Biomechanical Study of Two Peripheral Suture Methods on Repaired Tendons

Shixin Wang 1  and Zhenling Qiu 1
  • 1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yantai Municipal Laiyang Central Hospital. No.111, Changshan Road, Laiyang City, Shandong, P.R.China, 265200

Abstract

Flexor digitorum tendon injuries are challenging conditions to manage to ensure optimal patient outcomes. While several surgical approaches with high success rates have been developed, there remains no gold standard for suture technique for the repair of flexor tendon injuries. In this study, we compared two distinct peripheral suture methods on the strength of repaired tendons. Pig flexor digitorum profundus tendons were used in biomechanical studies and the biomechanical influence on tendon repair of continuous running peripheral suture (CRPS) and continuous locking peripheral suture (CLPS), were compared, using stitch length ranging from 1mm to 5mm. In CRPS, the 1mm stitch length group displayed the highest maximum load and breaking power, which was 1.57 fold higher than the 2mm stitch length group. Pairwise comparison revealed that the 1 and 2mm groups were statistically different from the 3, 4, and 5mm stitch length groups while comparison among the latter groups was not statistically significant. For CLPS, the 1mm group exhibited consistently the highest maximum load strength and breaking power, which was twice the strength displayed by the 2mm group. Pairwise comparisons between groups showed statistical significance. For future repairs of flexor tendon injuries, 1mm stitch length is highly recommended for simple peripheral suture.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Trybus M., Lorkowski J., Brongel L. and Hladki W., Causes and consequences of hand injuries, Am J Surg, 2006, 192, 52-57.

  • [2] Chauhan A., Palmer B.A. and Merrell G.A., Flexor Tendon Repairs: Techniques, Eponyms, and Evidence, J Hand Surg Am, 2014, 39, 1846-1853.

  • [3] Kim H.M., Nelson G., Thomopoulos S., Silva M.J., Das R. and Gelberman R.H., Technical and biological modifications for enhanced flexor tendon repair, J Hand Surg Am, 2010, 35, 1031-1037; quiz 1038.

  • [4] III J.G.S., FLEXOR TENDON REPAIR, Journal of the American Society for Surgery of Hand, 2001, 1, 177-191.

  • [5] Ishida O. and Ikuta Y., Analysis of Tsuge’s procedure for the treatment of radial nerve paralysis, Hand Surg, 2003, 8, 17-20.

  • [6] Defino H.L., Barbieri C.H., Goncalves R.P. and Paulin J.B., Studies on tendon healing. A comparison between suturing techniques, J Hand Surg Br, 1986, 11, 444-450.

  • [7] Brown S.H., Hentzen E.R., Kwan A., Ward S.R., Friden J. and Lieber R.L., Mechanical strength of the side-to-side versus Pulvertaft weave tendon repair, J Hand Surg Am, 2010, 35, 540-545.

  • [8] Bidic S.M., Varshney A., Ruff M.D. and Orenstein H.H., Biomechanical comparison of lasso, Pulvertaft weave, and side-by-side tendon repairs, Plast Reconstr Surg, 2009, 124, 567-571.

  • [9] Lister G.D., Kleinert H.E., Kutz J.E. and Atasoy E., Primary flexor tendon repair followed by immediate controlled mobilization, J Hand Surg Am, 1977, 2, 441-451.

  • [10] Wade P.J., Muir I.F. and Hutcheon L.L., Primary flexor tendon repair: the mechanical limitations of the modified Kessler technique, J Hand Surg Br, 1986, 11, 71-76.

  • [11] Lin G.T., An K.N., Amadio P.C. and Cooney W.P., 3rd, Biomechanical studies of running suture for flexor tendon repair in dogs, J Hand Surg Am, 1988, 13, 553-558.

  • [12] Diao E., Hariharan J.S., Soejima O. and Lotz J.C., Effect of peripheral suture depth on strength of tendon repairs, J Hand Surg Am, 1996, 21, 234-239.

  • [13] Bigdeli A.K., Kaczmarek I., Eifert S., Beiras-Fernandez A., Kober S., Nikolaou K., et al., Interrupted nitinol U-Clips versus standard running suture for the central arterial T-graft anastomosis: a prospective randomized study, Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2011, 40, e93-97.

  • [14] Yotsumoto T., Miyamoto W. and Uchio Y., Novel approach to repair of acute achilles tendon rupture: early recovery without postoperative fixation or orthosis, Am J Sports Med, 2010, 38, 287-292.

  • [15] Tang J.B., Wang B., Chen F., Pan C.Z. and Xie R.G., Biomechanical evaluation of flexor tendon repair techniques, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2001, 252-259.

  • [16] Cullen K.W., Tolhurst P., Lang D. and Page R.E., Flexor tendon repair in zone 2 followed by controlled active mobilisation, J Hand Surg Br, 1989, 14, 392-395.

  • [17] McCarthy D.M., Boardman N.D., 3rd, Tramaglini D.M., Sotereanos D.G. and Herndon J.H., Clinical management of partially lacerated digital flexor tendons: a survey

  • [corrected] of hand surgeons, J Hand Surg Am, 1995, 20, 273-275.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search