This paper investigates an error estimate proposed by Warnock and studied by Halton (2005). That error estimate is simply the sample standard error applied to certain non-randomized quasi-Monte Carlo points. This quasi-standard error (QSE) closely tracks the actual error in an example, and looks to be at least as accurate as a standard error based on random replication. We also show that the quasi-standard error is not unreasonably large in its intended use. But there are quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) constructions for which the QSE severely underestimates the true error. Moreover, discrepancy considerations do not separate these counter-examples from other cases where the method might be reliable. We conclude that the QSE is not yet ready to be trusted in applications.
This quarterly published journal presents original articles on the theory and applications of Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo methods. Launched in 1995 the journal covers all stochastic numerics topics with emphasis on the theory of Monte Carlo methods and new applications in all branches of science and technology.