Technology for Behavior Change – Potential, Challenges, and Ethical Questions

An Interdisciplinary Experts Discussion

Sarah Diefenbach 1 , Andreas Kapsner 1 , Matthias Laschke 2 , Jasmin Niess 1 ,  and Daniel Ullrich 1
  • 1 Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
  • 2 Folkwang University of the Arts, Essen, Germany
Sarah Diefenbach
  • Corresponding author
  • Email
  • Further information
  • Sarah Diefenbach is professor for market and consumer psychology at the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich. Her research focuses on the design and evaluation of interactive technology with a special attention to emotional experience and psychological needs.
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar
, Andreas Kapsner
  • Email
  • Further information
  • Andreas Kapsner’s work in philosophy spans the field from theoretical to practical philosophy. He holds a PhD in cognitive science and works at the psychology department of the LMU Munich. Also, he is co-founder of nifu.tv, a collective of interactive media artists and scientists dedicated to the joint exploration of complex ideas (www.nifu.tv).
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar
, Matthias Laschke
  • Email
  • Further information
  • Matthias Laschke is a postdoctoral researcher in Prof. Dr. Marc Hassenzahl’s workgroup at Folkwang University of the Arts, Germany. He focuses on the design and aesthetics of transformational objects (“pleasurable troublemakers”) and persuasive technologies addressing diverse topics such as sustainability, procrastination, willpower, adherence, and driver concentration in traffic.
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar
, Jasmin Niess
  • Email
  • Further information
  • Jasmin Niess is a researcher in Prof. Dr. Sarah Diefenbach’s workgroup at Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany. Her research focuses on interactive technologies for self-improvement, in particular on the implementation of psychological knowledge within these products, in order to improve the User’s Experience.
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar
and Daniel Ullrich
  • Email
  • Further information
  • Daniel UIllrich is researcher in the institute of informatics at Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich. His research focuses on the interaction with and influence of robots in the field of human-robot-interaction, in particular robot personality and application of social psychological mechanisms.
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1]

    Gigerenzer, G., Hertwig, R., & Pachur, T. (2011). Heuristics: The foundations of adaptive behavior. Oxford University Press, Inc.

  • [2]

    Kapsner, A., & Sandfuchs, B. (2015). Nudging as a threat to privacy. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6(3), 455–468.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • [3]

    Laschke, M., Diefenbach, S., & Hassenzahl, M. (2015). “Annoying, but in a nice way”: An inquiry into the experience of frictional feedback. International Journal of Design, 9(2), 129–140.

  • [4]

    Laschke, M., Diefenbach, S., Schneider, T. & Hassenzahl, M. (2014). Keymoment: Initiating Behavior Change through Friendly Friction. In Proceedings of the NordiCHI 2014 Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 853–858). New York: ACM Press.

  • [5]

    Morozov, E. (2013). To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. Philadelphia, PA: Publicaffairs.

  • [6]

    Niess, J. & Diefenbach, S. (2016). Communication Styles of Interactive Tools for Self-Improvement. Psychology of Well-being, 6(3), 1–15.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • [7]

    Nisbett, R. E. (2015). Mindware: Tools for Smart Thinking. Macmillan.

  • [8]

    Sunstein, C. (2013). The storrs lectures: behavioral economics and paternalism. Yale Law Journal 122, 1826–1899.

  • [9]

    Stibe, A. (2016). Persuasive Cities: Health Behavior Change at Scale. In A. Meschtscherjakov, B. De Ruyter, V. Fuchsberger, M. Murer & M. Tscheligi (Eds.). Persuasive Technology 2016 Adjunct Proceedings (pp. 42–45). Salzburg: Center for Human-Computer Interaction, University of Salzburg.

  • [10]

    Thaler, R., and C. Sunstein (2008). Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • [11]

    Tromp, N., Hekkert, P., & Verbeek, P. P. (2011). Design for socially responsible behavior: a classification of influence based on intended user experience. Design Issues, 27(3), 3–19.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • [12]

    Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.

  • [13]

    Ullrich, D., Diefenbach, S., & Butz, A. (2016). Murphy Miserable Robot: A Companion to Support Children’s Well-being in Emotionally Difficult Situations. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3234–3240). ACM.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
$42.00
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


or
Log in with your institution

Journal + Issues

i-com - Journal of Interactive Media is devoted to human-computer interaction, media design, usability, engineering and systems evaluation, software ergonomics, cooperative systems, e-learning, mobile and ubiquitous systems, user-adaptive systems, agent development tools and methods for media in different application fields, barrier-free systems design, and the social aspects of information and communication technologies.

Search