- Published Online:
- 2017-03-23
- Published in Print:
- 2017-04-01
- Citation Information:
- Metaphysica, Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 61–67, eISSN 1874-6373, ISSN 1437-2053, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2016-0011.
Michael Dummett’s fecund and uncharacteristically brief article “A Defence of McTaggart’s Proof of the Unreality of Time” offers a well-known interpretation of McTaggart’s proof, and makes a number of controversial claims about a range of inter-connected theses concerning time and space. I want to sort out what is plausible in what Dummett says from what is not, and identify which theses should be endorsed by A theorists and which by B theorists. It is important, even today, to get clear about these issues and their bearing on Dummett’s interpretation of McTaggart.
Dummett, M. 1960. “A Defence of McTaggart’s Proof of the Unreality of Time.” Philosophical Review 69 (4):497–504.
Lowe, E. J. 1987. “The Indexical Fallacy in McTaggart’s Proof of the Unreality of Time.” Mind 96:62–70.
MacBeath, M. 1988. “Dummett’s Second-Order Indexicals.” Mind 97:113–16.
McTaggart, J. E. 1908. “The Unreality of Time.” Mind 17 (4):457–74.
Thomson, J. J. 2001. “McTaggart on Time.” Noûs 35:299–252.