How Dumb Are Big Dumb Objects? OOO, Science Fiction, and Scale

Raino Isto 1
  • 1 Mott Community College, , Flint, United States of America

Abstract

This article considers the potential intersections of object-oriented ontology and science fiction studies by focusing on a particular type of science-fictional artifact, the category of ‘Big Dumb Objects.’ Big Dumb Objects is a terminology used—often quite playfully—to describe things or structures that are simultaneously massive in size and enigmatic in purpose: they stretch the imagination through both the technical aspects of their construction and the obscurity of their purpose. First used to designate the subjects of several science fiction novels written in the 1970s, Big Dumb Objects (often called BDOs) have been understood in terms of science fiction’s enduring interest in the technological sublime and the transcendental. While object-oriented ontology has often turned to science fiction and weird fiction for inspiration in rethinking the possibilities inherent in things and their relations, it has not considered the implications of BDOs for a theory of the object more broadly. The goal of this article is to consider how extreme size and representations of scale in science fiction can help expand an understanding of the object along lines that are similar to those pursued by object-oriented ontology, especially Timothy Morton’s notion of hyperobjects.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Banks, Iain M. Matter. New York: Orbit, 2008.

  • Bear, Greg. Eon. New York: Tor, 1985.

  • Bogost, Ian. Alien Phenomenology, or What It’s Like to Be a Thing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2012.

  • Bryant, Levi. The Democracy of Objects. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press, 2011.

  • Chu, Seo-Young. Do Metaphors Dream of Literal Sleep? A Science-Fictional Theory of Representation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2010.

  • Clarke, Arthur C. Rendezvous with Rama. New York: Bantam, 1990.

  • Clarke, Arthur C. 2001: A Space Odyssey. New York: Roc, 1993.

  • Dyson, Freeman J. “Search for Artificial Stellar Sources of Infrared Radiation.” Science. 131:3414 (June 3, 1960), 1667-1668.

  • Fortin, David Terrance. Architecture and Science-Fiction Film: Phillip K. Dick and the Spectacle of Home. Burlington: Ashgate, 2011.

  • Harman, Graham. “Materialism is Not the Solution: On Matter, Form, and Mimesis.” The Nordic Journal of Aesthetics. 47 (2014), 94-110.

  • Harman, Graham. The Quadruple Object. Washington: Zero Books, 2011.

  • Harman, Graham. Weird Realism: Lovecraft and Philosophy. Washington: Zero Books, 2012.

  • Heinlein, Robert A. “—And He Built a Crooked House—.” In The Unpleasant Profession of Jonathan Hoag, 191-214. New York: Berkeley Medallion: 1959.

  • Isto, Raino. “In the Valley of the Time Tombs: Monumentality, Temporality, and History in SF.” Science Fiction Studies (forthcoming November 2019).

  • Kaveney, Roz. “Science Fiction in the 1970s: Some Dominant Themes and Personalities.” Foundation. (June 1981), 5-35.

  • Latham, Rob, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Science Fiction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.

  • Meillassoux, Quentin. After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. New York: Continuum, 2008.

  • Meillassoux, Quentin. Science Fiction and Extro-Science Fiction, trans. Aloyshe Edlbei.

  • Morton, Timothy. Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology After the End of the World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013.

  • Nicholls, Peter. “Big Dumb Objects.” In The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction, edited by John Clute and Peter Nicholls, 118-119. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin, 1993.

  • Nicholls, Peter. “Big Dumb Objects and Cosmic Enigmas: The Love Affair between Space Fiction and the Transcendental.” In Space and Beyond: The Frontier Theme in Science Fiction, edited by Gary Westfahl, 11-23. Westport: Greenwood, 2000.

  • Niven, Larry. “Bigger than Worlds.” In A Hole in Space, 111-126. New York: Ballantine, 1974.

  • Niven, Larry. Ringworld. New York: Del Rey, 1970.

  • Renault, Gregory. “Science Fiction as Cognitive Estrangement: Darko Suvin and the Marxist Critique of Mass Culture.” Discourse. 2 (Summer, 1980), 113-141.

  • Scharmen, Fred. “What is a Big Dumb Object?” Journal of Architectural Education. 69:2 (2015), 178-186.

  • Shaviro, Steven. Discognition. London: Repeater, 2016.

  • Shaw, Bob. Orbitsville. New York: Baen, 1989.

  • Stapledon, Olaf. The Last and First Men & Star Maker. New York: Dover, 1968.

  • Suvin, Darko. The Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics and History of a Literary Genre. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979.

  • Willems, Brian. Speculative Realism and Science Fiction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2017.

  • Wilson, Robert Charles. The Chronoliths. New York: Tor, 2001.

  • Wolfe, Gary. “The Artifact as Icon in Science Fiction.” Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts. 1:1 (1988), 51-69.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Open Philosophy is an international Open Access, peer-reviewed academic journal covering all areas of philosophy. The objective of Open Philosophy is to foster free exchange of ideas and provide an appropriate platform for presenting, discussing and disseminating new concepts, current trends, theoretical developments and research findings related to the broadest philosophical spectrum.

Search