 1986 Midterm Election.” Journal of Politics 55: 1081–1099.10.2307/2131949Search in Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary. 1980. Money in Congressional Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary. 1990. “The Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections: New Evidence for Old Arguments.” American Journal of Political Science 34 (2): 334–362.10.2307/2111450Search in Google Scholar

Jacobson, C. Gary. 2003. “Terror, Terrain, and Turnout: Explaining the 2002 Midterm Elections.” Political Science Quarterly 118: 1–22.10.1002/j.1538-165X.2003.tb00384.xSearch in Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 2005. “Polarized Politics and the 2004 Congressional and Presidential Elections.” Political Science Quarterly 120 (2): 199–218.10.1002/j.1538-165X.2005.tb00544.xSearch in Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary. 2013. “Partisan Polarization in American Politics: A Background Paper.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 43: 688–708.10.1111/psq.12062Search in Google Scholar

Leip, Dave. 1994–2014. Dave Leip’s Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections. Available at http://www.uselectionatlas.org (June 3, 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Levonson, Michael. 2014. “Patrick’s legacy shows dents.” Boston Globe. Available at https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2014/10/16/patrick-legacy-shows-dents-coakley-baker-tied/ZwgBK3ej2l4sicp6Q2LjKN/story.html.Search in Google Scholar

Marquette University Law School. 2014. “Marquette Law School Poll.” Available at https://law.marquette.edu/poll/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/MLSP27ToplinesLV.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Mebane, Walter. 2000. “Coordination, Moderation, and Institutional Balancing in American Presidential and House Elections.” American Political Science Review 94 (March): 37–57.10.2307/2586379Search in Google Scholar

Mebane, Walter, and Jasjeet S. Sekhon. 2002. “Coordination and Policy Moderation at Midterm.” American Political Science Review 96 (March): 141–157.10.1017/S0003055402004288Search in Google Scholar

Morehouse, Sarah McCally. 1981. State Politics, Parties, and Policy. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Morris, Joseph M. 2014. “Race for Governor of Pennsylvania and the Use of Force Against ISIS.” The Mercyhurst Center for Applied Politics at Mercyhurst University (February 12, 2017).Search in Google Scholar

National Institute on Money in State Politics. 1994–2014. “State Overviews.” Available at http://www.followthemoney.org/ (June 30, 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Partin, Randall W. 2002. “Assessing the Impact of Campaign Spending in Governor’s Races.” Political Research Quarterly 30: 213–233.Search in Google Scholar

Patterson, Samuel C. 1982. “Campaign Spending in Contests for Governor.” Western Political Quarterly 35: 457–477.10.1177/106591298203500401Search in Google Scholar

Patterson, Samuel C., and Gregory A. Caldeira. 1983. “Getting Out the Vote: Participation in Gubernatorial Elections.” American Political Science Review 77: 675–689.10.2307/1957267Search in Google Scholar

Piereson, James E. 1975. “Presidential Popularity and Midterm Voting at Different Electoral Levels.” American Journal of Political Science 19: 683–694.10.2307/2110721Search in Google Scholar

Public Policy Polling. 2014. “2014 Archive.” Available at http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2014-archive.html (June 18, 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Robertson, Nigel. 2014. “WYFF4 Conducts Palmetto Politics Poll.” WYFF. Available at http://www.wyff4.com/article/wyff4-conducts-palmetto-politics-poll/7009928.Search in Google Scholar

Sabato, Larry. 1983. Goodbye to Good-time Charlie: The American Governorship Transformed. 2nd ed. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press.Search in Google Scholar

Siena Research Institute. 2016. “Governor Approval Ratings Trends.” Siena College. Available at https://www.siena.edu/centers-institutes/siena-research-institute/political-polls/governors-approval-ratings-trends/ (February 12, 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Simon, Dennis M. 1989. “Presidents, Governors, and Electoral Accountability.” Journal of Politics 51: 286–304.10.2307/2131342Search in Google Scholar

Simon, M. Dennis, Charles W. Ostrom Jr., and Robin F. Marra. 1991. “The President, Referendum Voting, and Subnational Elections in the United States.” The American Political Science Review 85 (4): 1177–1192.10.2307/1963941Search in Google Scholar

Star Advertiser. 2014. “Hawai’i Poll.” Star-Advertiser/Hawaii News Now. Available at http://hine.ws/specials/news/hipoll_jul2014_gov.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

“50 State Tracking Polls.” 2006. Survey USA. Available at http://www.surveyusa.com/50StateTracking.html (June 8, 2016).Search in Google Scholar

SurveyUSA. 2006. “Polls.” Available at http://www.surveyusa.com/PollHistory.aspx?d=2006 (June 18, 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Tompkins, Mark E. 1988. “Have Gubernatorial Elections Become More Distinctive Contests?” The Journal of Politics 50 (1): 192–205.10.2307/2131048Search in Google Scholar

Topaz, Jonathan. 2014. “Calif. Poll: Obama Sinks to Record Low.” Politico. Available at http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/poll-obama-california-approval-rating-110507.Search in Google Scholar

Tufte, Edward R. 1975. “Determinants of the Outcomes of Midterm Congressional Election.” American Political Science Review 69: 812–826.10.2307/1958391Search in Google Scholar

U.S. Department of Labor. 2016. “Bureau of Labor Statistics.” Available at http://bls.gov/ (June 18, 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Vanderbilt University. 2014. “Vanderbilt University Fall 2014 Poll.” Available at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/csdi/November2014VUPollQuestionnaire.pdf (February 12, 2017).Search in Google Scholar

YouGov. 2014. “Battleground Tracker 2014: National Attitudes.” YouGov. Available at https://today.yougov.com/news/2014/09/07/battleground-tracker-2014-national-attitudes/#/Wave3StatebyState.Search in Google Scholar

Yuan, Y. C. 2000. “Multiple Imputation for Missing Data: Concepts and New Development.” In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual SAS Users Group International Conference (Paper No. 267). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-08-30

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/for-2018-0013/html
Scroll to top button