The roots of clientelism in Iraqi Kurdistan and the efforts to fight it


This study examines the roots of clientelism in Iraqi Kurdistan and the effort to fight it. The clientelism system exists when a kind of deal is struck between those in power and clients in society who agree to exchange benefits. The political issues in Kurdistan particularly, corruption and lack of social justice have historical roots as a result of the accumulation of problems that have not been resolved by the client system that is adopted by the two political parties in power, namely the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) and the Democratic Party of Kurdistan (KDP). The two political parties have monopolised the public sector, the Peshmerga and Security forces, as well as the economy, they have succeeded in controlling the larger part of society through clientelism. In hence, they used public funds, jobs and posts to buy people’s votes and loyalty. The opposition parties have been unable to exert pressure on the ruling parties who can buy the affiliation of people through the use of public finance. The opposition and independent media began to play a large role in highlighting the corruption and the client system.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • AL- Zaidi, R and Sadiq, Y (eds.) (2012). Almwarada alseaseya fy eqlim Kurdistan- Al Iraq: Nasha wa almwtaqbal. Doha, Arabic center for research and political studies. Ali, B (2009). Negayak lajawhary aw hezai esta lahanawe komalgae emadad ajwlet. [online]. Sbeiy, 1 June. Last accessed 3 December 2012 at:

  • Bali, A, O (2016). Political Development in Kurdistan. Inter. J. Polit. Sci. Develop. 4 (6), 208-215

  • Bali, A. O., & Abdullah, K. H. (2017). The consequence of an economic boom on the perception of democracy, government performance and public service: Iraqi Kurdistan as a case study. International Journal of Contemporary Iraqi Studies, 11(3), 221-234.

  • Bali, A. O., Karim, M. S., & Rached, K. (2018). Public Diplomacy Effort Across Facebook: A Comparative Analysis of the US Consulate in Erbil and the Kurdistan Representation in Washington. SAGE Open, 8(1), 2158244018758835.

  • Bardhan, p and Mookherjee, D (2011). Political clientelism and capture: theory and evidence from west bengal. University of Berkeley.

  • Bellamy, R (2013). Croce, Gramsci, Bobbio and the Italian political tradition. Ecpr Press.

  • Chaudhry, K ( 2011) Princes, Brokers, and Bureaucrats: Oil and the State in Saudi Arabia. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 40.1: 46-47.

  • Dabrowska, K and Hann, G (2008). Iraq then and now: A guide to the country and its people. Bradt Travel Guides.

  • Haji, S (2015). Gorran labardam taqekrdnawadaya. Awena. 6 October. Last accessed 14 October 2015 at:

  • Hardy, A (2015) Haqeqataka tala. Awena, 13 September. Last accessed 14 October 2015 at:

  • Hawlati (2012a).Aub Barzani: wahmeke matrsedara ka opozisyon btwanet chaksazi bam dasalata bkat. [online]. 5 December. Last accessed 15 December at:

  • Hussain, K (2015). Almutama almusayas fe Kurdistan youajihw nedama sultanean. Markaz karenge lel sharq alawsat. 18 Augest. Last accessed at 14 October at:

  • Krmanj, S (2015). Nechervan barzani badamazrawaykrd yan bnkolkrdne damazrawakan. Awena, 14 Augest. Last accessed 14 October 2015 at:

  • Muhamad, K (2008). Pewarw amarakan bo bodjay hareme Kurdistan bo saly 2008. Nwebwn. 2,(4), 59-87.

  • Mustafa, N (2008). Hizbw hukwm: azmuni Kurdistan. [online]. Sbeiy, 4 June. Last accessed 16 December 2012 at:

  • Mustafa, N (2009). Lanewan mnw mam jala.Sulaimani, Rang Printing.

  • Nury, N (2012). Focus of Economic inequality in the Iraqi Kurdistan. PhD University of Exeter.

  • Qani, M (2015). Roshnber w baya yan roshnberey baya. Awena, 8 Augest. Last accessed14 september 2015 at:

  • Qani, M and Fattah, A (2012).Dawlati Kurdi lanewan damamkw brenda. [online]. Awena News, 27 March 2012. Last accessed 10 December 2012 at:

  • Rasul, Z (2010). Opozisyoune seyase la hareme Kurdistan. Roshingary Magazine, 87 (4), 88 - 92.

  • Reddick , C, G. (2010). Comparative E-government. Springer Science & Business Media. , 25.

  • Roniger , L (2004). Political clientelism, democracy, and market economy. Comparative politics, Vol. 36 no. 3, April, 353-375.

  • Salih, H (2010). Alsahafa alektronea alKurdia, maqe Sbaeiy nmwdajan. MA Media study,University of Sulaimani.

  • Salih, M (2015). Eadat tashkeel al iqtisadi w altabaqa alwsta 2003 - 2014. Alalam. 12 October,6.

  • Stansfield , G, RV (2003). Iraqi Kurdistan: Political development and emergent democracy. London and New York, Routledge.

  • Stokes,S et al. (2013). Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: the puzzle of distributive politics. Cambridge University Press.

  • Warner, S, M (1997). Political parties and the opportunity costs of patronage. Party Politics, 3 (4), 533-548.

Journal + Issues

Open Political Science is an Open Access, peer-reviewed academic journal that welcomes contributions written in English addressing political science in its various forms and aspects: historical, philosophical and sociological. Contributions are written by researchers who represent different schools and points of view. The aim of the journal is to promote an international and interdisciplinary dialogue.