I argue that Mumford and Anjum’s recent theory of simultaneous causation among powerful meso-level objects is problematic in several respects: it is based on a false dichotomy, it is incompatible with standard meso-level physics, it is explanatory deficient, and it threatens to render the powers metaphysics incoherent. Powers theorists are advised, therefore, to adopt a purely sequential conception of causation.
Hume, D. 1740/1978. A Treatise of Human Nature, 2nd ed. Edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hussey, E. 1983/1993. “Introduction.” In Aristotle Physics Books III and IV, edited by E. Hussey. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ingthorsson, R. 2002. “Causal Production as Interaction.” Metaphysica 3 (1):87–119.
Ingthorsson, R. 2007. “Is There a Problem of Action at a Temporal Distance?.” SATS–Nordic Journal of Philosophy 8 (1):138–154.
Jammer, M. 1999. Concepts of Force. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
Johnson, W.E. 1924. Logic, Part III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Körner, S., and R.M. Chisholm 1988. “Editors’ Introduction to the English Edition.” In Philosophical Investigations on Space, Time and the Continuum, edited by F. Brentano, vii-xxiii. London: Croom Helm.
Le Poidevin, R. 1991. Change, Cause and Contradiction. London: Macmillan.
Lewis, D. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Lowe, E.J. 2012. “Mumford and Anjum on Causal Necessitarianism and Antecedent Strengthening.” Analysis 72 (4):731–735.