Priority Monism Beyond Spacetime

  • 1 Philosophy Department, 2 Rue de Candolle, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland
Baptiste Le Bihan
  • Corresponding author
  • Philosophy Department, University of Geneva, 2 Rue de Candolle, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland
  • Email
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar

Abstract

I will defend two claims. First, Schaffer’s priority monism is in tension with many research programs in quantum gravity. Second, priority monism can be modified into a view more amenable to this physics. The first claim is grounded in the fact that promising approaches to quantum gravity such as loop quantum gravity or string theory deny the fundamental reality of spacetime. Since fundamental spacetime plays an important role in Schaffer’s priority monism by being identified with the fundamental structure, namely the cosmos, the disappearance of spacetime in these views might undermine classical priority monism. My second claim is that priority monism can avoid this issue with two moves: first, in dropping one of its core assumption, namely that the fundamental structure is spatio-temporal, second, by identifying the connection between the non-spatio-temporal structure and the derivative spatio-temporal structure with mereological composition.

  • Armstrong, D.M. 1978. “Naturalism, Materialism and First Philosophy.” Philosophia 8 (2–3):261–276.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Benocci, M. 2017. “Priority Monism and Essentiality of Fundamentality: A Reply to Steinberg.” Philosophical Studies 174 (8):1983–1990.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Chalmers, D.J. 1995. “Facing up to the Problem of Consciousness.” Journal of Consciousness Studies ^2 (3):200–219.

  • Crowther, K.J. 2016. Effective Spacetime: Understanding Emergence in Effective Field Theory and Quantum Gravity. New York, NY: Springer.

  • Dowker, F. 2014. “The Birth of Spacetime Atoms as the Passage of Time.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1326:18–25.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Export Citation
  • Halvorson, H., and R. Clifton. 2002. “No Place for Particles in Relativistic Quantum Theories?.” Philosophy of Science 69 (1):1–28.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Huggett, N. 2017. “Target Space ≠ Space.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. doi: .

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Huggett, N., and C. Wüthrich. 2013. “Emergent Spacetime and Empirical (In)Coherence.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44 (3):276–285.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Le Bihan, B. 2015a. “Un espace-temps de contingences.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Rennes 1.

  • Le Bihan, B. 2015b. “No Physical Particles for a Dispositional Monist?.” Philosophical Papers 44 (2):207–232.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Le Bihan, B. 2016. “Super-Relationism: Combining Eliminativism about Objects and Relationism about Spacetime.” Philosophical Studies 173 (8):21522178.

  • Malament, D.B. 1977. “The Class of Continuous Timelike Curves Determines the Topology of Spacetime.” Journal of Mathematical Physics 18 (7):1399–1404. doi:.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Matsubara, K. 2013. “Realism, Underdetermination and String Theory Dualities.” Synthese 190 (3):471–489.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Matsubara, K. 2017. “Quantum Gravity and the Nature of Space and Time.” Philosophy Compass 12:3.

  • Maudlin, T.W.E. 2007. “Completeness, Supervenience and Ontology.” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 40 (12):3151.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Monton, B. 2006. “Quantum Mechanics and 3ndimensional Space.” Philosophy of Science 73 (5):778–789.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Ney, A. 2015. “Fundamental Physical Ontologies and the Constraint of Empirical Coherence: A Defense of Wave Function Realism.” Synthese 192 (10):3105–3124.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Paul, L.A. 2002. “Logical Parts.” Noûs 36 (4):578–596.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Paul, L.A. 2012. “Building the World from Its Fundamental Constituents.” Philosophical Studies 158 (2):221–256.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Rovelli, C. 2004. Quantum Gravity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Rovelli, C., and F. Vidotto. 2014. Covariant Loop Quantum Gravity: An Elementary Introduction to Quantum Gravity and Spinfoam Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Schaffer, J. 2009. “Spacetime the One Substance.” Philosophical Studies 145 (1):131–148.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Schaffer, J. 2010. “Monism: The Priority of the Whole.” Philosophical Review 119 (1):31–76.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Sidelle, A. 1989. Necessity, Essence, and Individuation: A Defense of Conventionalism. Cornell University Press.

  • Siegel, M. 2016. “Priority Monism Is Contingent.” Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):23–32. Ithaca.

  • Sklar, L. 1974. Space, Time and Spacetime. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Steinberg, A. 2015. “Priority Monism and Part/Whole Dependence.” Philosophical Studies 172 (8):2025–2031.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Wüthrich, C. 2012. “The Structure of Causal Sets.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 43 (2):223–241.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Wüthrich, C. 2017a. “Raiders of the Lost Spacetime.” In Towards a Theory of Spacetime Theories, edited by D. Lehmkuhl, G. Schiemann and E. Scholz. New York, NY: Springer.

  • Wüthrich, C. 2017b. “Philosophie Der Physik.” In Grundriss Wissenschaftsphilosophie: Die Philosophien Der Einzelwissenschaften, edited by S. Lohse and T. Reydson, 201–228. Hamburg: Meiner.

  • Wüthrich, C., and C. Callender. 2017. “What Becomes of a Causal Set?.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68 (3):907–925.

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
$42.00
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


Journal + Issues

Metaphysica provides an international forum of ontology and metaphysics for readers all over the world. The journal is published biannually.

Search