Computer Modeling in Philosophy of Religion

F. LeRon Shults 1
  • 1 University of Agder, , Kristiansand, Norway

Abstract

How might philosophy of religion be impacted by developments in computational modeling and social simulation? After briefly describing some of the content and context biases that have shaped traditional philosophy of religion, this article provides examples of computational models that illustrate the explanatory power of conceptually clear and empirically validated causal architectures informed by the bio-cultural sciences. It also outlines some of the material implications of these developments for broader metaphysical and metaethical discussions in philosophy. Computer modeling and simulation can contribute to the reformation of the philosophy of religion in at least three ways: by facilitating conceptual clarity about the role of biases in the emergence and maintenance of phenomena commonly deemed “religious,” by supplying tools that enhance our capacity to link philosophical analysis and synthesis to empirical data in the psychological and social sciences, and by providing material insights for metaphysical hypotheses and metaethical proposals that rely solely on immanent resources.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Barlev, Michael, Spencer Mermelstein, and Tamsin C. German. “Core Intuitions About Persons Coexist and Interfere With Acquired Christian Beliefs About God.” Cognitive Science 41 (2017): 425-454. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12435.

  • Benzmüller, Christoph, and Bruno Woltzenlogel Paleo. “The Inconsistency in Gödel’s Ontological Argument: A Success Story for AI in Metaphysics.” In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 936-942. AAAI Press, 2016.

  • Bourget, David, and David J. Chalmers. “What do philosophers believe?” Philosophical studies 170, no. 3 (2014): 465-500.

  • Breslin, Michael J., and Christopher A. Lewis. “Schizotypy and Religiosity: The Magic of Prayer.” Archive for the Psychology of Religion 37, no. 1 (2015): 84-97. https://doi.org/10.1163/15736121-12341300.

  • Bulbulia, Joseph. “Spreading Order: Religion, Cooperative Niche Construction, and Risky Coordination Problems.” Biology & Philosophy 27, no. 1 (2012): 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-011-9295-x.

  • Conte, Rosaria, Giulia Andrighetto, and Marco Campennì. Minding Norms : Mechanisms and Dynamics of Social Order in Agent Societies. Oxford University Press, 2014.

  • Dávid-Barrett, Tamás, and James Carney. “The deification of historical figures and the emergence of priesthoods as a solution to a network coordination problem.” Religion, Brain & Behavior 6, no. 4 (2016): 307-317.

  • Davies, Martin F., Murray Griffin, and Sue Vice. “Affective Reactions to Auditory Hallucinations in Psychotic, Evangelical and Control Groups.” British Journal of Clinical Psychology 40, no. 4 (2001): 361-370. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466501163850.

  • De Cruz, Helen, and Johan De Smedt. A Natural History of Natural Theology: The Cognitive Science of Theology and Philosophy of Religion. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2014.

  • De Cruz, Helen, and Johan De Smedt. “How do philosophers evaluate natural theological arguments? An experimental philosophical investigation.” In Advances in religion, cognitive science, and experimental philosophy, edited by Helen De Cruz and Ryan Nichols, pp. 119-142. London: Bloomsbury Academic (2016).

  • De Cruz, Helen, and Johan De Smedt. “Paley’s IPod: The Cognitive Basis of the Design Argument within Natural Theology.” ZYGON, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01120.x.

  • De Smedt, J., and H. De Cruz. “The Cognitive Appeal of the Cosmological Argument.” Method & Theory in The Study Of Religion 23, no. 2 (2011): 103-122. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006811X567715.

  • DeLanda, Manuel. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum, 2006.

  • DeLanda, Manuel. Assemblage Theory. Edinburgh University Press, 2016.

  • DeLanda, Manuel. Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2013.

  • DeLanda, Manuel. Philosophy and Simulation: The Emergence of Synthetic Reason. London: Continuum, 2011.

  • Donaldson, Steve, and Melanie McConnell. “Simulation as a Method for Theological and Philosophical Inquiry.” Theology and Science 13, no. 3 (2015): 354-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2015.1053763.

  • Draper, Paul, and Ryan Nichols. “Diagnosing Bias in Philosophy of Religion.” The Monist 96, no. 3 (2013): 420.

  • Dutton, Edward, and Dimitri Van der Linden. “Why Is Intelligence Negatively Associated with Religiousness?” Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2017, 1-12.

  • Ellis, Lee, Anthony W. Hoskin, Edward Dutton, and Helmuth Nyborg. “The Future of Secularism: A Biologically Informed Theory Supplemented with Cross-Cultural Evidence.” Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2017, 1-19.

  • Elsenbroich, Corinna, and Nigel Gilbert. Modelling Norms. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014.

  • Floridi, Luciano. Philosophy and computing: An introduction. London: Routledge, 2002.

  • Ganzach, Yoav, and Chemi Gotlibovski. “Intelligence and Religiosity: Within Families and over Time.” Intelligence 41, no. 5 (2013): 546-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.07.003.

  • Gervais, Will M., and Ara Norenzayan. “Analytic Thinking Promotes Religious Disbelief.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 336, no. 6080 (2012): 493-96. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215647.

  • Gore, Ross, Carlos Lemos, F. LeRon Shults, and Wesley J. Wildman. “Forecasting Changes in Religiosity and Existential Security with an Agent-Based Model.” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 21 (2018): 1-31.

  • Grim, Patrick, Robert Rosenberger, Adam Rosenfeld, Brian Anderson, and Robb E. Eason. “How simulations fail.” Synthese 190, no. 12 (2013): 2367-2390.

  • Grim, Patrick. “Modeling Epistemology: Examples and Analysis in Computational Philosophy of Science.” Proceedings of the Spring Simulation Conference, Society for Modeling & Simulation International, 2019, 1-12.

  • Haynes, Chris, Michael Luck, Peter McBurney, Samhar Mahmoud, Tomáš Vítek, and Simon Miles. “Engineering the Emergence of Norms: A Review.” The Knowledge Engineering Review 32 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888917000169.

  • Henrich, Joseph. “The Evolution of Costly Displays, Cooperation and Religion: Credibility Enhancing Displays and Their Implications for Cultural Evolution.” Evolution and Human Behavior 30, no. 4 (2009): 244-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.03.005.

  • Hungerman, D. M. “The Effect of Education on Religion: Evidence from Compulsory Schooling Laws.” Journal Of Economic Behavior & Organization 104 (2014): 52-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.09.004.

  • Iannaccone, Laurence R., and Michael D. Makowsky. “Accidental atheists? Agent-based explanations for the persistence of religious regionalism.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 46, no. 1 (2007): 1-16.

  • Inglehart, Ronald, and Christian Welzel. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge University Press, 2005.

  • Kirchner, Daniel, Christoph Benzmüller, and Edward N. Zalta. “Computer Science and Metaphysics: A Cross-Fertilization.” ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1905.00787, 2019.

  • Knepper, Timothy. The ends of philosophy of religion: Terminus and telos. New York: Springer, 2013.

  • Lane, Justin. “Strengthening the supernatural punishment hypothesis through computer modeling.” Religion, Brain & Behavior 8, no. 3 (2018): 290-300.

  • Lanman, Jonathan A., and Michael D. Buhrmester. “Religious Actions Speak Louder than Words: Exposure to Credibility-Enhancing Displays Predicts Theism.” Religion, Brain & Behavior, 2015, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2015.1117011.

  • Lemos, Carlos M., Ross J. Gore, Laurence Lessard-Phillips, and F. LeRon Shults. “A Network Agent-Based Model of Ethnocentrism and Intergroup Cooperation.” Quality & Quantity, 2019, 1-27.

  • Lewis, James R. “Education, Irreligion, and Non-Religion: Evidence from Select Anglophone Census Data.” Journal of Contemporary Religion 30, no. 2 (2015): 265-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2015.1025556.

  • Lindeman, Marjaana, and Annika M. Svedholm-Häkkinen. “Does Poor Understanding of Physical World Predict Religious and Paranormal Beliefs?” Applied Cognitive Psychology 30, no. 5 (2016): 736-742. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3248.

  • Lindeman, Marjaana, Annika M. Svedholm-Häkkinen, and Jari Lipsanen. “Ontological Confusions but Not Mentalizing Abilities Predict Religious Belief, Paranormal Belief, and Belief in Supernatural Purpose.” Cognition 134 (2015): 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.09.008.

  • Maitzen, Stephen. “Against Ultimacy.” In Renewing Philosophy of Religion: Exploratory Essays, edited by Paul Draper & J.L. Schellenberg, 48-62. Oxford University Press, 2018.

  • Marks, Joel. Hard Atheism and the Ethics of Desire: An Alternative to Morality. New York: Springer, 2016.

  • Mascaro, Steven. Evolving Ethics: The New Science of Good and Evil. Imprint Academic, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/inu.30000127033425.

  • Matthews, Luke J., Jeffrey Edmonds, Wesley J. Wildman, and Charles L. Nunn. “Cultural inheritance or cultural diffusion of religious violence? A quantitative case study of the Radical Reformation.” Religion, Brain & Behavior 3, no. 1 (2013): 3-15.

  • McLaughlin, Anne, and Alicia McGill. “Explicitly Teaching Critical Thinking Skills in a History Course.” Science & Education 26, no. 1 (2017): 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9878-2.

  • Norenzayan, Ara, Will M. Gervais, and Kali H. Trzesniewski. “Mentalizing Deficits Constrain Belief in a Personal God.” PLoS ONE 7, no. 5 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036880.

  • Norris, Pippa, and Ronald Inglehart. “Are High Levels of Existential Security Conducive to Secularization? A Response to Our Critics,” In The changing world religion map, pp. 3389-3408. Springer: Dordrecht, 2015.

  • Norris, Pippa, and Ronald Inglehart. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. 2 edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

  • Pennycook, Gordon, James Allan Cheyne, Nathaniel Barr, Derek J. Koehler, and Jonathan A. Fugelsang. “Cognitive Style and Religiosity: The Role of Conflict Detection.” Memory and Cognition 42, no. 1 (2014): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0340-7.

  • Roitto, Rikard. “Dangerous but contagious altruism: recruitment of group members and reform of cooperation style through altruism in two modified versions of Hammond and Axelrod’s simulation of ethnocentric cooperation.” Religion, Brain & Behavior 6, no. 2 (2016): 154-168.

  • Schilbrack, Kevin. Philosophy and the Study of Religions: A Manifesto. Wiley-Blackwell Manifestos. John Wiley & Sons, 2014.

  • Shults, F. LeRon. “Can Theism Be Defeated? CSR and the Debunking of Supernatural Agent Abductions.” Religion, Brain & Behavior, 2015, 14-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2015.1107251.

  • Shults, F. LeRon. “How to Survive the Anthropocene: Adaptive Atheism and the Evolution of Homo Deiparensis.” Religions 6, no. 2 (2015): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel6020724.

  • Shults, F. LeRon. Iconoclastic Theology: Gilles Deleuze and the Secretion of Atheism. Edinburgh University Press, 2014.

  • Shults, F. LeRon. “Modeling Metaphysics: The Rise of Simulation and the Reversal of Platonism.” Proceedings of the Spring Simulation Conference, Society for Modeling & Simulation International, 2019, 1-12.

  • Shults, F. LeRon. Practicing Safe Sects: Religious Reproduction in Scientific and Philosophical Perspective. Leiden: Brill Academic, 2018.

  • Shults, F. LeRon. Theology after the Birth of God : Atheist Conceptions in Cognition and Culture. Radical Theologies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.

  • Shults, F. LeRon. “Toxic Theisms?: New Strategies for Prebunking Religious Belief-Behavior Complexes," in press.

  • Shults, F. LeRon, Ross Gore, Carlos Lemos, and Wesley J. Wildman. “Why Do the Godless Prosper? Modeling the Cognitive and Coalitional Mechanisms That Promote Atheism.” Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 10, no. 3 (2018): 218-28.

  • Shults, F. LeRon, Ross Gore, Wesley J. Wildman, Christopher Lynch, Justin E. Lane, and Monica Toft. “A Generative Model of the Mutual Escalation of Anxiety Between Religious Groups.” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 21, no. 4 (2018): DOI: 10.18564/jasss.3840.

  • Shults, F. LeRon, Justin E. Lane, Saikou Diallo, Christopher Lynch, Wesley J. Wildman, and Ross Gore. “Modeling Terror Management Theory: Computer Simulations of the Impact of Mortality Salience on Religiosity.” Religion, Brain & Behavior 8, no. 1 (2018): 77-100.

  • Shults, F. LeRon, Wesley J. Wildman, Justin E. Lane, Christopher J. Lynch, and Saikou Diallo. “Multiple Axialities: A Computational Model of the Axial Age.” Journal of Cognition and Culture 18, no. 5 (2018): 537-564.

  • Shults, F. LeRon, and Wesley J. Wildman. “Simulating religious entanglement and social investment in the neolithic.” In Religion, History and Place in the Origin of Settled Life, edited by Ian Hodder. University of Colorado Press (2018): 33-63.

  • Shults, F. LeRon, and Wesley J. Wildman. “Ethics, Computer Simulation, and the Future of Humanity.” In Human Simulation: Perspectives, Insights, and Applications, edited by Saikou Diallo, Wesley J. Wildman, F. LeRon Shults, & Andreas Tolk. Berlin: Springer, in press.

  • Shults, F. LeRon, Wesley J. Wildman, and Virginia Dignum. “The Ethics of Computer Modeling and Simulation.” In 2018 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), 4069-4083. IEEE, 2018.

  • Slone, D. Jason. Theological Incorrectness : Why Religious People Believe What They Shouldn’t. Oxford University Press, 2007.

  • Squazzoni, Flaminio, ed. Epistemological aspects of computer simulation in the social sciences. Springer, 2009.

  • Stoet, Gijsbert, and David C. Geary. “Students in Countries with Higher Levels of Religiosity Perform Lower in Science and Mathematics.” Intelligence 62 (2017): 71-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.03.001.

  • Teehan, John. “The Cognitive Bases of the Problem of Evil.” The Monist 96, no. 3 (2013): 325.

  • Tobia, Kevin Patrick. “Does Religious Belief Infect Philosophical Analysis?” Religion, Brain & Behavior 6, no. 1 (2016): 56-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2014.1000952.

  • Troitzsch, Klaus G. “Can Lawlike Rules Emerge without the Intervention of Legislators?” Frontiers in Sociology 3 (2018):https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2018.00002.

  • Van Der Tempel, Jan, and James E. Alcock. “Relationships between Conspiracy Mentality, Hyperactive Agency Detection,and Schizotypy: Supernatural Forces at Work?” Personality and Individual Differences 82 (2015): 136-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.010.

  • Weisberg, Michael. Simulation and similarity: Using models to understand the world. Oxford University Press, 2012.

  • Whitehouse, Harvey, Ken Kahn, Michael E. Hochberg, and Joanna J. Bryson. “The role for simulations in theory construction for the social sciences: Case studies concerning divergent modes of religiosity.” Religion, Brain & Behavior 2, no. 3 (2012): 182-201.

  • Wildman, Wesley J. “Reforming Philosophy of Religion for the Modern Academy.” In Reconfigurations of Philosophy of Religion: A Possible Future, edited by Jim Kanaris, 253-69. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2018.

  • Wildman, Wesley J., and David Rohr. “North American Philosophers of Religion: How They See Their Field,” 133-153, in Draper, Paul, and John L. Schellenberg, eds. Renewing philosophy of religion: exploratory essays. Oxford University Press, 2017.

  • Wildman, Wesley J., and Richard Sosis. “Stability of groups with costly beliefs and practices.” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 14, no. 3 (2011): 1-25.

  • Winsberg, Eric. Science in the age of computer simulation. University of Chicago Press, 2010.

  • Wlodarski, Rafael, and Eiluned Pearce. “The God Allusion: Individual Variation in Agency Detection, Mentalizing and Schizotypy and Their Association with Religious Beliefs and Behaviors.” Human Nature 27, no. 2 (2016): 160-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-016-9256-9.

  • Xenitidou, Maria, and Bruce Edmonds, eds. The Complexity of Social Norms. Berlin: Springer, 2014.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Open Philosophy is an international Open Access, peer-reviewed academic journal covering all areas of philosophy. The objective of Open Philosophy is to foster free exchange of ideas and provide an appropriate platform for presenting, discussing and disseminating new concepts, current trends, theoretical developments and research findings related to the broadest philosophical spectrum.

Search