degruyter.com uses cookies to store information that enables us to optimize our website and make browsing more comfortable for you. To learn more about the use of cookies, please read our Privacy Policy. OK

Access-to-Justice Reforms: A Brazilian Case Study of Bank Litigation Related to Heterodox Economic Plans

  • 1 Brazilian Supreme Court, Justice Ricardo Lewandowski’s Office, Brasília, Brazil
Helena C. RefoscoORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9973-3682

Abstract

Between 2003 and 2016, Brazil carried out a World Bank-inspired “rule-of-law” reform that has failed to substantially increase access to justice. To buttress such a disheartening conclusion, this paper includes a case study of Brazil’s biggest litigation ever, which centered on the losses that bank customers had incurred because of heterodox national economic plans implemented in the late 1980s and early 1990s. By showing that the system of binding precedents consolidated in the reform ended up favoring “repeat players” over “one-shotters” in this litigation, this paper seeks to explain how institutional reforms that fail to tackle deep inequalities may backfire.

  • Bar-Gill, O., and E. Warren. 2008. “Making Credit Safer.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 157: 1.

  • Carvalho, C. E. 2006. “As origens e a gênese do Plano Collor.” Nova Economia 16 (1): 101–34, https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-63512006000100003.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Carvalho, C. E. 2012. “O Banco Central Como Emprestador de Última Instância: Mão Quase Invisível Ao Sustentar Os Mercados.” Revista Oikos 11 (2): 217–39.

  • Conselho Nacional de Justiça. 2011. Panorama de Acesso à Justiça No Brasil, 2004 a 2009. Brasília: CNJ. http://www.cnj.jus.br/images/pesquisas-judiciarias/Publicacoes/relat_panorama_acesso_pnad2009.pdf.

  • Conselho Nacional de Justiça. 2012. “100 Maiores Litigantes (2011).” http://www.cnj.jus.br/images/pesquisas-judiciarias/Publicacoes/100_maiores_litigantes.pdf.

  • Cypher, J. M., and J. L. Dietz. 2014. The Process of Economic Development, 4th ed. London; New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

  • da Silva, V. A. 2019. The Constitution of Brazil: A Contextual Analysis. Oxford, UK: Constitutional Systems of the World.

  • Dakolias, M. 1996. The Judicial Sector in Latin America and the Caribbean: Elements of Reform. World Bank Technical Note 319. Washington DC: World Bank.

  • Desan, C. 2016. “Money as a Legal Institution.” In Money in the Western Legal Tradition, edited by D. Fox, and W. Ernst, 18–36: Oxford University Press.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Ferrari-Filho, F., and L. F. De Paula. 2003. “The Legacy of the Real Plan and an Alternative Agenda for the Brazilian Economy.” Investigación Económica 62 (44).

  • Gabbay, D. M., M. C. de Araujo Asperti, S. H. da Costa, and P. Alves da Silva. 2019. “Why Do the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead in Brazil? Revisiting Speculations Concerning Repeat Players and One-Shotters in the Brazilian Litigation Setting.” Revista de Direito Público 16 (88).

  • Galanter, M. 1974. “Why the ‘Haves’ Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law & Society Review 9 (1), https://doi.org/10.2307/3053023.

  • Gidi, A. 2003. “Class Actions in Brazil – A Model for Civil Law Countries.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 51 (2), https://doi.org/10.2307/3649151.

  • Kennedy, D. 2011. “Some Caution about Property Rights as a Recipe for Economic Development.” Accounting, Economics, and Law 1 (1), https://doi.org/10.2202/2152-2820.1006.

  • Lewandowski, E. R. 2020. A Possibilidade de Homologação de Acordo Coletivo Em Ação Constitucional de Cunho Objetivo. (forthcoming): Instituto dos Advogados de São Paulo.

  • Lopes, J. R. L. 2006. “Brazilian Courts and Social Rights: A Case Study Revisited.” In Courts and Social Transformation in New Democracies: An Institutional Voice for the Poor?, edited by R. Gargarella, P. Domingo, and T. Roux. Aldershot, Hampshire, England: Ashgate.

  • Lothian, T. 1996. “Women’s Rights and Political Economy.” Conn. J. Int’l L. 12: 67.

  • Mattei, U. 2007. “Access to Justice. A Renewed Global Issue.” Electronic Journal of Comparative Law 11.

  • O’Donnell, G. A. 2004. “Why the Rule of Law Matters.” Journal of Democracy 15 (4): 32–46, https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2004.0076.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Portugal Gouvêa, C. 2008. Equity Cost Analysis: A Contribution to Institutional Theory in Face of Increasing Global Inequalities. S.J.D. Dissertation. United States: Harvard University.

  • Portugal Gouvêa, C., and H. C. Refosco. 2020. “Class Action in Brazil: Overview, Current Trends and Case Studies.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Class Actions, edited by B. Fitzpatrick, and R. Thomas. Vol. (forthcoming). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Refosco, H. C. 2018. Ação Coletiva e Democratização Do Acesso à Justiça. São Paulo: Quartier Latin.

  • Refosco, H. C. 2020. Law, Development and Access to Education: A Brazilian Case Study of Class Actions: Columbia Human Rights Law Review (forthcoming).

  • Rodovalho, M. F. de T. 2014. A Reforma do Poder Judiciário: Análise do Papel do STF e do CNJ. São Paulo: Atlas.

  • Sadek, M. T. 2014. “Acesso à Justiça: Um Direito e Seus Obstáculos.” Revista USP, no. 101 (May): 55–66, https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9036.v0i101p55-66.

  • Sadek, M. T., J. R. S. Costa, and S. L. Junkes, 2015. In O Uso Da Justiça e o Litígio No Brasil, edited by M. T. Sadek et al. Brazil: Associação dos Magistrados Brasileiros (AMB).

  • Salama, B. M. 2016. “Crédito Bancário e Judiciário: Condutores Institucionais Da Superlitigância.” In O Judiciário e o Estado Regulador Brasileiro, edited by M. M. Prado, 103–33. São Paulo: Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getúlio Vargas.

  • Salles, C. A. de. 2014. “Class Actions: Algumas Premissas Para Comparação.” In Processo Coletivo: Do Surgimento à Atualidade, edited by A. P. Grinover, A. H. Benjamin, T. A. Alvim, and V. Vigoriti. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais.

  • Santos, A. 2011. “The World Bank’s Uses of the ‘Rule of Law’ Promise in Economic Development.” In The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal, edited by D. M Trubek, and A. Santos. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • United Nations. 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/Res/70/1. New York: United Nations.

  • Veiga da Rocha, J. P. 2004. A Capacidade Normativa de Conjuntura no Direito Econômico: o Déficit Democrático da Regulação Financeira. Ph.D. Dissertation. Brazil: University of São Paulo (USP).

  • Veiga da Rocha, J. P. 2015. “Quem Tem Medo Da Delegação Legislativa?” Revista de Direito Administrativo 271: 193–221, https://doi.org/10.12660/rda.v271.2016.60765.

  • Vieira, O. V. 2015. “Inequality and the Subversion of the Rule of Law.” In Law and Society in Latin America: A New Map (Law, Development and Globalization), Vol. 4, edited by C. Rodríguez-Garavito, 23–42. New York: Routledge.

  • World Bank. 2002. Reforming Courts: The Role of Empirical Research.https://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTLAWJUSTINST/0,contentMDK:20813070∼pagePK:210058∼piPK:210062∼theSitePK:1974062,00.html#PREM_Notes.

  • World Bank. 2012. Performance Measures Topic Brief. 2012. http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTLAWJUSTINST/0,contentMDK:20756997∼menuPK:1990189∼pagePK:210058∼piPK:210062∼theSitePK:1974062∼isCURL:Y,00.html.

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
$42.00
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


or
Log in with your institution

Journal + Issues

Global Jurist offers a forum for scholarly cyber-debate on issues of comparative law, law and economics, international law, law and development, and legal anthropology. Edited by an international board of leading comparative law scholars from all the continents, Global Jurist is mindful of globalization and respectful of cultural differences.

Search