The article, in the first part, aims at providing a positive answer to the ontological question about fictional objects starting from semantic reflections on the negative existential statements containing terms purporting to refer to such objects and the principle of compositionality. In the second part is proposed a Meinongian account of ficta, showing how it handles the problem of negative existentials without giving up neither the principle of compositionality nor our way of talking about fictional characters in the natural languages. It is also considered a particular kind of Meinongianism, namely Modal Meinongianism which seems to be the best Meinongian theory in order to explore the modal properties of ficta.
Berto, F. 2013. “Modal Meinongianism and Actuality.” Humana Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies 25:155–176.
Coffa, J.A. 1991. The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap: To the Vienna Station. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.
Frege, G. 1918. “Der Gedanke: Eine logische Untersuchung.” Beiträge zur Philosophie des Deutschen Idealismus 2:58–77. (Thoughts, English tr. by P T Geach and R H Stoothoff. In: Brian Mc Guinness (ed.). Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic and Philosophy. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1984.)
Kripke, S. 1972. “Naming and Necessity.” In Semantics of Natural Language, edited by D. Davidson and G. Harman. Dodrecht: Reidel (Nome e Necessità, Italian tr. by M. Santambrogio. Bollati Boringhieri, Torino, 1999. Selected pages reprinted in: Nomi e riferimento, in AAVV, Filosofia del linguaggio, Paolo Iacona and Elisa Paganini (eds.), Raffaello Cortina editore, Milano, 2003.).
Kripke, S. 2013. Reference and Existence: The John Locke Lectures. Oxford: Oxford U.P.