Meso-level Objects, Powers, and Simultaneous Causation

Tobias Hansson Wahlberg 1
  • 1 Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Tobias Hansson Wahlberg

Abstract

I argue that Mumford and Anjum’s recent theory of simultaneous causation among powerful meso-level objects is problematic in several respects: it is based on a false dichotomy, it is incompatible with standard meso-level physics, it is explanatory deficient, and it threatens to render the powers metaphysics incoherent. Powers theorists are advised, therefore, to adopt a purely sequential conception of causation.

  • Armstrong, D.M. 1983. What Is a Law of Nature?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Armstrong, D.M. 1997. A World of States of Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Aronson, J. 1971. “The Legacy of Hume’s Analysis of Causation.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 2 (2):135–156.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Benson, H. 1995. University Physics, revised ed.. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Bird, A. 2007. Nature’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Brentano, F. 1988. Philosophical Investigations on Space, Time and the Continuum. London: Croom Helm.

  • Chakravartty, A. 2013. “Getting Causes from Powers.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64:895–899.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Dowe P., 2000. Physical Causation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Dupré, J. 1993. The Disorder of Things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Ellis, B. 2001. Scientific Essentialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Fair, D. 1979. “Causation and the Flow of Energy.” Erkenntnis 14 (3):219–250.

  • Glynn, L. 2012. “Getting Causes from Powers.” Mind 121 (484):1099–1106.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Grünbaum, A. 1967. Modern Science and Zeno’s Paradoxes. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.

  • Hansson, T. 2006. “Too Many Dispositional Properties.” SATS–Nordic Journal of Philosophy 7 (2):37–42.

  • Hansson Wahlberg, T. 2009. “4-D Objects and Disposition Ascriptions.” Philosophical Papers 38 (1):35–72.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Harré, R., and E.H. Madden 1973. “Natural Powers and Powerful Natures.” Philosophy 48 (185):209–230.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Harré, R., and E.H. Madden 1975. Causal Powers: A Theory of Natural Necessity. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Hennig, B. 2016. “Getting Causes from Powers.” Philosophical Quarterly 66 (263):414–417.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Huemer, M., and B. Kovitz 2003. “Causation as Simultaneous and Continuous.” Philosophical Quarterly 53 (213):556–565.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Hume, D. 1740/1978. A Treatise of Human Nature, 2nd ed. Edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Hussey, E. 1983/1993. “Introduction.” In Aristotle Physics Books III and IV, edited by E. Hussey. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Ingthorsson, R. 2002. “Causal Production as Interaction.” Metaphysica 3 (1):87–119.

  • Ingthorsson, R. 2007. “Is There a Problem of Action at a Temporal Distance?.” SATS–Nordic Journal of Philosophy 8 (1):138–154.

  • Jammer, M. 1999. Concepts of Force. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.

  • Johnson, W.E. 1924. Logic, Part III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Körner, S., and R.M. Chisholm 1988. “Editors’ Introduction to the English Edition.” In Philosophical Investigations on Space, Time and the Continuum, edited by F. Brentano, vii-xxiii. London: Croom Helm.

  • Le Poidevin, R. 1991. Change, Cause and Contradiction. London: Macmillan.

  • Lewis, D. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

  • Lowe, E.J. 2012. “Mumford and Anjum on Causal Necessitarianism and Antecedent Strengthening.” Analysis 72 (4):731–735.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Maudlin, T. 2002. Quantum Non-Locality and Relativity, 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

  • Maudlin, T. 2012. Philosophy of Physics: Space and Time. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • McKitrick, J. 2013. “Getting Causes from Powers.” Analysis 73 (2):402–404.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Mellor, D.H. 1974. “In Defense of Dispositions.” The Philosophical Review 83 (2):157–181.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Mellor, D.H. 1995. The Facts of Causation. London: Routledge.

  • Mellor, D.H. 1998. Real Time II. London: Routledge.

  • Molnar, G. 2003. Powers: A Study in Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Mumford, S. 1998. Dispositions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Mumford, S. 2004. Laws in Nature. Abingdon: Routledge.

  • Mumford, S. 2009. “Powers and Persistence.” In Unity and Time in Metaphysics, edited by L. Honnefelder, E. Runggaldier and B. Schick, 223–236. Berlin: De Gruyter.

  • Mumford, S., and R.L. Anjum 2011. Getting Causes from Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Price, H. 1996. Time’s Arrow and Archimedes’ Point. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Russell, B. 1912–1913. “On the Notion of Cause.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 13:1–26.

  • Russell, B. 1948. Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits. London: George Allen & Unwin.

  • Shoemaker, S. 1980. “Causality and Properties.” In Time and Cause: Essays Presented to Richard Taylor, edited by P. Van Inwagen, 109–135. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, B., and A.C. Varzi 2000. “Fiat and Bona Fide Boundaries.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (2):401–420.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor, E.F., and J.A. Wheeler 1992. Spacetime Physics. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

  • Tooley, M. 1997. Time, Tense, and Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Varzi, A. 2013. “Boundary.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E.N. Zalta. Accessed 4 December 2016. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/boundary/.

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
$42.00
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


or
Log in with your institution

Journal + Issues

Search