India-ASEAN Trade in Intermediates and Final Products: A Study of Selected Sectors

Deeparghya Mukherjee 1
  • 1 Institute of South Asian Studies, National University of Singapore, 29 Heng Mui Keng Terrace, #08-06 (Block B), Singapore 119620, Singapore
Deeparghya Mukherjee

Abstract

The architecture of international trade is increasingly changing towards trade in value added from trade in final products. In this light, studying the differential trends of exports and imports of intermediates and final products between trading nations becomes important. This paper attempts to study the pattern of trade between India and the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) (a vibrant region trading through value chains), and investigates the effects of India’s functional Free Trade agreements (FTAs) in the region with ASEAN, Singapore and Malaysia- segmented by intermediates and final products. Our analysis is further focused on five sectors which are significant in India’s trade basket and stand out in terms of organising production into value chains spanning across countries, primarily from the ASEAN region. These are: fishing, textiles and wearing apparel, transport equipment, recycling and financial intermediation & business services. We find and present evidence to show increased trade of intermediates between India and ASEAN countries like Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines and Viet Nam. The trade expansion effects have been far stronger for intermediates trade implying India’s greater participation in the regional value chains. However, India’s exports for final demand are yet to see significant increases.

  • Ahmed, S. 2010. “India-ASEAN Free Trade Agreement: A Sectoral Analysis.” SSRN Working Paper 1698849.

  • Cabalu, H., and C. Alfonso. 2007. “Does AFTA Create or Divert Trade?” Global Economy Journal 7 (4):1–18.

  • Chand, S., and K. Sen. 2002. “Trade Liberalization and Productivity Growth: Evidence From Indian Manufacturing.” Review of Development Economics 6 (1):120–32.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Francois, J. (2005). “Preferential Trade Arrangements and the Pattern of Production and Trade when Inputs are Differentiated.” Centre for Economic Policy Research.DP5144.

  • Francois, J., and G. Wignaraja. 2008. “Economic Implications of Asian Integration.” Global Economy Journal 8 (3):1–48.

  • Goldberg, P., A. Khandelwal, N. Pavcnik, and P. Topalova. 2008. “Imported Intermediate Inputs and Domestic Product Growth: Evidence From India.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 125 (4):1727–67.

  • Hamanaka, S. 2012. “Trends of Trade Interdependence and Proliferation of FTAs in Asia: 1980–2010.” Global Economy Journal 12 (2):1–21.

  • Karmakar, S. 2005. India-ASEAN Cooperation in Services- An Overview. ICRIER Working Paper No. 176. New Delhi: Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations.

  • Kawai, M., and G. Wignaraja. 2007. “ASEAN + 3 or ASEAN + 6: Which way forward?” Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute Discussion Paper No. 77.

  • Kazunobu, H., and N. Yamashita. 2011. The Role of Preferential Trade Agreements(PTAs) in Facilitating Global Production Networks. Chiba, Japan: Institute of Developing Economies Discussion Paper No. 280.

  • Lee, H., and V. Liew. 2007. “India-ASEAN-5 Economic Integration: Impact of Liberalisation.” IUP Journal of Applied Economics VI (6):7–20.

  • Lenzen, M., K. Kanemoto, D. Moran, and A. Geschke. 2012. “Mapping the Structure of the World Economy.” Env. Sci. Tech 46 (15):8374–81.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Lenzen, M., D. Moran, K. Kanemoto, and A. Geschke. 2013. “Building Eora: A Global Multi-Regional Input-Output Database at High Country and Sector Resolution.” Economic Systems Research 25 (1):20–49.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Marjit, S. 1987. “Trade in Intermediates and the Colonial Pattern of Trade.” Economica 54 (214):173–84.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Mayer, T., and S. Zignago. 2011. “Notes on CEPII’s Distances Measures: The GeoDist Database.” CEPII Working Paper 2011–25.

  • Miroudot, S., D. Rouzet, and F. Spinelli. 2013. Trade Policy Implications of Global Value Chains: Case Studies. OECD Trade policy Papers, No. 161. OECD Publishing.

  • Pal, P., and M. Dasgupta. 2008. “Does a Free Trade Agreement with ASEAN Make Sense? “ Economic & Political Weekly XLIII (46):8–12.

  • Ramkrishnan, A., and P. Varma. 2014. “Do Free Trade Agreements Promote Intra-Industry Trade? the Case of India and Its FTAs.” International Journal of Trade and Global Markets 7 (2):129–44.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Sikdar, C., and B. Nag. 2011. “Impact of India-ASEAN Free Trade Agreement: A Cross-Country Analysis using Applied General Equilbrium Modelling.” Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade Working Paper Series, No. 107.

  • Soloaga, I., and A. Winters. 2001. “Regionalism in the Nineties: What Effect on Trade?” North American Journal of Economics and Finance 12 (1):1–29.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Tewari, M., and C. Veeramani. 2016. “Network Trade and Development: What Do Patterns of Vertically Specialised Trade in ASEAN Tell Us About India’s Place in Asian Production Networks? “ Global Economy Journal 16 (2):349–388.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Veeramani, C., and G. Saini. 2010. Impact of ASEAN-India FTA on India’s Plantation Commodities: A Simulation Analysis. Mumbai: IGIDR Working Paper 2010–004, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research.

  • Wignaraja, G. 2014. “Assessing the Experience of South Asia-East Asia Integration and India’s Role.” ADBI Working Paper Series No. 465.

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


or
Log in with your institution

Journal + Issues

Search