What is wrong with false-link conditionals?

Karolina Krzyżanowska 1 , 2
  • 1 Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 2 University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Karolina Krzyżanowska
  • Corresponding author
  • Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
  • Email
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar

Abstract

It is a common intuition that the antecedent of an indicative conditional should have something to do with its consequent, that they should be somehow connected. In fact, many conditionals sound unacceptable precisely because they seem to suggest a connection which is not there. Although the majority of semantic theories of conditionals treat this phenomenon as something pragmatic, for instance, something that is conversationally implicated, no one has offered a full-fledged pragmatic explanation of why missing-link, and, in particular, false-link conditionals strike us as odd. The aim of this paper is to explore the possibility that the link is an example of a conversational implicature. We discuss possible tests one can employ to identify conversational implicatures, and, ultimately, we show that the connection between a conditional’s antecedent and consequent fails them all.

  • Adams, Ernest W. 1975. The logic of conditionals. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

  • Bach, Kent. 1999. The myth of conventional implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy 22. 327–366.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Beaver, David I. & Bart Geurts. 2014. Presupposition. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2014 Edition). Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/presupposition/ (accessed 1 December 2018).

  • Bennett, Jonathan. 2003. A philosophical guide to conditionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Birner, Betty J. 2013. Introduction to pragmatics (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 24). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Blome-Tillmann, Michael. 2008. Conversational implicature and the cancellability test. Analysis 68(2). 156–160.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Declerck, Renaat & Susan Reed. 2001. Conditionals: A comprehensive empirical analysis. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Douven, Igor. 2008. The evidential support theory of conditionals. Synthese 164(1). 19–44.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Douven, Igor. 2016. The epistemology of indicative conditionals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Douven, Igor. 2017. How to account for the oddness of missing-link conditionals. Synthese 194(5). 1541–1554.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Douven, Igor & Sara Verbrugge. 2012. Indicatives, concessives, and evidential support. Thinking & Reasoning 18(4). 480–499.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Douven, Igor, Shira Elqayam, Henrik Singmann & Janneke van Wijnbergen-Huitink. 2018. Conditionals and inferential connections: A hypothetical inferential theory. Cognitive Psychology 101. 50–81.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Edgington, Dorothy. 1995. On conditionals. Mind 104(414). 235–329.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Grice, Paul. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Jackson, Frank. 1987. Conditionals. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Jaszczolt, Katarzyna M. 2005. Default semantics: Foundations of a compositional theory of acts of communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Johnson-Laird, Philip N. & Ruth M. J. Byrne 2002. Conditionals: A theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference. Psychological Review 109(4). 646–678.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Krzyżanowska, Karolina. 2018. Deliberationally useless conditionals. Forthcoming in Episteme.

  • Krzyżanowska, Karolina, Sylvia Wenmackers & Igor Douven. 2013. Inferential conditionals and evidentiality. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 22(3). 315–334.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Krzyżanowska, Karolina, Sylvia Wenmackers & Igor Douven. 2014. Rethinking Gibbard’s riverboat argument. Studia Logica 102(4). 771–792.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Lauer, Sven. 2013. Towards a dynamic pragmatics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PhD dissertation.

  • Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalised conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

  • Lycan, William G. 2001. Real conditionals. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Over, David E., Constantinos Hadjichristidis, Jonathan St. B. T. Evans, Simon J. Handley & Steven A. Sloman. 2007. The probability of causal conditionals. Cognitive Psychology 54. 62–97.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Pagin, Peter & Francis Jeffrey Pelletier. 2007. Content, context and composition. In Gerhard Preyer and Georg Peter (eds.), Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism: New Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Recanati, François. 2010. Truth-conditional pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Rostworowski, Wojciech, Natalia Pietrulewicz & Marcin Będkowski. 2016. Conditionals and content connection in the experimental perspective. Manuscript.

  • Sadock, Jerrold M. 1978. On testing for conversational implicature. In Peter Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics: Pragmatics, 281–297. New York: Academic Press.

  • Skovgaard-Olsen, Niels. 2016. Motivating the relevance approach to conditionals. Mind & Language 31(5). 555–579.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Skovgaard-Olsen, Niels, Henrik Singmann & Karl Christoph Klauer. 2017. Relevance and reason relations. Cognitive Science 41(S5). 1202–1215.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Skovgaard-Olsen, Niels, Peter Collins, Karolina Krzyżanowska, Ulrike Hahn & Karl Christoph Klauer. 2019. Cancellation, negation, and rejection. Cognitive Psychology 108. 42–71.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Stalnaker, Robert C. 1968. A theory of conditionals. In Nicholas Rescher (ed.), Studies in Logical Theory (American Philosophical Quarterly Monograph Series 2), 98–112. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Unterhuber, Matthias. 2013. Possible worlds semantics for indicative and counterfactual conditionals? A formal philosophical inquiry into Chellas-Segerberg semantics. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.

  • van Rooij, Robert & Katrin Schulz. 2018. Conditionals, causality and conditional probability. Forthcoming in Journal of Logic, Language and Information.

  • Verbrugge, Sara. 2007. A psycholinguistic analysis of inferential conditional sentences. Leuven: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven PhD dissertation.

  • Woods, Michael. 2003. Conditionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
$42.00
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


or
Log in with your institution

Journal + Issues

Search