I would like to attack a certain view: the view that the concept of identity can fail to apply to some things although, for some positive integer n, we have n of them. The idea of entities without self-identity is seriously entertained in the philosophy of quantum mechanics (QM). It is so pervasive that it has been labelled the Received View (. Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis. Oxford: Oxford UP: 105). I introduce the Received View in . In I explain what I mean by “entity” (synonymously, by “object” and “thing”), and I argue that supporters of the Received View should agree with my characterization of the corresponding notion of entity (object, thing). I also explain what I mean by “identity”, and I show that supporters of the Received View agree with my characterization of that notion. In I argue that the concept of identity, so characterized, is one with the concept of oneness. Thus, it cannot but apply to what belongs to a collection with n elements, n being a positive integer. In I add some considerations on the primitiveness of identity or unity and the status of the Identity of Indiscernibles. In I address the problem of how reference to indiscernible objects with identity can be achieved.
Dalla Chiara, M.L., and G. Toraldo Di Francia. 1993. “Individuals, Kinds and Names in Physics.” In Bridging the Gap: Philosophy, Mathematics, Physics, edited by Corsi, et al., 261–283. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Deutsch, H. 1998. “Identity and General Similarity.” In Philosophical Perspectives, Vol. 12, edited by Tomberlin, 117–199. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.
Dirac, P.A.M. 1926. “On the Theory of Quantum Mechanics.” Proceedings of the Royal Society A112:661–677.
Domenech, G., and F. Holik. 2007. “A Discussion of Particle Number and Quantum Indistinguishability.” Foundations of Physics 37:855–878.
Dorato, M., and M. Morganti. 2013. “Grades of Individuality. A Pluralistic View of Identity in Quantum Mechanics and in the Sciences.” Philosophical Studies 163:591–610.10.1007/s11098-011-9833-z)| false
Kripke, S. 1972. “Naming and Necessity.” In Semantics of Natural Language, edited by Davidson and Harman, 253–355 and 762–9. Dordrecht: Reidel. 2nd expanded ed., Oxford: Blackwell, 1980.10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_9)| false
Priest, G. 2014. One. Being an Investigation into the Unity of Reality and of Its Parts, Including the Singular Object Which Is Nothingness. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Quine, W.V.O. 1975. “On the Individuation of Attributes.” In The Logical Enterprise, eds Anderson, Barcan and Martin. New Haven, CN: Yale UP.
Reichenbach, H. , “The Genidentity of Quantum Particles”, repr, in Castellani (ed.) , Interpreting Bodies. Classical and Quantum Objects in Modern Physics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP: 61-72.
Saunders, S. 2003. “Physics and Leibniz’s Principles.” In Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections, edited by Brading and Castellani, 289–308. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Saunders, S. 2006. “Are Quantum Particles Objects.” Analysis 66:52–63.