Points Don’t Pass – Against the Identity Theory of Passage

Thorben Petersen 1
  • 1 Department of Philosophy, University of Bremen, Blütenweg 10, 22589 Hamburg, Germany
Thorben Petersen


The basic divide in the metaphysics of time is between those who defend a dynamic view and those who defend a static view. Whereas the former hold that time does truly pass, the latter take the passage of time to be some sort of illusion. Recently, however, an alternative minority view developed, according to which passage is identical either with the succession of times in the four-dimensional manifold or with the temporally ordered sequence of events located at these. I want to argue that something is wrong with the identity theory of passage. If passage and time qua part of the manifold are identical, then talk of passage should be translatable into talk about time qua part of the manifold (and vice versa). I show that this is not always possible.

  • Chalmers, D. 1996. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    • Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Deng, N. 2010. “Beyond A- and B-Time’ Reconsidered.” Philosophia 38(4):74153.

  • Deng, N. 2013. “Fine’s McTaggart, Temporal Passage and the a Versus B-Debate.” Ratio 26(1):1934.

  • Dyke, H. 2008. Metaphysics and the Representational Fallacy. New York: Routledge.

  • Frege, G. 1892. “Über Sinn Und Bedeutung.” Zeitschrift Für Philosophie Und Philosophische Kritik, N.F 100:2550. Reprinted in: Frege, G; Textor, M. (ed.), Funktion – Begriff – Bedeutung. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen.

    • Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Friedman, M. 1983. Foundations of Space-Time Theories. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Gale, R. M. 1962. “Tensed Statements.” Philosophical Quarterly 12(46):5359.

  • Lehmkuhl, D. 2012. “On Time in Spacetime.” Philosophia Naturalis 49(2):22537.

  • Le Poidevin, R. 1998. “The Past, Present and Future of the Debate about Tense.” In Questions of Time and Tense, edited by R. Le Poidevin. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    • Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Maudlin, T. 2002. “Remarks on the Passing of Time.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102(3):23752.

  • McTaggart, J. M. E. 1908. “The Unreality of Time.” Mind 17(68):45774.

  • Mellor, D. H. 1998. Real Time II. London: Routledge.

  • Oaklander, N. 2012. “A-, B- and R-Theories of Time: A Debate.” In The Future of the Philosophy of Time, edited by A. Bardon. New York: Routledge.

    • Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Perry, J. 1979. “The Problem of the Essential Indexical.” Noûs 13(1):321.

  • Prior, A. N. 1959. “Thank Goodness That’s Over.” Philosophy 34(128):1217.

  • Rayo, A. 2013. The Construction of Logical Space. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Russell, B. 1906. “Review of Symbolic Logic and Its Applications by Hugh MacColl.” Mind 15(58):25560.

  • Savitt, S. 2002. “On Absolute Becoming and the Myth of Passage.” In Time, Reality and Experience, edited by C. Callender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Savitt, S. 2013. “Being and Becoming in Modern Physics.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 Edition), edited by E. N. Zalta forthcoming. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/spacetime-bebecome/

    • Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sider, T. 2001. Four-Dimensionalism: Am Ontology of Persistence and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Sider, T. 2011. Writing the Book of the World. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Sklar, L. 1974. Space, Time, and Spacetime. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

  • Smart, J. J. C. 1959. “Sensations and Brain Processes.” Philosophical Review 68(2):14156.

  • Thomasson, A. 2007. Ordinary Objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Williams, D. C. 1951. “The Myth of Passage.” Journal of Philosophy 48(15):45772.

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.

Log in with your institution

Journal + Issues