The Sound of Drivel

Interpreters and the Manipulation of Style in the Legal Discourse

Jessica Pérez-Luzardo Díaz 1  and Víctor González-Ruiz 2
  • 1 Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
  • 2 Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
Jessica Pérez-Luzardo Díaz and Víctor González-Ruiz

Abstract

This paper describes an experiment dealing with the manipulation of style in consecutive interpreting in the context of the law. In it, several groups of Spanish law undergraduates assessed two performances by a consecutive interpreter. The interpreter in both performances translated a German-language lecture on constitutional law into Spanish, the only difference between the two renditions being the style used in the target language: in one of them, plain language; in the other, a style reminiscent of complex traditional legal drafting. The results of this study are presented and discussed in this paper, which combines the issue of plain language in legal translation and interpreting, with the concept of style as a quality parameter in interpreting. These results, which suggest that even the most junior law students have a liking for conventional elaborate drafting, should serve as elements of reflection for trainers of both legal professionals and interpreters.

  • Adams, Matthew (2005): Plain English: the cure against translating infectious legal-speak. ATA Chronicle 34(9): 28–29.

  • Adler, Mark (2006): Clarity for lawyers: Effective legal writing. 2nd ed. London: The Law Society.

  • Alcaraz Varó, Enrique, and Brian Hughes (2002): Legal translation explained. Manchester: St. Jerome.

  • Altman, Janet (1994): Error analysis in the teaching of simultaneous interpreting: A Pilot Study. In Bridging the gap: Empirical research in simultaneous interpretation, ed. Sylvie Lambert, and Barbara Moser-Mercer, 25–38. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Asprey, Michelle M. (2010): Plain language for lawyers. 4th rev. ed. Annandale, Australia: The Federation Press.

  • Berk-Seligson, Susan (1988): The impact of politeness in witness testimony: The influence of court interpreter. Multilingua 7(4): 411–439.

  • Bhatia, Vijay K. (1997): Translating legal genres. In Text typology and translation, ed. Anna Trosborg, 203–214. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Briz Gómez, Antonio, dir. (2011): Estudio de campo : Lenguaje oral (Comisión para la Modernización del Lenguaje Jurídico). Madrid: Ministerio de Justicia del Gobierno de España.

  • Bühler, Hildegund (1986): Linguistic (semantic) and extra-linguistic (pragmatic) criteria for the evaluation of conference interpretation and interpreters. Multilingua 5(4): 231–235.

  • Bundesministerium der Justiz (2008): Handbuch der Rechtsförmlichkeit. 3rd ed. http://hdr.bmj.de. Accessed 6 April 2015.

  • Burukina, Olga (2012): Legal translation: principles of success. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice 4(1): 570–590.

  • Butt, Peter, and Richard Castle (2006): Modern legal drafting . A guide to using clearer language. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Carretero González, Cristina, dir. (2011): Estudio de campo : Políticas públicas comparadas (Comisión para la Modernización del Lenguaje Jurídico). Madrid: Ministerio de Justicia del Gobierno de España.

  • Cheek, Annetta (2010): Defining plain language. Clarity. Journal of the International Association Promoting Plain Legal Language 64: 5­–15.

  • Collados Aís, Ángela (1998): La evaluación de la calidad en interpretación simultánea. La importancia de la comunicación no verbal. Granada: Comares.

  • Collados Aís, Ángela, E. Macarena Pradas Macías, Elisabeth Stévaux, and Olalla García Becerra (eds.) (2007): La evaluación de la calidad en interpretación simultánea: parámetros de incidencia. Granada: Comares.

  • Collados Aís, Ángela, Emilia Iglesias Fernández, E. Macarena Pradas Macías, and Elisabeth Stévaux, eds. (2011): Qualitätsparameter beim Simultandolmetschen. Tübingen: Narr Verlag.

  • Conde Antequera, Jesús (2009): Lenguaje administrativo y derecho: El lenguaje como aspecto de la actividad administrativa. Propuestas para un uso eficaz del lenguaje administrativo por el personal de las Administraciones Públicas. Navarra: Aranzadi/Thomson Reuters.

  • Déjean le Féal, Karla (1990): Some thoughts on the evaluation of simultaneous interpretation. In Interpreting: yesterday, today, and tomorrow, ed. David Bowen, and Margareta Bowen, 154–160. Binghampton, NY: SUNY.

  • Eichhoff-Cyrus, Karin M., and Gerd Antos (eds.) (2008): Verständlichkeit als Bürgerrecht? Die Rechts- und Verwaltungssprache in der öffentlichen Diskussion [Thema Deutsch 9]. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.

  • Engberg, Jan (2013): Legal linguistics as a mutual arena for cooperation. Recent developments in the field of applied linguistics and law. AILA Review 26. doi 10.1075/aila.26.03eng.

  • Fluck, Hans-R. (2008): Verwaltungssprache unter dem Einfluss der Gesetzessprache. In Verständlichkeit als Bürgerrecht. Die Rechts- und Verwaltungsprache in der öffentlichen Diskussion, ed. Karin M. Eichhoff-Cyrus, and Gerd Antos, 117–135. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.

  • García de la Concha, Víctor et al. (2011): Informe de la Comisión de Modernización del Lenguaje Jurídico. Madrid: Ministerio de Justicia del Gobierno de España.

  • Garner, Bryan A. (2001): Legal writing in plain English. A Text with exercises. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Garzone, Giuliana (2003): Reliability of quality criteria evaluation in survey research. In La evaluación de la calidad en interpretación: investigación, ed. Ángela Collados Aís, M. Manuela Fernández Sánchez, and Daniel Gile, 23–30. Granada: Comares.

  • Gibbons, John (2001): Revising the language of New South Wales police procedure: Applied linguistics in action. Applied Linguistics 22/4: 439‒469.

  • Gile, Daniel (1983): Des difficultés de langue en interprétation simultanée. Traduire 117: 2–8.

  • Gile, Daniel (1990): L’évaluation de la qualité de l’interprétation par les délégués: une étude de cas. The Interpreters’ Newsletter 3: 66–71.

  • Gile, Daniel (1995): Fidelity assessment in consecutive interpretation: An experiment. Target 7(1): 151–164.

  • González-Ruiz, Víctor (2005): Translating the unclear: How Spanish law professionals accept plain translated texts. Folia Translatologica 9: 36–49.

  • González-Ruiz, Víctor (2013): Legal translations and plain language: The judgement of Spanish law undergraduates. Poster presented at the PLAIN 20th Anniversary conference, Vancouver, Canada, 10-13 October 2013.

  • González-Ruiz, Víctor (2014): Trying to see the wood despite the trees: A plain approach to legal translation. In The Ashgate Handbook of Legal Translation, ed. Le Cheng, King Kui Sin, and Anne Wagner, 71–88. Surrey, UK: Ashgate.

  • Hammel, Andrew A. (2008): Legal translation, the plain language movement, and English as a lingua franca. In Language and Law : Theory and Society, ed. Frances Olsen, Alexander Lorz, and Dieter Stein, 275–290. Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.

  • Hansen, Sandra, Ralph Dirksen, Martin Küchler, Kerstin Kunz, and Stella Neumann (2006): Comprehensible legal texts — Utopia or a question of wording? On processing rephrased German court decisions. Hermes – Journal of Language and Communication Studies 36: 15–40.

  • Hazelton, Cynthia (2006): Where does plain English fit in? ATA Chronicle 35(1): 36–46.

  • Herbert, Jean (1952): The interpreter’s handbook: How to become a conference interpreter. Geneva: Georg.

  • Holub, Elisabeth (2010): Does intonation matter? The impact of monotony on listener comprehension. The Interpreters’ Newsletter 15: 117–126.

  • Joseph, John E. (1995): Indeterminacy, translation and the law. In Translation and the Law (American Translators Association Scholarly Monograph Series VIII), ed. Morris Marshall, 1–36. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Kimble, Joseph (2006): Lifting the fog on legalese. Essays on plain language. Durham, North Carolina: Carolina Academic Press.

  • Kimble, Joseph (2012): Writing for dollars, writing to please. The case for plain language in business, government, and law. Durham, North Carolina: Carolina Academic Press.

  • Koskinen, Kaisa (2000): Institutional illusions. Translating in the EU Commission. The Translator 6.1: 49–65.

  • Kopczyński, Andrej (1981): Deviance in conference interpreting. In The mission of the translator today and tomorrow , ed. Andrej Kopczyński, 399–404. Warsaw: Polska Agencja Interpress.

  • Lerch, K. D. (ed.) (2004): Recht Verstehen. Verständlichkeit, Missverständlichkeit und Unverständlichkeit von Recht [Die Sprache des Rechts 1]. Berlin: De Gruyter.

  • Lötscher, A., and Markus Nussbaumer (eds.) (2007): Denken wie ein Philosoph und schreiben wie ein Bauer. Sprache, mit der ein Staat zu machen ist. Zürich: Schulthess.

  • Mason, Marianne (2008): Courtroom interpreting. Lanham: University Press of America.

  • Mellinkoff, David (1963): The language of the law. Boston/Toronto: Little, Brown and Company.

  • Mellinkoff, David (1982): Legal writing: Sense and nonsense. St. Paul, Minnesota: West.

  • Montolío Durán, Estrella, dir. (2011): Estudio de campo: Lenguaje escrito (Comisión para la Modernización del Lenguaje Jurídico). Madrid: Ministerio de Justicia del Gobierno de España.

  • Moser, Peter (1995): Simultanes Konferenzdolmetschen. Anforderungen und Erwartungen der Benutzer. Endbericht im Auftrag von AIIC. Vienna, SRZ Stadt und Regionalforschung GmbH.

  • Muhr, Rudolph (2012): Zur Bürgerfreundlichkeit und Verständlichkeit alltagsnaher sterreichischer Rechtstexte. In Sprachenpolitik und Rechtssprache, ed. Sandro Moraldo, 118–140. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.

  • Muhr, Rudolph (2013): Strategien der Reformulierung von Rechtstexten und ihr Einsatz in der Ausbildung für Übersetzer und Dolmetscher. In Sprachwissenschaft im Fokus germanistischer Forschung und Lehre, ed. Edyta Błachut, Józef Jarosz, Anna Malgorzewicz, and Roman Opilowski, 309–331. Wroclaw/Dresden: Neisse Verlag.

  • Pérez-Luzardo Díaz, Jessica (2007): La incidencia del estilo en la evaluación de la calidad. In La evaluación de la calidad en interpretación simultánea: parámetros de incidencia, ed. Ángela Collado-Aís, E. Macarena Pradas Macías, Elisabeth Stévaux, and Olalla García Becerra, 141–157. Granada: Comares.

  • Pérez-Luzardo Díaz, Jessica (2015): The style parameter in quality evaluation and expectations of simultaneous interpreting. Sendebar 26: 213–233.

  • Pérez-Luzardo Díaz, Jessica and Barranco-Droege, Rafael (2011): Stil. In Qualitätsparameter beim Simultandolmetschen, ed. Ángela Collados Aís, Emilia Iglesias Fernández, E. Macarena Pradas Macías, and Elisabeth Stévaux, 191–217. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.

  • Pérez-Luzardo Díaz, Jessica, Emilia Iglesias, Amparo Jiménez, and Mª Jesús Blasco (2005): Presentación y discusión de algunos parámetros de investigación en la evaluación de la calidad en interpretación simultánea. In Actas del II Congreso Internacional AIETI, ed. M. Luisa Romano García, 1133–1154. Madrid: Universidad Pontificia Comillas.

  • Pöchhacker, Franz (2001): Quality assessment in conference and community interpreting. Meta 46 (2): 410–425.

  • Pöchhacker, Franz (ed.) (2015): Routledge encyclopedia of interpreting studies. London/New York: Routledge.

  • Pradas Macías, Macarena (2006): Probing quality criteria in simultaneous interpreting: The role of silent pauses in fluency. Interpreting 8 (1): 25–43.

  • Prieto de Pedro, Jesús José (1991): Lenguas, lenguaje y derecho. Madrid: Cívitas.

  • Raff, Gudrun, and Margret Schiedt. 2012. Der Redaktionsstab Rechtssprache beim Bundesministerium der Justiz – Ein Situations- und Erfahrungsbericht. LeGes 2012 (1):61–74. http://goo.gl/a6fi2z. Accessed 25 March 2015.

  • Reithofer, Karin (2013): English as a lingua franca vs. interpreting: Battleground or peaceful co-existence. Interpreting 15 (1): 48–73.

  • Rennert, Sylvi (2010): The impact of fluency on the subjective assessment of interpreting quality. The Interpreters’ Newsletter 15: 101–115.

  • Šarčević, Susan (1997): New approach to legal translation. The Hague/London/Boston: Kluwer Law International.

  • Šarčević, Susan (2015): Basic principles of term formation in the multilingual and multicultural context of EU law. In Language and culture in EU law. Multidisciplinary perspectives, ed. Susan Šarčević, 183–206. Surrey, UK: Ashgate.

  • Shlesinger, Miriam (1997): Quality in simultaneous interpreting. In Conference interpreting: Current trends in research. Proceedings of the International Conference on Interpreting: What do we know and how?, ed. Yves Gambier, Daniel Gile, and Christopher Taylor, 123–131. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Stolze, Radegundis (1999): Expertenwissen des juristischen Fachübersetzers. In Übersetzen von Rechtstexten, ed. Peter Sandrini, 45–62. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.

  • Thieme, Stephanie (2008): Recht verständlich? Recht verstehen? Möglichkeiten und Grenzen einer sprachlichen Optimierung von Gesetzen. In Verständlichkeit als Bürgerrecht. Die Rechts- und Verwaltungsprache in der öffentlichen Diskussion, ed. Karin M. Eichhoff-Cyrus, and Gerd Antos, 230–243. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.

  • Tiersma, Peter (1999): Legal language. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Valdovinos Chávez, M. et al. (2007): Manual de lenguaje claro. 3rd ed. México, D. F.: Secretaría de la Función Pública.

  • Vlachopoulos, Stefanos (1999): Die Übersetzung von Vertragstexten: Anwendung und Didaktik. In Übersetzen von Rechtstexten, ed. Peter Sandrini, 137–154. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.

  • Weinrich, Harald (1993): Textgrammatik der deutschen Sprache. Mannheim: Duden.

  • Wydick, Richard C. (2005): Plain English for lawyers. 5th ed. Durham, North Carolina: Carolina Academic Press.

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
£23.00
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


or
Log in with your institution

Journal + Issues

Since its founding in 1956, Lebende Sprachen [Living Languages] has been the leading German journal for foreign languages in research and practice. It contains articles and reviews on language in general and also covers topics on specific languages and cultures, living languages and the life of language.

Search