Contributions of linguistic typology to psycholinguistics

  • 1 Potsdam Research Institute for Multilingualism, Universität Potsdam, Campus Golm, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24–25, 14476 Potsdam, Germany
Harald Clahsen

Abstract

This article first outlines different ways of how psycholinguists have dealt with linguistic diversity and illustrates these approaches with three familiar cases from research on language processing, language acquisition, and language disorders. The second part focuses on the role of morphology and morphological variability across languages for psycholinguistic research. The specific phenomena to be examined are to do with stem-formation morphology and inflectional classes; they illustrate how experimental research that is informed by linguistic typology can lead to new insights.

  • Albright, Adam. 2002. Islands of reliability for regular morphology: Evidence from Italian. Language 78. 684–709.

  • Albright, Adam & Bruce Hayes. 2003. Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: A computational/experimental study. Cognition 90. 119–161.

  • Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Berent, Iris, Vered Vaknin & Gary F. Marcus. 2007. Roots, stems, and the universality of lexical representations: Evidence from Hebrew. Cognition 104. 254–286.

  • Berman, Ruth A. 2014. Cross-linguistic comparisons in child language research. Journal of Child Language 41(S1). 26–37.

  • Bick, Atira S., Gadi Goelman & Ram Frost. 2011. Hebrew brain vs. English brain: Language modulates the way it is processed. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23. 2280–2290.

  • Boudelaa, Sami & William D. Marslen-Wilson. 2015. Structure, form, and meaning in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Arabic. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 30. 955–992.

  • Bybee, Joan L. & Carol Lynn Moder. 1983. Morphological classes as natural categories. Language 59. 251–270.

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Clahsen, Harald. 1986. Verb inflections in German child language: Acquisition of agreement markings and the functions they encode. Linguistics 24. 79–122.

  • Clahsen, Harald, Fraibet Aveledo & Iggy Roca. 2002. The development of regular and irregular verb inflection in Spanish child language. Journal of Child Language 29. 591–622.

  • Clahsen, Harald & Martina Penke. 1992. The acquisition of agreement morphology and its syntactic consequences: New evidence on German child language from the Simone-Corpus. In Jürgen M. Meisel (ed.), The acquisition of verb placement: Functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition, 181–223. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • De Diego Balaguer, Ruth, Nuria Sebastián-Gallés, Begoña Díaz & Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells. 2005. Morphological processing in early bilinguals: An ERP study of regular and irregular verb processing. Cognitive Brain Research 25. 312–327.

  • Farhy, Yael, João Veríssimo & Harald Clahsen. 2016. Universal and particular in morphological processing: Evidence from Hebrew. Unpublished manuscript, Universität Potsdam.

  • Field, John. 2004. Psycholinguistics: The key concepts. Abingdon: Routledge.

  • Frost, Ram, Avital Deutsch, Orna Gilboa, Michal Tannenbaum & William D. Marslen-Wilson. 2000. Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors. Memory & Cognition 28. 1277–1288.

  • Gor, Kira & Svetlana Cook. 2010. Nonnative processing of verbal morphology: In search of regularity. Language Learning 60. 88–126.

  • Grodzinsky, Yosef. 1990. Theoretical perspectives on language deficits. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Joanisse, Marc F. & Mark S. Seidenberg. 1999. Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: A connectionist model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96. 7592–7597.

  • Marcus, Gary F., Ursula Brinkmann, Harald Clahsen, Richard Wiese & Steven Pinker. 1995. German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology 29. 189–256.

  • Marcus, Gary F., Steven Pinker, Michael Ullman, Michelle Hollander, T. John Rosen, Fei Xu & Harald Clahsen. 1992. Overregularization in language acquisition (Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 228). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Marslen-Wilson, William D., Lorraine K. Tyler, Rachelle Waksler & Lianne Older. 1994. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review 101. 3–33.

  • McClelland, James L. & Karalyn Patterson. 2002. Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: What does the evidence rule out? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6. 465–472.

  • Nichols, Johanna. 2016. Morphology in linguistic typology. In Andrew Hippisley & Gregory Stump (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Orsolini, Margherira, Rachele Fanari & Hugo Bowles. 1998. Acquiring regular and irregular inflection in a language with verb classes. Language and Cognitive Processes 13. 425–464.

  • Pinker, Steven. 1999. Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York, NY: Basic Books.

  • Pinker, Steven & Michael T. Ullman. 2002. The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6. 456–463.

  • Prasada, Sandeep & Steven Pinker. 1993. Generalization of regular and irregular morphological patterns. Language and Cognitive Processes 8. 1–56.

  • Rumelhart, David E. & James L. McClelland. 1986. On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In David E. Rumelhart, James L. McClelland & The PDP Research Group (eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Vol. 2, 216–271. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Say, Tessa & Harald Clahsen. 2002. Words, rules and stems in the Italian mental lexicon. In Sieb Nooteboom, Fred Weerman & Frank Wijnen (eds.), Storage and computation in the language faculty, 93–129. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Slobin, Dan I. & Thomas G. Bever. 1982. Children use canonical sentence schemas: A crosslinguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition 12. 229–265.

  • Stanners, Robert F., James J. Neiser, William P. Hernon & Roger Hall. 1979. Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18. 399–412.

  • Stavrakaki, Stavroula & Harald Clahsen. 2009. The perfective past tense in Greek child language. Journal of Child Language 36. 113–142.

  • Stump, Gregory T. 2001. Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Townsend, David J. & Thomas G. Bever. 2001. Sentence comprehension: The integration of habits and rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Ullman, Michael T., Roumyana Pancheva, Tracy Love, Eiling Yee, David Swinney & Gregory Hickok. 2005. Neural correlates of lexicon and grammar: Evidence from the production, reading, and judgment of inflection in aphasia. Brain and Language 93. 185–238.

  • Veríssimo, João & Harald Clahsen. 2009. Morphological priming by itself: A study of Portuguese conjugations. Cognition 112. 187–194.

  • Veríssimo, João & Harald Clahsen. 2014. Variables and similarity in linguistic generalization: Evidence from inflectional classes in Portuguese. Journal of Memory and Language 76. 61–79.

  • Villalva, Alina. 2000. Estruturas morfológicas: Unidades e hierarquias nas palavras do português. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian & Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia.

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
$42.00
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


Journal + Issues

Linguistic Typology publishes research on linguistic diversity and unity. It welcomes articles that report empirical findings about crosslinguistic variation, advance our understanding of the patterns of diversity, or refine typological methodology.

Search