The Trust Model of Children’s Rights

  • 1 Florida Institute of Technology, 150 West University Blvd, Melbourne, USA
Kenneth R. PikeORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8880-5588

Abstract

Is parental control over children best understood in terms of trusteeship or similar fiduciary obligations? This essay contemplates the elements of legal trusts and fiduciarity as they might relate to the moral relationship between children and parents. Though many accounts of upbringing advocate parent-child relationship models with structural resemblance to trust-like relationships, it is unclear who grants moral trusts, how trustees are actually selected, or how to identify proper beneficiaries. By considering these and other classical elements of relationships of trust, this essay seeks to clarify and explore the trust model’s role, if any, in understanding children’s rights. Such exploration raises the possibility that another element of common law, the duty to rescue, may serve to enhance the trust model of children’s rights.

  • Altman, S. 2018. “Parental Control Rights.” In Philosophical Foundations of Children’s and Family Law, edited by E. Brake and L. Ferguson, 209–26. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Archard, D. 2015. Children: Rights and Childhood, 3rd ed. New York: Routledge.

  • Beck, C. K., G. Glavis, S. A. Glover, M. B. Jenkins, and R. A. Nardi. 1978. “The Rights of Children: A Trust Model.” Fordham Law Review 46(4): 669–780.

  • Bogert, G. G. and G. T. Bogert. 1973. Handbook of the Law of Trusts, 5th ed. St. Paul: West Publishing Company.

  • Brighouse, H. and A. Swift. 2014. Family Values: The Ethics of Parent-Child Relationships. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Feinberg, J. 1980. “The Child’s Right to an Open Future.” In Whose Child? Children’s Rights, Parental Authority, and State Power, edited by W. Aiken and H. LaFollette, 124–53. Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield.

  • Johnston, D. 1988. The Roman Law of Trusts. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Maitland, F. W. 1911. “The Unincorporate Body.” In The Collected Papers of Frederic William Maitland: Volume Three, edited by H. A. L. Fisher, 271–84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Mariani, J. F., C. W. Kammerer, and N. Guffey-Landers. 2010. “Understanding Fiduciary Duty.” Florida Bar Journal 84(3): 21–34.

  • McGillivray, A. 2011. “Children’s Rights, Paternal Power and Fiduciary Duty: From Roman Law to the Supreme Court of Canada.” International Journal of Children’s Rights 19: 21–54, https://doi.org/10.1163/157181810X527996.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Picoult, J. 2004. My Sister’s Keeper. Atria Books, New York.

  • Scott, A. W. 1966. “The Importance of the Trust.” University of Colorado Law Review 39(2): 177–9.

  • Scott, E. S. and R. E. Scott. 1995. “Parents as Fiduciaries.” Virginia Law Review 81: 2401–76, https://doi.org/10.2307/1073583.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Seipp, D. J. 2011. “Trust and Fiduciary Duty in the Early Common Law.” Boston University Law Review 91(3): 1011–37.

  • Verlinsky, Y., S. Rechitsky, W. Schoolcraft, C. Strom, A. Kuliev. 2001. Preimplantation Diagnosis for Fanconi Anemia Combined with HLA Matching. Journal of the American Medical Association 285(24), 3130–3. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.24.3130.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Young-Bruehl, E. 2012. Childism: Confronting Prejudice Against Children. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
$42.00
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


or
Log in with your institution

Journal + Issues

Search