Overcoming Metametaphysics: Nietzsche and Carnap

Felipe G.A. Moreira 1
  • 1 Department of Philosophy, University of Miami, 1252 Memorial Drive, Ashe 721, Coral Gables, USA
Felipe G.A. Moreira
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Philosophy, University of Miami, 1252 Memorial Drive, Ashe 721, FL 33124-4670, Coral Gables, USA
  • Email
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar


This essay focuses on the similarities between Nietzsche’s and Carnap’s views on metaphysics, without ignoring their obvious differences. The essay argues that Nietzsche and Carnap endorse but interpret differently an overcoming metametaphysics characterized by the conjunction of the following three claims: (O-i) an overcoming of metaphysics ought to be performed; (O-ii) this overcoming is to be performed by adopting a method of linguistic analysis that is suspicious of the metaphysical use of language and that interprets such use through a different use of language which aims to avoid metaphysics; and (O-iii) this overcoming contributes to the political task of resisting “diseased” metaphysical practices and promoting “healthy” non-metaphysical practices.

  • Abel, Günter: „Consciousness, Language, and Nature: Nietzsche’s Philosophy of Mind and Nature“, in: Manuel Dries / P.J.E. Kail (Hg.), Nietzsche on Mind and Nature (Oxford 2015), S. 37–56

  • Ahern, Daniel R.: Nietzsche as Cultural Physician (University Park, PA 1995)

  • Ayer, A.J.: Language, Truth and Logic (London 1936)

  • Boonzaier, Emile / Malherbe, Candy / Smith, Andy / Berens, Penny: The Cape Herders: A History of the Khoikhoi of Southern Africa (Cape Town 1996)

  • Bueno, Otávio: „Carnap, Logicism, and Ontological Commitment“, in: Sorin Costreie (Hg.), Early Analytic Philosophy: New Perspectives on the Tradition (Dordrecht 2016), S. 337–352

  • Camp, Elisabeth: „The Generality Constraint and Categorical Restrictions“, in: Philosophical Quarterly 54/215 (2004), S. 209–231

  • Carnap, Rudolf: „Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology“, in: Meaning and Necessity: A Study of Semantics and Modal Logic (Chicago 1956), S. 222–229

  • Carnap, Rudolf: „Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology“, in: Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4 (1950), S. 20–40

  • Carnap, Rudolf: „Intellectual Autobiography“, in: Paul Arthur Schilpp (Hg.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap (Chicago 1963), S. 1–84

  • Carnap, Rudolf: „Lectures in Europe (Items 18–29)“, Unpublished Manuscript (1929–37), University of Pittsburgh, Archive for Scientific Philosophy

  • Carnap, Rudolf: „Lectures in Europe (Items 43–54)“, Unpublished Manuscript (1922–1933), University of Pittsburgh, Archive for Scientific Philosophy

  • Carnap, Rudolf: „Logic“, in: Factors Determining Human Behavior (Cambridge 1937), S. 107–118

  • Carnap, Rudolf: „On the Character of Philosophic Problems“, trans. William M. Malisoff, in: Philosophy of Science 1 (1934), S. 5–19

  • Carnap, Rudolf: „Schema für den 9. Rundbrief“, Unpublished Manuscript (1918), University of Pittsburgh, Archive for Scientific Philosophy

  • Carnap, Rudolf: „The Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Language“, trans. Arthur Pap, in: A.J. Ayer (Hg.), Logical Positivism (New York 1959), S. 60–81

  • Carnap, Rudolf: The Logical Structure of the World and Pseudoproblems in Philosophy, trans. Rolf A. George (Chicago 2003)

  • Carnap, Rudolf: „Theoretische Fragen und praktische Entscheidungen“, in: Natur und Geist 2.9 (1934), S. 257–260

  • Carnap, Rudolf: „Überwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache“, in: Erkenntnis 2 (1931), S. 219–241

  • Carnap, Rudolf: „,Vom Chaos zur Wirklichkeit‘ (mit Notizen zum Konstitution-System)“, Unpublished Manuscript (1921–1926), University of Pittsburgh, Archive for Scientific Philosophy

  • Carnap, Rudolf / Hahn, Hans / Neurath, Otto: „Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung: Der Wiener Kreis [The Scientific Conception of the World: The Vienna Circle]“, in: Otto Neurath (Autor) / Marie Neurath / Robert S. Cohen (Hg.), Empiricism and Sociology (Dordrecht 1973), S. 299–318

  • Carus, A.W.: Carnap and Twentieth-Century Thought: Explication as Enlightenment (Cambridge 2007)

  • Chalmers, David: „Ontological Anti-Realism“, in: David Chalmers / David Manley / Ryan Wasserman (Hg.), Metametaphysics (Oxford 2009), S. 77–129

  • Clark, Maudemarie: Nietzsche on Truth and Philosophy (Cambridge 1990)

  • Critchley, Simon: Continental Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford 2001)

  • Deleuze, Gilles: Nietzsche and Philosophy (New York 1983)

  • Derrida, Jacques: Of Spirit: Heidegger and the question (Chicago 1989)

  • Farías, Víctor: Heidegger and Nazism (Philadelphia 1989)

  • Friedman, Michael: A Parting of the Ways (Chicago 2000)

  • Friedman, Michael: Reconsidering Logical Positivism (Cambridge 1999)

  • Gabriel, Gottfried: „Carnap’s ‚Elimination of metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Language‘: A Retrospective Consideration of the Relationship between Continental and Analytic Philosophy“, in: Paolo Parrini / Wesley C. Salmon / Merrilee H. Salmon (Hg.), Logical Empiricism: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives (Pittsburgh, PA 2003), S. 30–42

  • Haack, Susan: „Some Preliminaries to Ontology“, in: Journal of Philosophical Logic 5.4 (1976), S. 457–474

  • Hales, Steven D.: „Nietzsche on Logic“, in: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56.4 (1996), S. 819–835

  • Heidegger, Martin: Nietzsche: Volumes One and Two, ed. David Farrell Krell (San Francisco, CA 1991)

  • Heidegger, Martin: Nietzsche: Volumes Three and Four, ed. David Farrell Krell (San Francisco, CA 1991)

  • Heidegger, Martin: „Was ist Metaphysik?“, in: Martin Heidegger, Gesamtausgabe, Bd. 9 (Frankfurt a. M. 1976), S. 103–122

  • Heidegger, Martin: “What is Metaphysics?”, in: Basic Writings, ed. and trans. David Farrel Krell, 2nd edn., rev. and exp. (San Francisco, CA 1993), S. 93–110

  • Hirsch, Eli: Quantifier Variance and Realism (Oxford 2011)

  • Kallen, Horace M.: „The Meanings of ‚Unity‘ Among the Sciences, Once More“, in: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 6.4 (1946), S. 493–496

  • Kaufmann, Walter: Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist (Princeton, NJ 1950)

  • Moore, A.W.: The Evolution of Modern Metaphysics: Making Sense of Things (Cambridge 2012)

  • Moreira, Felipe G.A.: „An Apology of Carnap“, in: Manuscrito 37.2 (2014), S. 261–289

  • Mormann, Thomas: „Carnap’s Boundless Ocean of Unlimited Possibilities: Between Enlightenment and Romanticism“, in: Pierre Wagner (Hg.), Carnap’s Ideal of Explication and Naturalism (New York 2012), S. 63–80

  • Müller-Lauter, Wolfgang: Nietzsche: His Philosophy of Contradictions and the Contradictions of His Philosophy (Urbana, IL 1999)

  • Nehamas, Alexander: Nietzsche: Life as Literature (Cambridge 1985)

  • Neurath, Otto: Gesammelte philosophische und methodologische Schriften (Vienna 1981)

  • Neurath, Otto: Philosophical Papers 1913–1946 (Dordrecht 1983)

  • Neurath, Otto: „The Orchestration of the Sciences by the Encyclopedism of Logical Empiricism“, in: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 6.4 (1946), S. 496–508

  • Overgaard, Søren / Gilbert, Paul / Burwood, Paul / Burwood, Stephen: An Introduction to Metametaphysics (Cambridge 2013)

  • Poellner, Peter: Nietzsche and Metaphysics (Oxford 1995)

  • Price, Huw: „Metaphysics After Carnap: The Ghost Who Walks?“, in: David Chalmers / David Manley / Ryan Wasserman (Hg.), Metametaphysics (Oxford 2009), pp. 320–346

  • Psillos, Stathis: Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth (New York 1999)

  • Putnam, Hilary: „Philosophers and Human Understanding“, in: Realism and Reason: Philosophical Papers 3 (Cambridge 1981), S. 184–204

  • Quine, Willard Van Orman: „Two Dogmas of Empiricism“, in: Philosophical Review 60.1 (1951), S. 20–43

  • Ratner-Rosenhagen, Jennifer: American Nietzsche: A History of an Icon and His Ideas (Chicago 2012)

  • Reck, Erich H.: „Carnap and Modern Logic“, in: Michael Friedman / Richard Creath (Hg.), The Cambridge Companion to Carnap (Cambridge 2007), S. 176–199

  • Reichenbach, Hans: The Rise of Scientific Philosophy (California 1951)

  • Reisch, George A.: How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science: to the Icy Slopes of Logic (Cambridge 2005)

  • Richardson, Alan W.: „Carnapian Pragmatism“, in: Michael Friedman / Richard Creath (Hg.), Cambridge Companion to Carnap (Cambridge 2007), S. 295–315

  • Richardson, Alan W.: Carnap’s Construction of the World: The Aufbau and the Emergence of Logical Empiricism (Cambridge 1998)

  • Richardson, John: Nietzsche’s New Darwinism (Oxford 2004)

  • Richardson, John: Nietzsche’s System (Oxford 1996)

  • Ricketts, Thomas: „Carnap’s principle of tolerance, empiricism, and conventionalism“, in: Bob Hale / Peter Clark (Hg.), Reading Putnam (Oxford 1994), S. 176–200

  • Sachs, Carl B.: „What is to be Overcome? Nietzsche, Carnap, and Modernism as the Overcoming of Metaphysics“, in: History of Philosophy Quarterly 28.3 (2011), S. 303–318

  • Stone, Abraham D.: „Heidegger and Carnap on the Overcoming of Metaphysics“, in: Stephen Mulhall (Hg.), Martin Heidegger (London 2006), S. 217–244

  • Thomasson, Amie L.: Ontology Made Easy (Oxford 2015)

  • Uebel, Thomas: „Carnap, Philosophy and ‚Politics in its Broadest Sense‘“, in: Richard Creath (Hg.), Carnap and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism (Dordrecht 2012), S. 133–148

  • Uebel, Thomas: „On the Production, History, and Aspects of the Reception of the Vienna Circle’s Manifesto“, in: Perspectives on Science 16.1 (2008), S. 70–102

  • Uebel, Thomas: „Political Philosophy of Science in Logical Empiricism: the Left Vienna Circle“, in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 36 (2005), S. 754–763

  • Uebel, Thomas: „Reconstruction as Elucidation? Carnap in the Early Protocol Sentence Debate“, in: Synthese 93.1/2 (1992), S. 107–140

  • Wotling, Patrick: Nietzsche et le problème de la civilisation (Paris 1995)

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.

Log in with your institution

Journal + Issues

Nietzsche-Studien is the world’s leading organ for Nietzsche research. It publishes contributions from all disciplines that deal with Nietzsche’s life, work, and impact and spotlights the relevance of his thought for current debates. It is not committed to any particular school of thought and features essays, discussions, documentary research, investigations of primary sources, contributions to reception studies, miscellanea, and reviews.