Time as Motion

Emiliano Boccardi 1
  • 1 Center for Logic, Epistemology and History of Science, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 13083-970, Campinas, Brazil
Emiliano Boccardi
  • Corresponding author
  • Center for Logic, Epistemology and History of Science, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, 13083-970, Brazil
  • Email
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar

Abstract

The arena of the philosophy of time has been largely concerned with deciding whether tense distinctions reflect absolute metaphysical distinctions or not. After bringing the debate over the metaphysical status of instantaneous velocity to bear on the debate over the nature of temporal passage, I argue that we should further investigate whether aspectual distinctions reflect objective and absolute metaphysical distinctions too. I conclude that those who think that being realist about tense uniquely makes room for the idea that time passes should be realist about the progressive too.

  • Albert, D. Z. 2000. Time and Chance. Cambridge (MA), London: Harvard University Press.

  • Arntzenius, F. 2000. “Are There Really Instantaneous Velocities?” The Monist 83: 187–208.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Bergson, H. 1998 [1911]. Creative Evolution. Translated by Arthur Mitchell. New York: Dover.

  • Bigelow, J. 1991. “Worlds Enough for Time.” Noûs 25: 1–19.

  • Bigelow, J., and R. Pargetter. 1990. Science and Necessity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Boccardi, E. 2015. “If It Ain’t Moving It Shall Not Be Moved.” In Special Issue of Topoi: Time and Time Experience, edited by R. Ciuni and G. Torrengo, 34 (1): 171–185.

  • Boccardi, E. 2016. “Recent Trends in the Philosophy of Time: An Introduction to Time and Reality I.” In Special Issue of Manuscrito: Time and Reality I, edited by E. Boccardi, 39: 5–34.

  • Broad, C. D. 1923. Scientific Thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Company.

  • Carroll, J. 2002. “Instantaneous Motion.” Philosophical Studies 110: 49–67.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Christensen, F. 1993. Space-Like Time. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

  • Crisp, T. 2007. “Presentism and the Grounding Objection.” NOÛS 41 (1): 90–109.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Dummett, M. 2000. “Is Time a Continuum of Instants?” Philosophy 75 (294): Oct., 2000 497–515.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Fine, K., ed. 2005. “Tense and Reality.” In Modality and Tense: Philosophical Papers, 261–320. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Forrest, P. 2004. “The Real but Dead Past: A Reply to Braddon-Mitchell.” Analysis 64: 358–362.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • James, W. 1987. Writings 1902–1910. New York, NY: Literary Classics of the United States Inc.

  • Lange, M. 2005. “How Can Instantaneous Velocity Fulfill Its Causal Role?” The Philosophical Review 114 (4): 433–468.

  • Leftow, B. 2014. “Instants, Events, and God.” In Debates in the Metaphysics of Time, edited by N. Oaklander. London: Bloomsbury.

  • McLaughlin, W., and S. Miller. 1992. “An Epistemological Use of Nonstandard Analysis to Answer Zeno’s Objections against Motion.” Synthese 92 (3): 371–384.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Montague, R. 1974. “Towards a Proper Treatment of Quantification in English.” In Formal Philosophy, edited by R. H. Thomason. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • Oaklander, N. 2010. “McTaggart’s Paradox and Crisp’s Presentism.” Philosophia 38: 229–241.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Prior, A. 1968. Papers on Time and Tense. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Prior, A. N. 1970. “The Notion of the Present.” Studium Generale 23: 245–248.

  • Robinson, A. 1966. Non-Standard Analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.

  • Russell, B. 1903 [1938]. Principles of Mathematics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.

  • Russell, B. 1981 [1929]. “Mathematics and the Metaphysicians.” In Mysticism and Logic, edited by B. Russel, 59–74. Totawa, NJ: Barnes and Noble Books.

  • Russell, B. 2001 [1929]. The Problem of Infinity Considered Historically, reprinted in Salmon, W. C., 2001, Zeno’s Paradoxes, 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co. Inc.

  • Skow, B. 2012. “Why Does Time Pass?.” Nous 46 (2012): 223–242.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, S. 2003. “Are Instantaneous Velocities Real and Really Instantaneous?.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (2003): 261–280.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Tallant, J. 2010. “A Sketch of A Presentist Theory of Passage.” Erkenntnis 73: 133–140.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Tallant, J. 2016. “Temporal Passage and the ‘No Alternate Possibilities’ Argument.” In Special Issue of Manuscrito: Time and Reality I, edited by E. Boccardi, Vol. 39: 35–47.

  • Tooley, M. 1988. “In Defense of the Existence of States of Motion.” Philosophical Topics 16 (1): 225–254.

  • Tooley, M. 1997. Time, Tense, and Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Williams, D. C. 1951. “The Myth of Passage.” Journal of Philosophy 48: 457–472.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
$42.00
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


or
Log in with your institution

Journal + Issues

Metaphysica provides an international forum of ontology and metaphysics for readers all over the world. The journal is published biannually.

Search