MEDEA: Crowd-Sourcing the Recording of Metal-Detected Artefacts in Flanders (Belgium)

Pieterjan Deckers 1 , Lizzy Bleumers 2 , Sanne Ruelens 2 , Bert Lemmens 3 , Nastasia Vanderperren 3 , Clémence Marchal 1 , Jo Pierson 2  and Dries Tys 1
  • 1 Department of Art Studies and Archaeology, Brussels Free University, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
  • 2 iMinds-SMIT, Brussels Free University, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
  • 3 PACKED vzw, Centre of Expertise in Digital Heritage, 1080 Brussels, Belgium

Abstract

Since 2016, hobby metal-detecting is legal in Flanders (Belgium), although it was unofficially tolerated for many years before. However, research on metal-detected artefacts in Flanders is hindered by a low reporting rate. The MEDEA project aims to address this by encouraging detectorists to record their finds on an online platform. Finds experts are invited to enrich records with further information and thus instigate a rewarding feedback cycle. This paper discusses MEDEA’s ‘Human-Centred Design’ development process and the design choices underpinning the platform. MEDEA may be seen as an example of ‘Open Archaeology’ and related trends in digital humanities.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Beck, A., & Neylon, C. (2012). A vision for Open Archaeology. World Archaeology, 44(4), 479-497.

  • The Community Roundtable (2014). State of Community Management 2014. http://www.communityroundtable.com/research/state-of-community-management-2014/ (30.09.2016).

  • Dallas, C. (2015). Curating Archaeological Knowledge in the Digital Continuum: from Practice to Infrastructure. Open Archaeology, 1, 176-207. https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/opar.2014.1.issue-1/opar-2015-0011/opar-2015-0011.xml (30.09.2016).

  • Deckers, P. (2012). Everbeek Roman Silver Hoard. Trafficking Culture Encyclopedia, http://traffickingculture.org/encyclopedia/case-studies/everbeek-roman-silver-hoard/ (30.09.2016).

  • Deckers, P. (2013a). Past, present and future of archaeological metal-detecting by amateurs in Flanders (Belgium). AP: Online Journal in Public Archaeology, 3, 13–17.

  • Deckers, P. (2013b). Resultaten van de online enquête “Amateurmetaaldetectie in Vlaanderen” (unpublished document).

  • Deckers, P. (2014). “Productive sites” in the polders? “Griffin brooches” and other early medieval metal artefacts from the Belgian coastal plain. Medieval and Modern Matters, 3, 21–43.

  • Deckers, P. (forthcoming). Legislation, policy and practice of a hobby: archaeological metal detection by amateurs in Flanders. In S. Campbell, S. Thomas & L. White (Eds.), Competing Values in Archaeological Heritage. Springer.

  • Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., et al. (2011). From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining “Gamification”. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments. (pp. 9–15). New York, NY: ACM.

  • Dobat, A.S. (2013). Between rescue and research: An evaluation after 30 years of liberal metal detecting in archaeological research and heritage practice in Denmark. European Journal of Archaeology, 16, 704–725.

  • Dobat, A.S., & Jensen, A.T. (2016). “Professional Amateurs”. Metal Detecting and Metal Detectorists in Denmark. Open Archaeology, 2, 70-84. https://www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/j/opar.2016.2.issue-1/opar-2016-0005/opar-2016-0005.xml (10.11.2016).

  • Dunn, S., & Hedges, M. (2013). Crowd-sourcing as a component of humanities research infrastructures. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 7(1-2), 147-169.

  • European Communities (2004). European Interoperability Framework for Pan-European eGovernment Services, version 1.0. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

  • Kujala, S. (2003). User involvement: a review of the benefits and challenges. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22(1), 1–16.

  • Le Boeuf, P., Doerr, M., Ore, C.E. et al. (Eds.). (2015). Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model version 6.2.1. http://cidoc-crm.org/docs/cidoc_crm_version_6.2.1.pdf (30.09.2016).

  • Lewis, M. (2013). The PAS - a rather British solution. The mandatory reporting and voluntary recording of archaeological objects in England and Wales. In A. Largerlof A. (Ed.), Who Cares? Perspectives on Public Awareness, Participation and Protection in Archaeological Heritage Management (EAC Occasional Paper). (pp. 17–21). Budapest: Archaeolingua.

  • Lewis, M. (2016). A Detectorist’s Utopia? Archaeology and Metal-Detecting in England and Wales. Open Archaeology, 2, 127-139. https://www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/j/opar.2016.2.issue-1/opar-2016-0009/opar-2016-0009.xml (10.11.2016).

  • Meylemans, E. (Ed.). (2004). CAI-I. De opbouw van een archeologisch beleidsinstrument, IAP-Rapporten. Brussel: Instituut voor het Archeologisch Patrimonium.

  • NWO (2016). PAN: Portable Antiquities of the Netherlands. http://www.nwo.nl/onderzoek-en-resultaten/onderzoeksprojecten/i/20/26420.html (30.09.2016).

  • Onroerend Erfgoed (2014). Onroerend Erfgoed. De regelgeving. Brussel: Vlaamse Overheid, Agentschap Onroerend Erfgoed. https://www.onroerenderfgoed.be/assets/files/news/downloads/140915_LV_RWO_Brochure_regelgeving.pdf (30.09.2016).

  • Onroerend Erfgoed (2015). Bijlage. Code van goede praktijk voor de uitvoering van en rapportering over archeologisch vooronderzoek en archeologische opgravingen en het gebruik van metaaldetectoren (versie 1.0). https://www.onroerenderfgoed.be/assets/files/content/images/Code_van_Goede_Praktijk.pdf (30.09.2016).

  • Phillips, L.B. (2013). The temple and the bazaar: Wikipedia as a platform for open authority in museums. Curator: The Museum Journal, 56, 219–235.

  • Rasmussen, J.M. (2014). Securing cultural heritage and fencing stolen goods? A case study on museums and metal detecting in Norway. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 47, 83–107.

  • Ribbens, R. (2011). Facts of archaeology. Archeologisch Vlaanderen in cijfers: 2004-2010, in: Congresbundel Archeologisch Forum 16 April 2011, Vrije Universiteit Brussel. Forum Vlaamse Archeologie vzw, 16–17.

  • Robbins, K.J. (2013). Balancing the scales: Exploring the variable effects of collection bias on data collected by the Portable Antiquities Scheme. Landscapes, 14, 54–72.

  • Scherzler, D. & Siegmund, F. (Eds.). (2015). Tübingen theses on archaeology. Archäologische Informationen, Early View, published online 12 Nov. 2015. http://www.dguf.de/fileadmin/AI/ArchInf-EV_Tuebingen-Theses.pdf (30.09.2016).

  • Seaborn, K., & Fels, D.I. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74, 14–31.

  • Shirk, J.L., Ballard, H.L., Wilderman, C.C., et al. (2012). Public participation in scientific research: a framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society 17(2), http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss2/art29/ (30.09.2016).

  • Steen, M. (2012). Human-centered design as a fragile encounter. Design Issues, 28(1), 72–80.

  • Vanderbeken, T., & Vansant, V. (2013). ZOLAD+. Intergemeentelijke projectvereniging voor het onroerend erfgoed. Jaarverslag 2012. Riemst: ZOLAD+.

  • Wilson, A.T., & Edwards, B. (2015). Open Source Archaeology: Ethics and Practice. Warshaw-Berlin: De Gruyter Open.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search