Re-Presenting the Past: A New Archaeological Outreach Strategy for the Canadian Territory of Nunavut

Brendan Griebel 1 , Torsten Diesel 2  and Tim Rast 3
  • 1 Kitikmeot Heritage Society, Cambridge Bay, X0B 0C0, Nunavut, Canada
  • 2 Inuit Heritage Trust, Iqaluit, X0A 0H0, Nunavut, Canada
  • 3 Elfshot, St Johns, A1B 4J9, Newfoundland, Canada


In 2013, an Arctic-based organization known as the Inuit Heritage Trust spearheaded a new campaign to increase archaeological awareness in the Canadian territory of Nunavut. While Nunavut remains an Inuit-centered territory—founded on the knowledge and values that have long sustained its predominantly Inuit population—the rules and regulations surrounding archaeological resources are largely grounded in more scientific, and distinctly non-Inuit, valuations of the past. For multiple reasons, Inuit and non-Inuit traditions for understanding and preserving heritage resources have proved difficult to reconcile, despite numerous attempts at community outreach programs and the regular hosting of archaeological fieldschools. For many Inuit, the methodological and impersonal approach to history endorsed by incoming archaeologists remains a foreign concept. This paper will present a series of community resources developed as part of the Inuit Heritage Trust’s new archaeological awareness campaign, produced in partnership with archaeologists Brendan Griebel and Tim Rast. These resources seek to address the question of how to educate about Nunavut’s past through a framework that aligns with the interests and realities of both professional archaeologists and Inuit populations. To date, this campaign has produced two unique resources: the first, a guidebook series that explores archaeology’s relevance to community members, students and heritage workers in Nunavut, and the second, a portable excavation and experimental archaeology kit. While the campaign does not intend to change the way that either Inuit or archaeologists value the past, it does attempt to create a mutual awareness of differing worldview so that both groups might better navigate the complex landscape of regulation and interaction ascribed to Nunavut’s heritage resources.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Anawak, J. (1989). Inuit Perceptions of the Past. In Layton, R. (Ed.), Who Needs the Past: Indigenous Values and Archaeology (pp. 45-51). London: Taylor & Francis.

  • Arnold, C. and Stenton, D. (2002). New Archaeological Regulations for the Northwest Territories and Nunavut, Canada. Revista de Arqueología Americana, 21, pp.33-43.

  • Briggs, J. (1992). Lines, Cycles and Transformations: Temporal Perspectives on Inuit Action. In Wallman, S. (Ed.), Contemporary Futures. Perspectives from Social Anthropology (pp. 83-108). London: Routledge.

  • Brown, S. (n.d.). AIA Basics of Archaeology for Simulated Dig Users. Accessed January 2016. education/lessons/simulateddigs

  • Dawson, P., Levy, R., Lyons, N. (2011). Breaking the fourth wall’: 3D virtual worlds as tools for knowledge repatriation in archaeology. Journal of Social Archaeology, 11(3), pp. 387–402.

  • Fitzhugh, W., Loring, S. (2002). Introduction. In Fitzhugh, W., Loring, S., Odess, D. (Eds.), Honoring Our Elders: A History of Eastern Arctic Archaeology (pp.1-33). Washington: Arctic Studies Center.

  • Friesen, M. (2002). Analogues at Iqaluktuuq: the social context of archaeological inference in Nunavut, Arctic Canada. World Archaeology, 34(2): pp.211-219.

  • Gadoua, M. (2014). Making Sense through Touch: Handling Collections with Inuit Elders and the McCord Museum. The Senses & Society, 9 (3), pp. 323-341.

  • Graburn, N. (1998). Weirs in the River of Time: The Development of Historical Consciousness among Canadian Inuit. Museum Anthropology, 22 (1), pp. 18-3.

  • Griebel, B. (2010). A Conflict of Interest: A Case Study for Community Archaeology in the Canadian Arctic. MUSEUM International, 62 (1‐2), pp.75-80.

  • Griebel, B. (2013a). Negotiating Northern Pasts: One Archaeologist’s Reflections on Learning to Teach History in Nunavut. Canadian Issues, Winter 2013, pp. 14-19.

  • Griebel, B. (2013b). Re-charting the Courses of History: Mapping Concepts of Community, Archaeology, and Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit in the Canadian Territory of Nunavut. Doctoral Dissertation. Retrieved from University of Toronto database.

  • Helmer, J., Lemoine, G. (2002). The 1992 Permitting “Crisis” in Eastern Arctic Archaeology. In Fitzhugh, W., Loring, S., Odess, D. (Eds.), Honoring Our Elders: A History of Eastern Arctic Archaeology (pp.253-260). Washington: Arctic Studies Center.

  • Hoffman, G. (2010). Dig It!: Discovering Archaeology. A Standards-Linked Resource Packet for Teachers. Haffenreffer Museum of Anthropology. Brown University.

  • Hollowell, J. (2006). Moral arguments on subsistence digging, In Scarre, C. and Scarre, G. (Eds.), The Ethics of Archaeology: Philosophical Perspectives on Archaeological Practice (pp. 69-93). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Huntington, H. (2005). We Dance Around in a Ring and Suppose: Academic Engagement with Traditional Knowledge. Arctic Anthropology, 42(1): pp. 29–32.

  • IHT and NDE (Inuit Heritage Trust and Nunavut Department of Education). (2005) Arctic Peoples and Archaeology. http://www.

  • Jones, A. (2007). Memory and Material Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Loring, S. (2008). The Wind Blows Everything Off the Ground: New Provisions and New Directions in Archaeological Research in the North. In Killion, T. (Ed.), Opening Archaeology: the Impact of Repatriation on the Discipline (pp. 181– 194). Santa Fe, New Mexico: School of American Research.

  • Lyons, N. (2013). Where the Winds Blow Us: Practicing Critical Community Archaeology in the Canadian North. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

  • Lyons, N., Dawson, P., Walls, M., Uluadluak, D., Angalik, L., Kalluak, M., Kigusiutuak, P., Kiniksi, L., Karetak, J., Suluk, L. (2010). Person, Place, Memory, Thing: How Inuit Elders are Informing Archaeological Practice in the Canadian North. Canadian Journal of Archaeology, 34, pp.1–31.

  • McCartney, A. (Ed.) (1979). Archaeological Whale Bone: A Northern Resource. First Report of the Thule Archaeology Conservation Project. Anthropological Papers 1.Fayetteville: University of Arkansas

  • Nickels, S., Shirley, J., and Laidler, G. (Eds.) (2007) Negotiating Research Relationships with Inuit Communities: A Guide for Researchers, Ottawa and Iqaluit: Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Nunavut Research Institute.

  • NLCA (Nunavut Land Claims Agreement) (1993). Agreement Between the Inuit of the Nunavut Settlement Area and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada.

  • Pye, E. (Ed.) (2008). The Power of Touch: Handling Objects in Museum and Heritage Context. University College London Institute of Archaeology Publications. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

  • Rockman, M. and Flatman, J. (Eds.) (2011) Archaeology in Society: Its Relevance in the Modern World. New York: Springer.

  • Rowley, S. (2002). Inuit Participation in the Archaeology of Nunavut. In Fitzhugh, W., Loring, S., Odess, D. (Eds.), Honoring Our Elders: A History of Eastern Arctic Archaeology, (261-272). Washington: Arctic Studies Center.

  • Sejersen, F. (2004). Horizons of Sustainability in Greenland: Inuit Landscapes of Memory and Vision. Arctic Anthropology. 41(1). pp.71-89.

  • Stenton, D. (2003). Guidelines for Applicants and Holders of Nunavut Territory Archaeology and Palaeontology Permits. Government of Nunavut, Department of Culture, Language, Elders and Youth.

  • Stenton, D. and Rigby, B. (1995). Community-Based Heritage Education, Training, and Research: Preliminary Report on the Tungatsivvik Archaeological Project. Arctic, 48, pp. 47-56.

  • Stewart, A., Keith, D., Scottie, J. (2004). Caribou Crossings and Cultural Meanings: Placing Traditional Knowledge and Archaeology in Context in an Inuit Landscape. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 11(2): pp. 183-211.

  • Weetaluktuk, D. (1980). A Comment on the Conflicts Between Anthropologists and Inuit.

  • Manuscript, 11 pp. Paper presented at the Second Inuit Studies Conference, October 2, 1980, Université Laval, Québec. Research Department, Makivik Corporation, Inukjuak, Québec.

  • Weetaluktuk, D. (1981). Potential Role of Inuit in Northern Research. Manuscript,” 7 pp. Makivik Research Department, Inukjuak, Québec.

  • Wenzel, G. (2004). From TEK to IQ: Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit and Inuit Cultural Ecology. Arctic Anthropology, 41(2), pp.238-250.


Journal + Issues