Marginal Argument Structure constructions: the [V the Ntaboo-wordout of]-construction in Post-colonial Englishes

Thomas Hoffmann 1
  • 1 Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, English and American Studies, Universitätsallee 1, Eichstätt, Germany
Thomas Hoffmann
  • Corresponding author
  • Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, English and American Studies, Universitätsallee 1, Eichstätt, Germany
  • Email
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar


Argument Structure constructions – abstract, schematic constructions that are considered to encode basic human event construals – have received considerable attention in the constructionist literature. At the same time, languages sometimes also possess what can be considered Marginal Argument constructions that are partly lexically filled and considerably more specialized in meaning, such as the V the Ntaboo-wordout of-construction. The present study focusses on the latter construction drawing on the Corpus of Web-based Global English (GloWbE). In particular, it provides empirical evidence that the productivity of the verb slot can be shown to correlate positively with the phase of a variety in the Dynamic Model.

  • Baayen, R. Harald. 2001. Word frequency distributions. (Text, Speech and Language Technologies 18). Dordrecht, Boston & London: Kluwer.

  • Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. Analyzing linguistic variation: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Baayen, R. Harald. 2009. Corpus linguistics in morphology: Morphological productivity. In Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds.), Corpus linguistics. An international handbook, Vol. 2, 899–919. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Baroni, Marco & Stefan Evert. 2014. The zipfR package for lexical statistics: A tutorial introduction. 3 October 2014. zipfR version 0.6-7. (last accessed 08 October 2018).

  • Bauer, Laurie. 2001. Morphological productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Boas, Hans C. 2003. A constructional approach to resultatives. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

  • Boas, Hans C. 2005. Determining the productivity of resultatives: A reply to Goldberg and Jackendoff. Language 81(2). 448–464.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Boas, Hans C. 2013. Cognitive Construction Grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 233–252. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Brunner, Thomas & Thomas Hoffmann. 2020. The way construction in World Englishes. English World-Wide 41(1). 1–32.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology: A study into the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Bybee, Joan L. 1995. Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10. 425–455.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Croft, William. 2012. Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Croft, William & Alan D. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Diessel, Holger. 2013. Construction Grammar and first language acquisition. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 347–378. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Evert, Stefan. 2004. A simple LNRE model for random character sequences. Proceedings of JADT 2004. 411–422.

  • Evert, Stefan & Marco Baroni. 2007. zipfR: Word frequency distributions in R. Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Posters and Demonstrations Sessions: 29–32.

  • Fillmore, Charles J. & Collin F. Baker. 2010. A Frames Approach to Semantic Analysis. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of linguistic analysis, 313–339. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Goldberg, Adele E. 2019. Explain me this: Creativity, competition and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Goldberg, Adele E. & Ray Jackendoff. 2004. The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80(3). 532–568.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Haïk, Isabelle. 2012. The hell in English grammar. In Nicole Le Querler, Franck Neveu & Emmanuelle Roussel (eds.), Relations, connexions, dépendances: Hommage au professeur Claude Guimier, 101–126. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.

  • Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hilpert, Martin. 2014. Construction Grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

  • Hoeksema, Jack & Donna J. Napoli. 2008. Just for the hell of it: A comparison of two taboo-term constructions. Journal of Linguistics 44(2). 347–378.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Hoffmann, Thomas. 2014. The cognitive evolution of Englishes: The role of constructions in the Dynamic Model. In Sarah Buschfeld, Thomas Hoffmann, Magnus Huber & Alexander Kautzsch, (eds.), The evolution of Englishes: The dynamic model and beyond, 160–180. (Varieties of English Around the World G49.) Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Hoffmann, Thomas. 2017a. From constructions to Construction Grammars. In Barbara Dancygier (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics, 284–309. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Hoffmann, Thomas. 2017b. Construction Grammars. In Barbara Dancygier (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics, 310–329. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Hoffmann, Thomas. 2019. English comparative correlatives: Diachronic and synchronic variation at the lexicon-syntax interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale (eds.). 2013. The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar (Vol. 2). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Laporte, Samantha. 2019. The patterning of the high-frequency verb make in varieties of English: A Construction Grammar approach. PhD thesis, Catholic University Louvain-la-Neuve.

  • Nelson, Gerald, Sean Wallis & Bas Aarts. 2002. Exploring natural language: Working with the British component of the International Corpus of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Perek, Florent. 2015. Argument structure in usage-based Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Perek, Florent. 2016. Using distributional semantics to study syntactic productivity in diachrony: A case study. Linguistics 54(1). 149–188.

  • Plag, Ingo. 2003. Word-formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Plag, Ingo. 2006. Productivity. In Bas Aarts & April M. S. McMahon (eds.), The handbook of English linguistics, 537–556. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

  • Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2016. English morphology and word-formation: An introduction. Berlin: Schmidt.

  • Schneider, Edgar W. 2003. The dynamics of New Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth. Language 79(2). 233–281.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Zeldes, Amir. 2013. Productive argument selection: Is lexical semantics enough? Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 9(2). 263–291.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.

Log in with your institution

Journal + Issues

Linguistics Vanguard is a new channel for high-quality articles in all major fields of linguistics. Published solely online, the multimodal journal provides an accessible platform supporting both traditional contributions as well as innovative publications featuring interactive content. Linguistics Vanguard publishes concise and up-to-date reports on the state of the art in linguistics as well as cutting-edge research papers.