A Neo-Republican Theory of Just State Surveillance

Patrick Taylor Smith 1
  • 1 Department of Philosophy, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
Patrick Taylor Smith

Abstract

This paper develops a novel, neo-republican account of just state surveillance in the information age. The goal of state surveillance should be to avoid and prevent domination, both public and private. In light of that conception of justice, the paper makes three substantive points. First, it argues that modern state surveillance based upon information technology and predicated upon a close partnership with the tech sector gives the state significant power and represents a serious potential source of domination. Second, it argues that, nonetheless, state surveillance can serve legitimate republican ends and so unilateral and private technological attempts to block it may be wrongful. Third, it argues that, despite the serious normative failings of current institutions, state surveillance can be justly regulated and made accountable through a legal liability regime that incentivizes tech company intermediaries to ally with civil society groups in order to safeguard the privacy rights of potential subjects of state surveillance.

  • Aitchinson, G. (2016). ‘Three Models of Republican Rights: Juridical, Parliamentary and Populist’, Political Studies 65 (2): 339–355.

  • Anonymous. (2018). ‘Cooperation or Resistance: The Role of Tech Companies in Government Surveillance’, Harvard Law Review 131 (6): 1722–1741.

  • Bauman, Z. (2006). Liquid Fear (Cambridge, MA: Polity).

  • Bauman, Z., Bigo, D., and Esteves, P. (2014). ‘After Snowden: Rethinking the Impact of Surveillance’, International Political Sociology 8 (2): 121–144.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Bellamy, R. (2013). ‘Rights, Republicanism and Democracy’, in A. Niederberger and P. Schink (eds.). Republican Democracy: Liberty, Laws and Politics (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press): 253–275.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Calabresi, G. (1961). ‘Some Thoughts on Risk Distribution and the Law of Torts’, Yale Law Journal 70 (4): 499–553.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Cole, D. (2014). ‘The Three Leakers and What to Do about Them’, The New York Review of Books February 6.

  • Currier, J. (2017). ‘70% of Value in Tech Is Driven by Network Effects’, NfX, November 28. https://medium.com/@nfx/70-of-value-in-tech-is-driven-by-network-effects-8c4788528e35 (Accessed July 1st, 2019).

  • Diamond, L. (1994). ‘Rethinking Civil Society’, Journal of Democracy 5 (3): 4–17.

  • Hess, A. (2016). ‘The Far Right Has a New Digital Safe Space’, The New York Times November 30.

  • Hoye, J.M. and Monaghan, J. (2015). ‘Surveillance, Freedom and the Republic’, European Journal of Political Theory 17 (3): 343–363.

  • Human Rights Watch. (2018). ‘The EU General Data Protection Regulation: Questions and Answers’, https://www.hrw.org/news/2018/06/06/eu-general-data-protection-regulation

  • Johnson, V. (2008). ‘Data Security and Tort Liability’, Journal of Internet Law 11 (7): 22–31.

  • Katz, M. and Shapiro, C. (1994). ‘System Competition and Network Effects’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (2): 93–115.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Kisielewski, A. (2016). ‘To Encrypt or Not Encrypt’, The Century Foundation, May 5. https://tcf.org/content/commentary/snowden-v-zakaria-debate-encrypt-not-encrypt/?agreed =1 (Accessed April 25, 2020) .

  • Klein, S. and Lee, C.-S. (2019). ‘Towards a Dynamic Theory of Civil Society: The Politics of Forward and Backward Infiltration’, Sociological Theory 37 (1): 62–88.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Laborde, C. (2010). ‘Republicanism and Global Justice: A Sketch’, European Journal of Political Theory 9 (1): 48–69.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Lovett, F. (2010). A General Theory of Domination and Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

  • Macnish, K. (2014). ‘Just Surveillance? Towards a Normative Theory of Surveillance’, Surveillance & Society 12 (1): 142–153.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Macnish, K. (2015). ‘An Eye for an Eye: Proportionality and Surveillance’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (3): 529–548.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Peterson, A. (2013). ‘LOVEINT: When NSA Officers Use Their Spying Power on Love Interests’. The Washington Post, August 8.

  • Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

  • Pettit, P. (2012). On the People’s Terms: A Republican Philosophy of Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

  • Priel, D. (2010). ‘A Public Role for the Intentional Torts’, King’s Law Journal 22 (2): 183–208.

  • Ripstein, A. (2009). Force and Freedom: Kant’s Moral and Political Philosophy (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

  • Roberts, A. (2015). ‘A Republican Account of the Value of Privacy’, European Journal of Political Theory 14 (3): 320–344.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Rozenshtein, A. (2018). ‘Surveillance Intermediaries’, Stanford Law Review 70 (1): pp. 91–189.

  • Silva, R. (2015). ‘Non-Domination and Political Institutions: The Contested Concept of Republican Democracy’, Brazilian Political Science Review 9 (1): 3–38.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, P.T. (2019). ‘A Normative Foundation for Statism’, Critical Review of Social and Political Philosophy Early view .

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Smith v. Maryland ( 1979 ) 442 U.S. 735.

  • Solove, D. and Citron, D. (2017). ‘Risk and Anxiety: A Theory of Data-Breach Harms’, Texas Law Review 96: 737.

  • Stahl, T. (2016). ‘Indiscriminate Mass Surveillance and the Public Sphere’, Ethics of Information Technology .

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Stilz, A. (2009). Liberal Loyalty: Freedom, Obligation, and the State (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

  • Taylor, I. (2017). ‘Data Collection, Counterterrorism and the Right to Privacy’, Politics, Philosophy, and Economics 16 (3): 326–346.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Zittrain, J. (2008). The Internet and How to Stop It (New Haven: Yale University Press).

  • Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power (New York: Public Affairs).

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
$42.00
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


or
Log in with your institution

Journal + Issues

Moral Philosophy and Politics is an international, peer-reviewed journal for original philosophical articles on issues of public relevance. Of particular interest to the journal are the philosophical assessment of policy and its normative basis, analyses of the philosophical underpinnings or implications of political debate and reflection on the justice or injustice of the social and political structures which regulate human action.

Search