Predictive model of repeat induced abortion in Hungary

Zoltan Kozinszky, Iván Devosa, János Sikovanyecz 2 , Dávid Szabó 2 , Zoltán Pál 2 , Katalin Barabás 3 , and Attila Pál 2
  • 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Northern Norway, Tromsø, Sykehusveien 10, N-9038, Norway
  • 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of General Medicine, University of Szeged, Semmelweis u. 1., H-6726, Szeged, Hungary
  • 3 Institute of Behaviour Science, Section of Behaviour Science, Faculty of General Medicine, University of Szeged, Szentháromság u. 5., H-6720, Szeged, Hungary
  • 4 Applications of Informatics Department, Juhász Gyula Faculty of Education, University of Szeged, Boldogasszony sgt. 6., H-6725, Szeged, Hungary

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Hungarian Central Statistical Office (2006) Hungarian Demographic Year Book. Hungarian Central Statistical Office, Budapest

  • [2] Kozinszky Z, Boda K, Bartfai Gy (2001) Determinants of abortion among women undergoing artificial abortion using logistic regression model. Eur J Contr Reprod Health Care 6:145–152

  • [3] Kamarás F (1999) Fertility and family surveys in countries of the ECE region (Standard country report). United Nations, New York and Geneva

  • [4] United Nations (2006) Demographic Year Book. United Nations, New York

  • [5] Millar WJ, Wadhera S, Henshaw SK (1997) Repeat abortions in Canada, 1975-1993. Fam Plann Perspect 29:20–24

  • [6] Institute AG. Facts in brief: induced abortion in the United States. Available at:

  • [7] Steinhoff PG, Smith RG, Palmore JA, Diamond M, Chung CS (1979) Women who obtain repeat abortions: a study based on record linkage. Fam Plann Perspect 11:30–38

  • [8] Berger C, Gold D, Andres D, Gillett P, Kinch R (1984) Repeat abortion: Is it a problem? Fam Plann Perspect 16:70–77

  • [9] Westfall JM, Kallail KJ (1995). Repeat abortion and use of primary care health services. Fam Plann Perspect 27:162–165

  • [10] Freeman EW, Rickels K, Huggins GR, Garcia CR, Polin J (1980) Emotional distress patterns among women having first or repeat abortions. Obstet Gynecol 55:630–636

  • [11] Bajos N, Leridon H, Goulard H, Oustry P, Job-Spira N (2003) Contraception from accessibility to efficiency. Hum Reprod 18:994–999

  • [12] Glasier A (1998) Safety of emergency contraception. J Am Med Women Assoc 53:219–221

  • [13] Goulard H, Moreau C, Gilbert F, Job-Spira N, Bajos N (2006) Contraceptive failures and determinants of emergency contraceptive use. Contraception 74:208–213

  • [14] Grossmann R (2001) Emergency contraception pill can prevent abortion. Am J Public Health 97:1137–1138

  • [15] Moreau C, Bouyer J, Goulard H, Bajos N (2005) The remaining barriers to the use of emergency contraception: perception of pregnancy risk by women undergoing induced abortions Contraception 71:202–207

  • [16] Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Baird DD (1995) Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation. Effects on the probability of conception, survival of the pregnancy, and sex of the baby. N Engl J Med 333:1517–1521

  • [17] Oddens B (1996) The determinants of contraceptive use. Eburon, The Netherlands

  • [18] Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. John Wiley and Sons, New York

  • [19] Holmgren K (1994) Repeat abortion and contraceptive use. Report from an interview study in Stockholm. Gynecol Obstet Invest 37:254–259

  • [20] Moreau C, Trussell J, G. Rodriguez, Bajos N, Bouyer J (2007) Contraceptive failure rates in France: results from a population-based survey. Hum Reprod 22:2422–2427

  • [21] Skjeldestad FE (1994). The incidence of repeat induced abortion -a prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 73:706–710

  • [22] Garg M, Singh M, Mansour D (2001) Peri-abortion contraceptive care: Can we reduce the incidence of repeat abortions? J Fam Plann Repr H Care 27:77–80


Journal + Issues