Nitrous oxide for analgesia in external cephalic version at term: prospective comparative study

Jorge Burgos, Patricia Cobos 1 , Carmen Osuna 1 , María de Mar Centeno 1 , Luis Fernández-Llebrez, Txanton Martinez Astorquiza, and Juan Carlos Melchor
  • 1 Obstetrics and Gynecology Service, BioCruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Biscay, Spain
  • 2 School of Medicine, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Biscay, Spain
Jorge Burgos, Patricia Cobos, Carmen Osuna, María de Mar Centeno, Luis Fernández-Llebrez, Txanton Martinez Astorquiza and Juan Carlos Melchor

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to analyze the effect of using inhaled nitrous oxide (N2O) for analgesia in external cephalic version (ECV) at term on the success rate of the procedure, on pain, and on obstetric and perinatal outcomes.

Methods: A prospective comparative cohort study among 300 women with singleton pregnancy in breech presentation at term undergoing an ECV with inhaled N2O in a 50:50 mix with oxygen for analgesia and 150 ECVs with no analgesia.

Results: The success rate was 52.3% in the N2O cohort and 52.7% in the controls (P=0.94), whereas the median level of pain was statistically lower in women given N2O (median, 6; range, 4–7, vs. median, 7; range, 5–8; P<0.01). This improvement is mainly from a 49% decrease in severe pain. There were no significant differences in the rate of complications associated with the ECV, in the rate of cesarean sections, or in perinatal outcomes. Furthermore, there were no severe complications secondary to N2O inhalation.

Conclusions: N2O inhalation at a concentration of 50% for analgesia during ECV decreases the level of severe pain experienced by women, appears to be safe both for mother and child, and has no influence on the success rate of ECV or the perinatal outcomes.

  • [1]

    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. External cephalic version. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 13. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:1–7.

  • [2]

    Ben-Arie A, Kogan S, Schachter M, Hagay ZJ, Insler V. The impact of external cephalic version on the rate of vaginal and cesarean breech deliveries: a 3-year cumulative experience. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1995;63:125–9.

    • Crossref
  • [3]

    Burgos J, Melchor JC, Cobos P, Centeno M, Pijoan JI, Fernandez-Llebrez L, et al. Does fetal weight estimated by ultrasound really affect the success rate of external cephalic version? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88:1101–6.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
  • [4]

    Burgos J, Melchor JC, Cobos P, Eguiguren N, Centeno MM, Fernández-Llebrez L, et al. Análisis del dolor en la versión cefálica externa. Prog Obstet Ginecol. 2009;52:557–61.

    • Crossref
  • [5]

    Burgos J, Cobos P, Melchor JC, Osuna C, Rodriguez L, Fernández-Llebrez L, et al. External cephalic version: a review of the evidence. Curr Women’s Health Rev. 2011;7.

    • Crossref
  • [6]

    Burgos J, Eguiguren N, Quintana E, Cobos P, Del Mar Centeno M, Larrieta R, et al. Atosiban vs. ritodrine as a tocolytic in external cephalic version at term: a prospective cohort study. J Perinat Med. 2010;38:23–8.

  • [7]

    Burgos J, Melchor JC, Pijoán JI, Cobos P, Fernández-Llebrez L, Martínez-Astorquiza T. A prospective study of the factors associated with the success rate of external cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;112:48–51.

    • Crossref
  • [8]

    Chow E, Doyle M, Li K, Bradley N, Harris K, Hruby G, et al. Mild, moderate, or severe pain categorization by patients with cancer with bone metastases. J Palliat Med. 2007;10:1338–46.

    • PubMed
  • [9]

    Delisle MF, Kamani A, Douglas J, Bebbington M. Antepartum external cephalic version under spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:S115.

    • Crossref
  • [10]

    Fok WY, Chan LW, Leung TY, Lau TK. Maternal experience of pain during external cephalic version at term. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84:748–51.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
  • [11]

    Hannah ME, Whyte H, Hannah WJ, Hewson S, Amankwah K, Cheng M, et al. Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:917–27.

  • [12]

    Hofmeyr GJ. Interventions to help external cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2:CD000184.

    • Crossref
  • [13]

    Irestedt L. Current status of nitrous oxide for obstetric pain relief. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1994;38:771–2.

    • Crossref
  • [14]

    Kaufman E, Chastain DC, Gaughan AM, Gracely RH. Staircase assessment of the magnitude and time-course of 50% nitrous-oxide analgesia. J Dent Res. 1992;71:1598–603.

    • Crossref
  • [15]

    Kok M, Cnossen J, Gravendeel L, van der Post J, Opmeer B, Mol BW. Clinical factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:630.e1–7.

    • Crossref
  • [16]

    Kok M, Van Der Steeg JW, Mol BW, Opmeer B, Van Der Post JA. Which factors play a role in clinical decision-making in external cephalic version? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87:31–5.

    • Crossref
  • [17]

    Leung TY, Sahota DS, Chan LW, Fok WY, Law LW, Lau TK. Variation of force applied during external cephalic version with different patients’ characteristic and outcome of version. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85:182–7.

    • Crossref
  • [18]

    Leung TY, Sahota DS, Fok WY, Chan LW, Lau TK. Quantification of contact surface pressure exerted during external cephalic version. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82:1017–22.

    • Crossref
  • [19]

    Macarthur AJ, Gagnon S, Tureanu LM, Downey KN. Anesthesia facilitation of external cephalic version: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:1219–24.

    • Crossref
  • [20]

    Royal College Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. External cephalic version and reducing the incidence of breech presentation. RCOG guidelines. 2006. Available from: http://www.rcog.org.uk. Accessed on September 23, 2012.

  • [21]

    Rosen MA. Nitrous oxide for relief of labor pain: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:S110–26.

    • Crossref
  • [22]

    Schorr SJ, Speights SE, Ross EL, Bofill JA, Rust OA, Norman PF, et al. A randomized trial of epidural anesthesia to improve external cephalic version success. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:1133–7.

    • Crossref
  • [23]

    Sociedad Española de Obstetricia y Ginecología. Versión externa en presentación de nalgas. Protocolos SEGO. 2001. Available from: http://www.sego.es/. Accessed on September 30, 2012.

  • [24]

    Sociedad Española de Obstetricia y Ginecología. Parto en la presentación de nalgas a término. Protocolos SEGO. 2011. Available from: http://www.sego.es/. Accessed on February 4, 2012.

  • [25]

    Sullivan JT, Grobman WA, Bauchat JR, Scavone BM, Grouper S, McCarthy RJ, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the effect of combined spinal-epidural analgesia on the success of external cephalic version for breech presentation. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009;18:328–34.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
  • [26]

    Weiniger CF, Ginosar Y, Elchalal U, Sharon E, Nokrian M, Ezra Y. External cephalic version for breech presentation with or without spinal analgesia in nulliparous women at term: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:1343–50.

    • Crossref
  • [27]

    Weiniger CF, Ginosar Y, Elchalal U, Sela HY, Weissman C, Ezra Y. Randomized controlled trial of external cephalic version in term multiparae with or without spinal analgesia. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104:613–8.

    • PubMed
Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
$42.00
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


or
Log in with your institution

Journal + Issues

Search