Abstract
Object-oriented ontologists understand relations of cause and effect to be sensory or aesthetic in nature, not involving direct interaction between objects. Four major arguments are used to defend an indirect view of causation: 1) that there are analogies between perception and causation, 2) that the indirect view can account for cases of causation which a direct view cannot, 3) an Occasionalist argument that direct interaction would make causation impossible, and 4) that the view simply fits better with object-oriented ontology’s own premises. However, each argument is fallacious or otherwise unconvincing. The first affirms the consequent. The second fails because the relevant cases can easily be accounted for with a direct view. The third makes false assumptions about the relation between parts and wholes. And the fourth can also be used to argue against object-oriented ontology. Many of these problems can be traced to the methodological aspects of object-oriented ontology and might be avoided by emphasizing the role of non-argumentative justification in metaphysics.
References
Betsky, Aaron. “The Triple O Play.” Architect. 18 October 2017. Accessed March 4, 2019. https://www.architectmagazine.com/design/the-triple-o-play_o.Search in Google Scholar
Bryant, Levi R. The Democracy of Objects. London: Open Humanities Press, 2011.10.3998/ohp.9750134.0001.001Search in Google Scholar
Cogburn, Jon. “Aesthetics as First Philosophy: Sense-Making after Speculative Realism.” Unpublished draft. Accessed 20 April 2019. https://www.academia.edu/22685785/Aesthetics_as_First_Philosophy_Sense_Making_After_Speculative_Realism.Search in Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Félix. What is Philosophy?, trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Graham Burchell. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.Search in Google Scholar
Eastham, Ben. “OOO! The Return to Objects.” Elephant, vol. 31 (2018). Accessed February 7, 2019. https://elephant.art/returnof-objects/.Search in Google Scholar
Ennis, Paul J. “Interview with Ian Bogost” in Post-Continental Voices: Selected Interviews. Alresford: Zero Books, 2010, 48-63.Search in Google Scholar
Harman, Graham. Circus Philosophicus. London: Zero Books, 2010.Search in Google Scholar
Harman, Graham. Immaterialism: Objects and Social Theory. Malden: Polity, 2016.Search in Google Scholar
Harman, Graham. Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything. London: Pelican, 2018.Search in Google Scholar
Harman, Graham. The Quadruple Object. Alresford: Zero Books, 2011.Search in Google Scholar
Harman, Graham. Towards Speculative Realism: Essays and Lectures. Alresford: Zero Books, 2010.Search in Google Scholar
Morton, Timothy. Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013.Search in Google Scholar
Morton, Timothy. Realist Magic: Objects, Ontology, Causality. London: Open Humanities Press, 2013.Search in Google Scholar
Nagarjuna. The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way, trans. Jay L. Garfield. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Search in Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. Words and Life, ed. James Conant. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994.Search in Google Scholar
Rowe, William L. “The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism.” American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 16, no. 4, (1979), 335-341.Search in Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. “Monism: The Priority of the Whole.” Philosophical Review, vol. 119, no. 1, (2010), 31-76.Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 C.J. Davies et al., published by De Gruyter Open
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.