Natural Kinds, Causal Profile and Multiple Constitution

Max Kistler 1
  • 1 IHPST (Institut d’Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques), Université Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne, CNRS, 13 rue du Four, 75006, Paris, France
Max Kistler
  • Corresponding author
  • IHPST (Institut d’Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques), Université Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne, CNRS, 13 rue du Four, 75006, Paris, France
  • Email
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar

Abstract

The identity of a natural kind can be construed in terms of its causal profile. This conception is more appropriate to science than two alternatives. The identity of a natural kind is not determined by one causal role because one natural kind can have many causal roles and several functions and because some functions are shared by different kinds. Furthermore, the microstructuralist thesis is wrong: The identity of certain natural kinds is not determined by their microstructure. It is true that if A and B have the same microstructural composition then a sample of a chemical substance A is of the same chemical substance as a sample of B. However, the reverse does not hold. It is not the case that if a sample of a chemical substance A is of the same chemical substance as a sample of B then A and B have the same microstructural composition. This is because a macroscopic NK can be “multiconstituted” by different microstructures.

  • Abbott, B. 1997. “A Note on the Nature of “Water”.” Mind 106 (422):311–319.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Ahn, W.-K., C. Kalish, S.A. Gelman, D.L. Medin, C. Luhmann, S. Atran, J.D. Coley, and P. Shafto 2001. “Why Essences are Essential in the Psychology of Concepts.” Cognition 82 (1):59–69.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Aizawa, K. 2007. “The Biochemistry of Memory Consolidation: A Model System for the Philosophy of Mind.” Synthese 155 (1):65–98.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Aizawa, K. 2018. “Multiple Realization, Autonomy, and Integration.” In Explanation and Integration in Mind and Brain Science, edited by D. Kaplan, 215–235. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Aizawa, K., and C. Gillett 2009. “The (Multiple) Realization of Psychological and Other Properties in the Sciences.” Mind and Language 24:181–208.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Aizawa, K., and C. Gillett 2011. “The Autonomy of Psychology in the Age of Neuroscience.” In Causality in the Sciences, edited by P.M. Illari, F. Russo and J. Williamson, 202–223. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Anandhi, D. 2014. Introduction to Biochemistry and Metabolism. Noida (India): Dorling Kindersley.

  • Armstrong, D.M. 1997. A World of States of Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Armstrong, D.M. 2004. Truth and Truthmakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Barberousse, A., and P. Ludwig 2008. “Models as Fictions.” In Fictions in Science. Philosophical Essays in Modeling and Idealizations, edited by M. Suarez, 56–73. London: Routledge.

  • Bickle, J. 2003. Philosophy and Neuroscience: A Ruthlessly Reductive Account. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Bird, A. 2007. Nature’s Metaphysics. Laws and Properties. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Bird, A. 2015. “The Metaphysics of Natural Kinds.” Synthese doi:.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Boyd, R. 1991. “Realism, Anti-Foundationalism and the Enthusiasm for Natural Kinds.” Philosophical Studies 61:127–148.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Buller, A.R., and C.A. Townsend 2013. “Intrinsic Evolutionary Constraints on Protease Structure, Enzyme Acylation, and the Identity of the Catalytic Triad.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110 (8):E653–61.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Callender, C. 2011. “Philosophy of Science and Metaphysics.” In Continuum Companion to the Philosophy of Science, edited by S. French and J. Saatsi, 33–54. London: Continuum.

  • Chakravartty, A. 2007. A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Chaplin, M. 2016. Water Structure and Science. http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/

  • Churchland, P.M. 1979. Scientific Realism and the Plasticity of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Churchland, P.S. 1986. Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind-Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Traduit par M. Siksou. 1999. Neurophilosophie: l’esprit-cerveau. 1999. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

  • De Jong, W.W., J.A. Leunissen, and C.E.M. Voorter 1993. “Evolution of the Alpha-Crystallin/Small Heat-Shock Protein Family.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 10 (1):103–126.

    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Dumsday, T. 2013. “Using Natural-Kind Essentialism to Defend Dispositionalism.” Erkenntnis 78:869–880.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Fodor, J.A. 1974. “Special Sciences, or the Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis.” Synthese 28:97–115.

  • Gelman, S. 2003. The Essential Child: Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Gillett, C. 2003. “The Metaphysics of Realization, Multiple Realizability, and the Special Sciences.” Journal of Philosophy 100:591–603.

  • Goodwin, W. 2011. “Structure, Function, and Protein Taxonomy.” Biology and Philosophy 26:533–545.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Hempel, C.G. 1965. Empiricist Criteria of Cognitive Significance. Aspects of Scientific Explanation, 101–122. New York: Free Press.

  • Hendry, R.F. 2006. “Elements, Compounds and Other Chemical Kinds.” Philosophy of Science 73:864–875.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Huisman, T.H.J., M.F.H. Carver, and G.D. Efremov 1996. A Syllabus of Human Hemoglobin Variants. Augusta, GA: The Sickle Cell Anemia Foundation.

  • Jackson, F. 1998. From Metaphysics to Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Kim, J. 1998. Mind in a Physical World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Kistler, M. 2002. “The Causal Criterion of Reality and the Necessity of Laws of Nature.” Metaphysica 3:57–86.

  • Kistler, M. 2004. “Matérialisme et réduction de l’esprit.” In Les matérialismes (et leurs détracteurs), edited by J. Dubessy, G. Lecointre and M. Silberstein, 309–339. Paris: Syllepse. Repr. in Silberstein, Marc (ed.). 2013. Matériaux philosophiques et pour un matérialisme contemporain: Sciences, ontologie, épistémologie. Paris: Editions Matériologiques. 919–954.

  • Kistler, M. 2007. “La réduction, l’émergence, l’unité de la science et les niveaux de réalité.” Matière Première 2:67–97. Repr. in Silberstein, Marc (ed.). 2013. Matériaux philosophiques et pour un matérialisme contemporain: Sciences, ontologie, épistémologie. Paris: Editions Matériologiques. 179–212.

  • Kistler, M. 2012. “Powerful Properties and the Causal Basis of Dispositions.” In Properties, Powers and Structures. Issues in the Metaphysics of Realism, edited by A. Bird, B. Ellis and H. Sankey, 119–137. New York and Oxford: Routledge.

  • Kistler, M. 2016. L’esprit matériel : réduction et émergence. Paris: Ithaque.

  • Knobe, J., and S. Nichols 2008. Experimental Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Ladyman, J., and D. Ross 2007. Every Thing Must Go. Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Lowe, E.J. 2001. The Possibility of Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Manafu, A. 2014. “A Novel Approach to Emergence in Chemistry.” In Philosophy of Chemistry. Growth of a New Discipline, edited by E. Scerri and L. McIntyre. Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Maudlin, T. 2007. The Metaphysics Within Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Mellor, D.H. 1991. Properties and Predicates, Matters of Metaphysics, 170–182. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Mellor, D.H. 2012. “Nature’s Joints: A Realistic Defense of Natural Properties.” Ratio (New Series) 25:387–404.

  • Mill, J.S. 1843. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive. 2002. Reprise de l’édition de 1891. Honolulu (Hawaii): University Press of the Pacific.

  • Mills, E. 2014. “Mellor on the Sparseness of Natural Properties.” Ratio (New Series) 27:350–355.

  • Morris, C., and H. Lecar 1981. “Voltage Oscillations in the Barnacle Giant Muscle Fiber.” Biophysical Journal 35:193–213.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Motonori, O., Y. Isogai, and K. Nishikawa 1997. “Structural Requirement of Highly-Conserved Residues in Globins.” FEBS Letters 415 (2):129–133.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Okasha, S. 2002. “Darwinian Metaphysics: Species and the Question of Essentialism.” Synthese 131:191–213.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Prior, E.W., R. Pargetter, and F. Jackson 1982. “Three Theses about Dispositions.” American Philosophical Quarterly 19:251–257.

  • Quine, W.V.O. 1939a. “A Logistical Approach to the Ontological Problem.” Repris In The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, Revised edition, edited by W.V.O. Quine 1976, 197–202. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Quine, W.V.O. 1939b. “Designation and Existence.” Journal of Philosophy 36:701–709.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Quine, W.V.O. 1948. “On What There Is.” Repris In From A Logical Point of View, Second edition, edited by W.V.O. Quine 1953. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.

  • Saibil, H. 2013. “Chaperone Machines for Protein Folding, Unfolding and Disaggregation.” Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 14 (10):630–642.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Setoh, P., D. Wu, R. Baillargeon, and R. Gelman 2013. “Young Infants Have Biological Expectations about Animals.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 110:15937–15942.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Shapiro, L.A. 2004. The Mind Incarnate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Shoemaker, S. 1980. “Causality and Properties.” In Identity, Cause and Mind, 206–233. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. Repr. in Mellor, David Hugh, Oliver, Alex (ed.). 1997. Properties. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 228–254.

  • Slater, M.H. 2015. “Natural Kindness.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (2):375–411.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Sousa, P., S. Atran, and D. Medin 2002. “Essentialism and Folkbiology: Evidence from Brazil.” Journal of Cognition and Culture 2:195–223.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Strawson, P.F. 1959. Individuals. London: Methuen.

  • Tahko, T. 2015. “Natural Kind Essentialism Revisited.” Mind 124 (495):795–822.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Tobin, E. 2010. “Microstructuralism and Macromolecules: The Case of Moonlighting Proteins.” Foundations of Chemistry 12:41–54.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Tobin, E. 2013. “Are Natural Kinds and Natural Properties Distinct?” In Metaphysics and Science, edited by S. Mumford and M. Tugby, 164–182. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Tompa, P., C. Szasz, and L. Buday 2005. “Structural Disorder Throws New Light on Moonlighting.” Trends in Biochemical Sciences 30:484–489.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Van Holde, K.E., and I. Miller Karen 1995. “Hemocyanins.” Advances in Protein Chemistry 47:1–81.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Vorms, M. 2011. “Formats of Representation in Scientific Theorizing.” In Models, Simulations, and Representations, edited by P. Humphreys and C. Imbert. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
$42.00
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


or
Log in with your institution

Journal + Issues

Metaphysica provides an international forum of ontology and metaphysics for readers all over the world. The journal is published biannually.

Search