Objects are inert, passive, devoid of will, and as such bear no intrinsic value or moral worth. This claim is supported by the argument that to be considered a moral agent one must have a conscious will and be sufficiently free to act in accordance with that will. Since material objects, it is assumed, have no active will nor freedom, they should not be considered moral agents nor bearers of intrinsic ethical vale. Thus, the apparent “moral neutrality” of objects rests upon a kind of subject/object or mind/body dualism. The aim of this paper is to explore two paths by which western thought can escape this dualism, re-valuate the alleged “moral neutrality” of material objects, and initiate a sort of “object oriented ethics,” albeit with surprising results. To do so, this paper explores the work of Arthur Schopenhauer and Baruch Spinoza to interrogate both the claim that material objects have no will and that freedom is the necessary condition for ethical responsibility. This paper concludes by arguing that not only should objects been seen as bearers of their own ethical value, a determinate judgement can be made regarding that value through a basic understanding of the laws of physics.
Epictetus, Discourses and Selected Writings, trans. and ed. by Robert Dobbin. London: Penguin Books, 2008.
Go, Kenji. “Montaigne’s “Cannibals” and “The Tempest” Revisited.” Studies in Philology, vol. 109, no. 4, 2012. pp. 455-473.
Greene, Brian. The Fabric of the Universe: Space, Time, and the Texture of Reality. New York: Vintage, 2004.
Harman, Graham. Immaterialism: Object and Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2016.
Harman, Graham. The Quadruple Object. Winchester: Zero Books, 2011.
Harman, Graham. Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything. London: Pelican Books, 2018.
Harman, Graham. Tool-Being: Heidegger and the Metaphysics of Objects. Chicago: Open Court, 2002.
Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time, trans. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York: Harper and Row, 1962.
Kant, Immanuel. The Critique of Pure Reason, trans. and ed. Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Kant, Immanuel. Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. James Ellington, in Kant’s Ethical Philosophy, ed. Warner A. Wick. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co., 1983.
Montaigne, Michel de, Michel de Montaigne: The Complete Essays, trans. and ed. M.A. Screech. London: Penguin Books, 1997.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. “Ecce Homo,” in Basic Writings of Nietzsche. trans. and ed. by Walter Kaufmann. New York: Modern Library, 1967.
Parens, Joshua. Maimonides and Spinoza: Their Conflicting Views on Human Nature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. “Letter from J.J. Rousseau to M. de Voltaire,” in Rousseau: The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings, ed. and trans. by Victor Gourevitch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Seneca, The Stoic Philosophy of Seneca, trans. Moses Hadas. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 1958.
Schopenhauer, Arthur. “On the Will in Nature,” in On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason and Other Writings, trans. and ed. David E. Cartwrights, Edward E. Erdmann, and Christopher Janaway. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Schopenhauer, Arthur. The World as Will and Representation, vol. I, trans. E.F.J. Payne. New York: Dover Publications, 1969.
Shakespeare, William. The Oxford Shakespeare: Hamlet. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Sparrow, Tom. The End of Phenomenology: Metaphysics and the New Realism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2014.
Spinoza, Baruch. “Letter 43,” in Complete Works. Ed. Michael L Morgan. Trans. Samuel Shirley. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 2002.
Spinoza, Benedict. The Ethics in A Spinoza Reader: The Ethics and Other Works, ed. and trans. by Edwin Curley. Princeton: Princeton University, 1994.
Voltaire. “The Lisbon Earthquake,” in The Portable Voltaire, ed. Ben Ray Redman. New York: Penguin Books, 1977.
Open Philosophy is an international Open Access, peer-reviewed academic journal covering all areas of philosophy. The objective of Open Philosophy is to foster free exchange of ideas and provide an appropriate platform for presenting, discussing and disseminating new concepts, current trends, theoretical developments and research findings related to the broadest philosophical spectrum.